1 / 13

Enhancing Impact Monitoring in Malawi: Recommendations for Integrated Assessments

This session focuses on reviewing impact and outcome indicators in Malawi, exploring areas for improvement, and suggesting strategies for integrating qualitative assessments. Recommendations and concerns raised will be discussed to enhance data accuracy and relevance.

radwan
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Impact Monitoring in Malawi: Recommendations for Integrated Assessments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Parallel Session A2Impact and Outcome Monitoring Thursday 25 July 2002 11.00 - 12.00

  2. Purpose of Session Guiding questions for outcome and impact indicators in Malawi: • What do we have? • What do we need? • What can we do better?

  3. Focusing on 3 different areas: • Poverty priority indicators • Programme for surveys and censuses • Integration of qualitative assessments

  4. Poverty priority indicators • Are we monitoring the right impact and outcome indicators in Malawi? • Are some of the MPRS indicators irrelevant? • Are there some important omissions in the MPRS list of indicators?

  5. Survey / census programme • What is the future programme for surveys, censuses, DHSs, etc.? • If there is a such a programme, how does it correspond with the identified needs for data on outcomes and impacts? • If not, how should it look like?

  6. Integrating qualitative assessments Possibilities for integration: • Improvement of the survey questionnaires in the light of participatory findings. • Timing of future PPAs / QUIMs • Scope for doing QUIMs in the same sites as surveys? • Other suggestions…..?

  7. MPRS Outcome/impact indicators

  8. Suggestions...

  9. Recommendations • Limit data sources to Malawi data collection agencies. • Carefully examine indicators in terms of relevance for MPRS inclusion.

  10. Concerns Raised • Reliability of HIV data and this affects target attainment.

  11. 5 years Plan for Surveys 2002 HIV/AIDS Study 2002 CWIQ 2002 Education Survey 2003 QUIM (Qualitative) 2003 Integrated household survey (Security) 2003 CWIQ 2003/04 Labor force survey 2004 MDHS (Demographic 2004 CWIQ 2006 Integrated Household Survey 2008 Census

  12. What do we need?What can we do better? • Recommendations: • Identify a program of work to integrate MIS data with survey data • Funding is a constraint, for instance for future CWIQ which is to be funded by Government. • Need to convince policy makers about the importance of timely data collection • Capacity building for data analysis (NEC, NSO,CSR) – identify where! • District statistics

  13. Integrating Qualitative • Integrated household survey should be followed up by QUIM – same year 2006! • Look at same research areas in HIS and QUIM, e.g. education, health, etc. • Use same sample units in CWIQ and in QUIM to triangulate, explore results and deepen our understanding of poverty • Maintain constant module in surveys to enable time trend analysis of same indicators

More Related