1 / 15

REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban

REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban. Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat. Contents. Brief history of Climate Policy, UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol From RED to REDD to REDD+ REDD+ under the Cancun agreements From Cancun to Durban Conclusions.

Télécharger la présentation

REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat

  2. Contents • Brief history of Climate Policy, UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol • From RED to REDD to REDD+ • REDD+ under the Cancun agreements • From Cancun to Durban • Conclusions

  3. 1992: UNFCCC established 2005:COP11 Kyoto entered into force; REDD introduced 2007: COP13 Bali Roadmap 1997: Kyoto Protocol adopted 1995 1990 2000 2005 2010 2001: Marrakesh Accords signed 1988: IPCC established 2012: KP 1st commitment period ends 2008: KP 1st commitment period begins 1994: UNFCCC enter into force Climate Policy Timeline 2010: COP 16 Cancun Agreements 2007 2012

  4. UNFCCC objective • “Stabilize GHG concentrations at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic (human-induced) interference with the climate system” • “Such a level should be achieved within a time-frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner”

  5. Kyoto Protocol and its mechanisms • Treaty under the Convention. Sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the EU (Annex 1 parties) for reducing GHG emissions • Emission reduction targets to be met through national measures & flexible mechanisms (ET, JI, CDM) • Some concerns: • Not all parties ratified • Targets were not ambitious enough • CDM had limitations (methodologies, scope, forest sector)

  6. Global GHG sources by sector Source, IPCC 2007

  7. Why REDD+ • Global deforestation: 13 million ha/yr for 2000-2010 (FAO 2010) • Emissions from deforestation since 1990s at 5.8 GtCO2/yr (IPCCC, WGI, AR4) • REDD: forest mitigation option with largest and most immediate C stock impact (IPCC WGIII, AR4) • 20% of the problem must become 20% of the solution • Area of convergence between industrialized countries and developing countries: win-win • Entry point to move into low carbon development strategies • REDD+ could provide multiple benefits beyond carbon, addressing poverty and biodiversity conservation

  8. REDD+ evolution under the UNFCCC COP 15/ Copenhagen 2009 COP 16/ Cancun 2010 COP 13/ Bali 2007 SBSTA/Montreal 2005 UNFCCC 2 Decisions: BAP & 2/CP. 13 (policy)/ Opening of AWGs LCA & KP Decision 4/CP.15 (methods) Decision 1/CP.16 (policy) Opening Agenda Item 5 RED REDD REDD+ REDD+

  9. REDD+ in Decision 1/CP.16 Scope (a) Reducing emissions from deforestation; (b) Reducing emissions from forest degradation; (c) Conservation of forest carbon stocks; (d) Sustainable management of forest; (e) Enhancement of forest carbon stocks; Scale National with sub-national as an interim measure Phased approach • Developing strategies /action plans, policies and measures & capacity building • Implementation of strategies, policies and measures • Result-based actions fully measured, reported and verified

  10. REDD+ in Decision 1/CP.16 Elements Elements • A national strategy or action plan • A national forest reference level or subnational reference levels as an interimmeasure • A robust and transparent monitoring system, subnationalas an interimmeasure • A system for providing information on how safeguards are being addressed

  11. REDD+ in Decision 1/CP.16 Safeguards • Consistency with national forest programs, international conventions and agreements • Transparent governance structures • Respect for knowledge and rights of Indigenous Peoples and members of local communities • Full and effective participation of relevant stakeholders • Conservation of natural forests and biological diversity • Address displacement of emissions • Address permanence

  12. REDD+ in Decision 1/CP.16 from Cancun to Durban • By COP 17 LCA is requested to: • Explore financing options for the full implementation of REDD+ results-based actions • By COP 17, SBSTA is requested to: • Develop modalities relating to reference levels and forest monitoring systems • Develop guidance relating to safeguards • Develop modalities for MRV anthropogenic forest-related emissions by sources and removals by sinks, forest carbon stocks and forest area changes resulting from the implementation of REDD + activities

  13. REDD+ in Decision 1/CP.16 cont.- SBSTA work programme By COP 18 SBSTA is requested to: • Identify drivers of deforestation and forest degradation • Estimate emissions and removals resulting from these activities • Assess their potential contribution to the mitigation of climate change

  14. Conclusions • REDD+ progressed quickly in the negotiations • Big items still unclear: future of KP, legal form of the new agreement • Cancun agreements set the basis to implement and expand REDD+ readiness efforts • REDD+ and NAMAS?, financial mechanism? • Ambitious SBSTA and LCA agenda can be affected by delays in the political discussion • High expectations in REDD+ countries that need to be managed and addressed

More Related