1 / 6

Econ D10-1: Lecture 3

Econ D10-1: Lecture 3. Individual Demand and Revealed Preference: Choice in an Economic Environment (MWG 2). The Market Choice Structure: Consumption and Budget Sets. Consumers choose a commodity vector x = (x 1 , …, x L ) from the consumption set X  + L

rachel-logan
Télécharger la présentation

Econ D10-1: Lecture 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Econ D10-1: Lecture 3 Individual Demand and Revealed Preference: Choice in an Economic Environment (MWG 2)

  2. The Market Choice Structure: Consumption and Budget Sets • Consumers choose a commodity vector x = (x1, …, xL) from the consumption set X+L • Feasible choices for the consumer are determined by his budget set, which, in turn, is determined by his wealth w>0 and the vector of commodity prices p>>0 that he faces. • The consumer’s competitive or Walrasian budget set is given by Bpw = {x ≥ 0: p.x ≤ w} • Walrasian budget family:B={Bpw: p>>0, w>0}

  3. The Walrasian Demand Correspondence • x(p,w) is a choice rule defined on the Walrasian budget family B. • MWG make the following assumptions. • x is a continuous, single valued function x: ++L+1  +L • x is homogeneous of degree zero:  • (Walras Law) The consumer exhausts his budget: p.x(p,w)=w. 

  4. WARP for Walrasian Demand Functions • Consistency of demand: If bundle x is chosen when (a different) bundlex is affordable, then, if x is ever chosen, bundle x must be unaffordable. • (Samuelsonian) WARP: Given (p,w) and (p,w), if p.x(p,w)≤w and x(p,w)≠x(p,w), then p.x(p,w)>w. • Exercise: Assume that the demand correspondence satisfies Samuelsonian WARP and Walras Law. Prove that it is single valued and homogeneous of degree zero.

  5. Compensated Law of Demand • If x(p,w) satisfies WARP for all (p,w), then compensated demand curves are downward sloping. Proof: Choose (p,w) so that p.x=w=p.x; i.e., x is exactly affordable when x is chosen. Then, p.(x-x) = 0. For x≠x, WARP requires that x be unaffordable when x is chosen, so that p.x>p.x=w or p.(x-x)>0. Subtracting the former from the later yields (p-p).(x-x) = p.x < 0.For pk=0 for all k≠j, this becomes pjxj < 0 or (xj /pj)<0 • (Q: What is the significance of MWG’s Prop. 2.F.1?)

  6. If Walrasian demand function is continuously differentiable: For compensated changes: Substituting yields: The Slutsky matrix of terms involving the cross partial derivatives is negative definite, but not necessarily symmetric. Differential Compensated Law of Demand and the Slutsky Matrix

More Related