1 / 13

Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota

Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota. Postemployment Benefits for Public Employees. August 20, 2007. Pension Plan Deficits and Benefit Formula Problems. Postretirement Fund’s $4 billion deficit as of July 2006 Benefit formula does not protect the fund

quade
Télécharger la présentation

Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Office of the Legislative AuditorState of Minnesota Postemployment Benefits for Public Employees August 20, 2007

  2. Pension Plan Deficits and Benefit Formula Problems • Postretirement Fund’s $4 billion deficit as of July 2006 • Benefit formula does not protect the fund • Benefit formula does not align benefit increases with inflation

  3. Funding Ratios Do Not Reflect the Postretirement Fund’s Deficit • Funding ratios make pension plans appear better funded than they really are • Funding ratios improperly value the Postretirement Fund’s assets • Assets should be on the basis of a market-related value • 2007 law now requires Pension Commission’s actuarial standards to be consistent with accounting principles

  4. Reported Status of Statewide Pension Plans as of July 1, 2006

  5. Difference in Funding Ratios That Reflect Postretirement Fund’s Deficit, July 1, 2006

  6. Effects of Prior Legislative Changes • Recent legislative changes • Cap of 5 percent on benefit increases • Contributions increased • These changes will not affect the Postretirement Fund’s deficit

  7. Percentage Points Problems With Formula to Increase Benefits • Helped cause deficits • Unaligned with inflation

  8. Problems With Formula to Increase Benefits • Helped cause deficits • Unaligned with inflation • Inequities between cohorts of retirees • Retirees received 9.2 percent average annual increases from 1996 to 2001 • Retirees after July 1, 2001 received increases of 2.5 percent or less

  9. Recommendations • Appropriate disclosure for deficit (provision was passed by 2007 Legislature) • Fully fund the Postretirement Fund • Change formula for benefit increases (state retirement systems’ joint Post Fund committee)

  10. St. Paul Teachers’ Retirement Fund is at risk for serious funding problems $420 million deficit and 69% funding ratio as of July 2006 Inadequate contributions, stock market declines, and postretirement benefit increases Disallow investment-based benefit increases when funds have large deficits Consider formulas based on inflation; consider increasing contributions 2007 law changes Local Teachers’ Retirement Funds

  11. Summary of Findings • Statewide pension plans appear better funded than they really are • Recent changes will not solve the deficit • The St. Paul Teachers’ Retirement Fund at risk of serious funding problems

  12. Summary of Recommendations • The Legislature should: • Require pension plans to reflect status of Postretirement Fund (2007 law) • Fully fund Postretirement Fund and change postretirement benefit formula (Joint Post Fund Committee) • Change postretirement benefit formula for the local teachers’ retirement funds

  13. Postemployment Benefits for Public Employees is available via the World Wide Web at: www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us/ped/2007/postemployment.htm

More Related