1 / 138

The Basis For Improving and Reforming Long-Term Care

The Basis For Improving and Reforming Long-Term Care. Part 4: Identifying Meaningful Improvement Approaches Steven A. Levenson MD, CMD. Objectives of This Segment. Previous segments have identified key conceptual foundations For providing high-quality care

quincy
Télécharger la présentation

The Basis For Improving and Reforming Long-Term Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Basis For Improving and Reforming Long-Term Care Part 4: Identifying Meaningful Improvement Approaches Steven A. Levenson MD, CMD

  2. Objectives of This Segment • Previous segments have identified key conceptual foundations • For providing high-quality care • For overseeing and trying to improve care quality • This final segment • Applies earlier discussions to assess current and prospective efforts to improve and reform nursing home care

  3. Recommended Approaches • A number of specific approaches herein • Based on the foregoing discussions • Correctly define the problems • Identify their diverse causes • Present a cohesive strategy • Many of them differ from the conventional wisdom • Should be taken seriously

  4. Ongoing Criticism of Nursing Home Performance • Continuing allegations • Significant improvement still needed • Many important issues and conditions remain inadequately recognized and managed or, conversely, overtreated • Nursing home industry response • In past decade, significant improvement • Competent care despite challenges • More sophisticated postacute care more than in other settings

  5. What is the Truth? • Is care as good as some claim? • If so, why so many more reform efforts? • If not, why would more of the same be any more beneficial? • Which approaches are likely to produce dramatic improvements? • Just how good are the current improvement and reform efforts?

  6. Important Historical Context • Important to understand history of attempts to reform nursing homes • Just as patient history helps us understand his or her current condition • Attempts to reform long-term care have succeeded to some extent

  7. Important Historical Context • Previously, much of criticism of nursing homes and their care has been warranted • Challenge for nursing home staff, practitioners, and management to identify which of the numerous alleged solutions are viable and worth pursuing

  8. Important Historical Context • Some good intentions have gone astray • Inconsistent and incomplete implementation of pertinent ideas • Inaccurate and inappropriate advice • Questionable agendas of various interest groups • Considerable resistance or sabotage • Abundant and problematic political opportunism

  9. Foundation For Subsequent Reforms • Further tinkering is inadequate because • Resources are limited • Waste is problematic • Results count more than ever • Important to consider reasons for success or failure of previous efforts

  10. Recommendations to Improve & Reform Long-Term: Summary • Reconsider current improvement and reform efforts • Challenge the conventional wisdom • Vigorously subdue “political correctness” • Rethink the research agenda • Focus attention on basic care principles and processes

  11. Recommendations to Improve & Reform Long-Term: Summary • Suppress reductionism and jurisdiction over care • Reconsider notions of competency and expertise • Change approaches to assessing and trying to improve quality • Develop biologically sound reimbursement

  12. Reconsider Current Improvement and Reform Efforts

  13. Sources of Efforts to Improve and Reform Long-Term Care • Governmental • Industry groups, associations, and coalitions • Public and consumer initiatives • Physician initiatives • Insurance initiatives • Non-industry organizations and associations

  14. Types of Efforts Targeting Reform • Laws and regulations • Assessment tools • Workforce initiatives • Quality-improvement strategies • Work groups • Campaigns • Consumer initiatives (e.g., “culture change”)

  15. Categories of Approaches Targeting Reform: Examples • Improve information systems for quality monitoring • Strengthen the regulatory process • Strengthen the care giving workforce • Provide consumers with more information

  16. Categories of Approaches Targeting Reform • Strengthen consumer advocacy • Increase Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement • Develop and implement practice guidelines • Change the culture of nursing facilities

  17. Problems and Solutions • Current reform initiatives • A potpourri of approaches • Still lacks a comprehensive problem statement and cohesive strategies • Inadequate to just aggregate multiple “solutions” and reform agendas, e.g. • [Agenda A] + [Idea B] + [Campaign C] + [Proposal D] + [Notion E]

  18. Reform Misconceptions • Easy to identify that something is amiss • May not = having appropriate solutions • Analogous to care planning for a complex patient • Consequences may have multiple causes • Various causes may have multiple consequences

  19. Reform Misconceptions • Before trying to “fix” the problems • Define issues and identify root causes • More interventions are not necessarily better • Some proposed approaches are pertinent and meaningful • Others may exacerbate situation or just circumvent underlying causes

  20. Reform Efforts: Desirable and Problematic

  21. Reform Efforts: Desirable and Problematic

  22. Reform Efforts: Desirable and Problematic

  23. Strategies: Reconsider Current Improvement & Reform Efforts • Evaluate compatibility of various reform efforts with key philosophical and scientific principles • Including evidence-based care and full care delivery process • Focus more on defining issues correctly and identifying root causes

  24. Challenge the Conventional Wisdom

  25. Challenge the Conventional Wisdom • “Conventional wisdom” • “A belief or set of beliefs that is widely accepted, especially one which may be questionable on close examination” • Susceptibility of reform to the conventional wisdom • Only some of it is accurate and pertinent

  26. Challenge the Conventional Wisdom • CW can impede genuine improvement and reform if it • Fails to identify issues correctly • Diverts attention and resources • Leads to inadequate or inappropriate interventions • Both political and clinical CW • Diverse sources of CW

  27. Political CW • Political CW • Refers to platitudes about nursing homes, their staff, and quality of care, as well as to alleged solutions • Clinical CW • Refers to habitual and widespread approaches to aspects of care • Often inconsistent with evidence or fail closer scrutiny • May be so widespread that it becomes a false “standard of care”

