1 / 13

Evaluating Sources

Evaluating Sources. Alisa Cooper Professor of English ENG 102 SMCC. Introduction. This lecture discusses evaluating sources

rafi
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating Sources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluating Sources Alisa Cooper Professor of English ENG 102 SMCC ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  2. Introduction • This lecture discusses evaluating sources • Please read chapter 11 in Writing, Reading, & Research, 5th Ed. Veit, Could, & Clifford and view The Good, The Bad & The Ugly website: http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/eval.html ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  3. Topics of Discussion • Evaluating general sources • Evaluating web sources ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  4. Evaluating Web Sources • Why it’s a good idea to evaluate web sources • Taken from the website: • http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/eval.html ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  5. Criteria • Accuracy • Authority • Objectivity • Currency • Coverage ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  6. Accuracy • Is the information reliable and error-free? • Is there an editor or someone who verifies/checks the information? • Rationale • Anyone can publish anything on the Web • Unlike traditional print resources, web resources rarely have editors or fact-checkers • Currently, no web standards exist to ensure accuracy ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  7. Authority • Is there an author? Is the page signed? • Is the author qualified? An expert?Who is the sponsor? • Is the sponsor of the page reputable? How reputable? • Is there a link to information about the author or the sponsor? • If the page includes neither a signature nor indicates a sponsor, is there any other way to determine its origin? ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  8. Authority • Look for a header or footer showing affilitation. • Look at the URL. http://www.fbi.gov • Look at the domain. .edu, .com, .ac.uk, .org, .net • Rationale • See number 1 above • It's often hard to determine a web page's authorship • Even if a page is signed, qualifications aren't usually given • Sponsorship isn't usually indicated ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  9. Objectivity • Does the information show a minimum of bias? • Is the page designed to sway opinion? • Is there any advertising on the page? • Rationale • Frequently the goals of the sponsors/authors aren't clearly stated. • Often the Web serves as a virtual "Hyde Park Corner", a soapbox. ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  10. Currency • Is the page dated? • If so, when was the last update? • How current are the links? • Have some expired or moved?Rationale • Publication or revision dates not always provided. • If a date is provided, it may have various meanings. For example, • It may indicate when the material was first written • It may indicate when the material was first placed on the Web • It may indicate when the material was last revised ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  11. Coverage • What topics are covered? • What does this page offer that is not found elsewhere? • What is its intrinsic value? • How in-depth is the material? • Rationale • Web coverage often differs from print coverage • Frequently, it's difficult to determine the extent of coverage • Sometimes web information is just-for-fun or outright silliness ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  12. Evaluating Other Sources • All sources are not equally reliable. • Not all writers are equally competent. • Not all periodicals and publishers are equally respected. • And not all statements from interviewees are equally well informed. • And certainly not every claim that appears in print is true. ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

  13. Questions to ask about your source: • Is the publication respectable? • What are the author’s credentials? • Is the source presenting firsthand information? • Does the source demonstrate evidence of careful research? • Is the source up-to-date? • Does the source seem biased? • Do your sources consider all view points and theories? ENG 102 PP5 Cooper

More Related