110 likes | 119 Vues
This presentation discusses the reproductive aspect of ART initiation in HIV-positive individuals, focusing on the guidelines and their implications. It explores factors influencing reproductive decisions and the potential consequences of these decisions.
E N D
National Antiretroviral Guidelines and Reproduction Among Women Using ART BY Madina Apolot madina.apolot@gmail.com 0752662739
Genesis of the Presentation • The presentation is based on the experience from working with HIV positive people initiating ART in HBAC Tororo
Guidelines on starting ART: reproductive aspect The guidelines are quite elaborate • Before start of ART counseling should be provided on: • Critical need to maintain safe sexual practices to prevent HIV transmission and re-infection • Safer options for reproduction and infant feeding • Current or planned pregnancy and the access to contraceptive services • Pregnancy risks: contraception options and choices • Sexual risks: willingness to practice safer sex, disclosure of HIV sero status, use of condoms • After start of ART follow-up should be done on: • Pregnancy risks: at every visit inquiry should be made on missed periods
Guidelines assumption • When you explain to people especially women about dangers or implications of pregnancy, women automatically will take decisions to control or prevent pregnancy
HBAC approach • All clients are educated on various HIV/AIDS aspects before start of ART: • HIV/AIDS basic information. • Reduction of risk of HIV transmission. • Implication of pregnancy in women living with HIV/AIDS. • Pregnancy and Antiretroviral therapy. • Ideally clients are started on ART, only when they have a clear understanding of the aspects above
Out come of the HBAC process • Clients still desired to become pregnant • Clients became pregnant. • Cases of repeated abortions and miscarriages were reported. • All these happened in spite of HBAC’s efforts to provide the clients with information about risks of pregnancy as per the guidelines
A part from information, what factors influenced reproductive decisions? • Cultural beliefs that people hold about child bearing and the role of women and me in society. • A child for self identity eg a true adult is the one with children, a true woman is the one with children. • Children for security: • children are highly regarded as potential resources and assets in the family. • Children as an insurance against old age. • Security for women; for maintenance of marriage relationships, inheritance of property from husband and support from husbands
Factors influencing reproductive decisions cont. • Children for preservation and continuity of self, family, clan and society • Pressure to reproduce themselves so as to have themselves continuing to live even after death and hence have the society continue to exist. • Producing a son provides the opportunity of continuity of self and society. • To have children is to exist: it is the very basis of survival • The desire to have children normally supersedes any danger to the body associated with having children especially for Childless people.
What are some of the implications of these reproductive decisions? • The objectives of the guidelines (prevention of HIV transmission and prolonging life) will be less effective: • Primary HIV infection in case of discordant couples. • Risk of transmission of HIV to the baby • Deteriorating of health of mothers eg: pregnancy (morning) illness
Observations • Guidelines seem to be guided by the current dominant politics of gender in ARV provision and not research. • Guidelines do not reflect some important aspects that guide the decisions of people to reproduce.
Conclusions • In light of what I consider shortcomings in the guidelines isn't it time/necessary to revise them? • How does one mainstream the above aspects (which influence reproduction decisions in a specific cultural setting) to inform the national guidelines, when we are faced with varying cultures in Uganda? • Given the risks people are willing to take to reproduce themselves in some of these settings (despite our policy makers and academicians/researchers concerns) are we not faced with a huge knowledge deficit that justifies a major research undertaking in order to be more effective?