  28. Political CW Example: RAI and High-Quality Care • Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) • Including Minimum Data Set (MDS) • Meant to improve on previously haphazard and inadequate assessment • Can be helpful if used as originally intended • A minimum data set with basic functional, behavioral, and psychosocial information

  29. Conventional Wisdom: The Other Side

  30. Conventional Wisdom: The Other Side

  31. CW Example: RAI Misinterpretation and Misuse • Regrettably, RAI has a life of its own • Often serves as primary or sole informational basis for care • MDS has spawned new job description (MDS coordinator) and many consultants • Many efforts to validate assessments and conclusions that are based on it

  32. RAI Use and Misuse • RAI serves a purpose • However, a limited guide to effective clinical decision making • MDS does not consider detailed, chronological patient history • RAI provides only a limited basis for more complex care planning

  33. RAI CW: Basis for Meaningful Reform • More realistic and balanced view needed of the RAI and MDS • Intended for specific purposes • Excessive reliance on assessment instruments has become problematic • Limits to how much it can improve care or give basis for sound reimbursement • Responses to concerns have not necessarily been substantive

  34. Political CW: The Virtues of Interdisciplinary Teams • Interdisciplinary team • Use individuals of multiple disciplines to provide care • Key tenet of geriatrics and long-term care • Also referred to as interdisciplinary care, interdisciplinary care teams, and interdisciplinary collaboration • Approach has proven beneficial

  35. Interdisciplinary Team: Implications and Limitations • Teams are a means to an end • Not an end in themselves • Benefit of teams depends heavily on training, knowledge, qualifications, and performance of team members • Improper realization of IDT team approach may • Distort purpose • Impede care quality improvement

  36. Team Approach: Misconceptions • Team approach can be redundant, inefficient, or hazardous • If team members exceed scope of knowledge and skills • Having more participants does not necessarily improve the care • For example, separate “teams” for issues such as weight loss, skin care, falling, and pain • A single comprehensive collaborative review may be more biologically sound

  37. Amount of Care as a Reflection of Quality • More interventions do not necessarily produce better results • A single intervention targeted at a root cause may be preferable • For example, hypothyroidism or medication-related adverse consequences • Evidence: more care may result in more unnecessary treatment or complications • Amount of care not a reliable measure of quality

  38. Team Approach: Basis For Meaningful Reform • Need to reexamine how nursing homes actually implement true IDT approach • Such scrutiny is likely to show significant variability and deficits • Ineffective or inappropriate team approach can contribute to redundant, irrelevant, or problematic care

  39. Clinical CW: Alleged Virtues of Antibiotics • Many long-term care residents/patients have infections • Colonization is also very common • Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for diverse symptoms and test results • For several decades, concerns about use of antibiotics in various situations

  40. Clinical CW: Alleged Virtues of Antibiotics • Specific criteria for antibiotics use exist • Generally inadvisable to treat colonization • Misdiagnosis and inappropriate antibiotic treatment are common • Routine use of antibiotics for behavior symptoms is largely unwarranted

  41. Clinical CW: Alleged Evils of Antipsychotic Medications • Concerns about antipsychotic medications a major driving force behind nursing home reform efforts • Concern about inappropriate use of all medications is warranted • However, issues are far broader than any one category of medications • Including correct assessment and management of behavioral and psychiatric issues

  42. Clinical CW: The Alleged Evils of Antipsychotic Medications • Nursing home staff and practitioners often bypass the care process • Including meaningful details about behavior • Frequent push for psychiatric consultations for changed or problematic behavior • Inadequate search for underlying causes may lead to • Poor outcomes • Unnecessary or problematic treatment

  43. Clinical CW: The Alleged Evils of Antipsychotic Medications • Drug treatment of behavior and mood disturbances often based on guesswork • New generation of medication-related issues compared with traditional ones • Genuine reform requires attention to issues underlying medication use • Including related clinical problem-solving and decision-making activities

  44. Clinical CW: Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment • Pressure ulcers arouse strong emotions and fervent efforts at reform • Prevention and management of pressure-related wounds has improved overall in nursing homes • It remains problematic in other settings, and still in some nursing homes • Topic still influenced by mythology and misinformation

  45. Clinical CW: Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment • CW heavily promotes nutrition to prevent and heal pressure ulcers • CW promotes the idea that pressure ulcers cause increased energy expenditure • However, evidence often does not support the CW • Despite evidence, pressure ulcer care still haunted by myths and dogma

  46. Clinical CW: Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment • Poor personal, medical, and skin care still common in diverse settings, including hospitals • Continuing need for initiatives says much about widespread and longstanding inconsistent care • Genuine reform requires addressing basic care failures in all settings • Including failure to care for all relevant concerns and risks

  47. Clinical CW: The Alleged Role of Rehabilitation • Rehabilitation is a central tenet of geriatrics and long-term care • Medical stability and illness have a major impact on function • Patients allegedly sent “for rehabilitation” commonly have multiple active medical comorbidities and risk factors • Rehabilitation therapies mostly address impairments, not underlying causes

  48. Rehabilitation Concepts and Misconceptions • In long-term care, rehabilitation commonly equated with provision of therapy services • Physical, occupational, and speech • Rehabilitation has become erroneously equated with function and functional improvement • More discipline-centered than patient-centered

  49. Rehabilitation Concepts and Misconceptions • Inappropriate labeling of being “sent for rehab” • Excessive jurisdiction and domination of utilization review • Diversion from seeking underlying medical causes of impaired function • Knowledge about therapy modalities not same as knowing how to identify underlying causes of impaired function

  50. Challenging the Conventional Wisdom • Genuine reform and improvement requires rethinking and undoing much of the conventional wisdom • Many common practices in long-term care are unfounded • Many beliefs about long-term care are incorrect or misleading • Current CW often prevails because it serves diverse agendas

More Related