1 / 45

Measurements of p(e, e’ π + )n in the ∆ (1232) and higher resonances for Q 2 ≤4.9 GeV 2

Measurements of p(e, e’ π + )n in the ∆ (1232) and higher resonances for Q 2 ≤4.9 GeV 2. October 12, 2005 @ Tallahassee, FL. Physics Motivation Kinematics Experiments & Analysis Process Results Cross Section & Asymmetry Structure functions & Photocoupling Amplitude Summary.

rafi
Télécharger la présentation

Measurements of p(e, e’ π + )n in the ∆ (1232) and higher resonances for Q 2 ≤4.9 GeV 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measurements of p(e, e’π+)nin the ∆(1232) and higher resonances for Q2≤4.9GeV2 October 12, 2005 @ Tallahassee, FL • Physics Motivation • Kinematics • Experiments & Analysis Process • Results • Cross Section & Asymmetry • Structure functions & Photocoupling Amplitude • Summary N* 2005 Meeting Kijun Park

  2. Physics Motivation ? History of Roper Resonance Roper signature has been clearly seen in πN and γN reactions. The unresolved low mass of P11(1440) • Close, Capstick, Simula : CQM → N=2 radially excited state • Cano-Gonzalez : A system consisting of a hard quark core & vector meson cloud • Li-Burkert : A hybrid states with q3G • P11(1440) is a pentaquark state ? ? Various Q2 dependences for transition form-factors are predicted by different models. Photocoupling Amplitude N*2005-K.Park

  3. Kinematics Single pion Electroproduction Kinematic variable • Study of Resonance to understand Nucleon Structure • Most Studies for NΔ(1232)and NN*(1535) using pπ0, pρ channels • States with I=1/2 couple more to the nπ+ than pπ0 • Cross Section & Asymmetry gives us information on resonances in excited states Unpol. Xsection w/ one-photon exchange approx. s-channel t-channel Asymmetry N*2005-K.Park

  4. Particle ID (e-,π+) Electron ID : q<0, fiducial , EC, Nphe , vertex cut Pion ID : q>0, fiducial, TOF mass, vertex cut • Kinematic Correction (e-,π+) Applied to both Experimental, MC data • Acceptance Correction [AC] AC calculated by GSIM • Radiative Correction [RC] RC done by ExcluRad (PRD 66, A. Afanasev) • Bin Centering Correction [BCC] BCC performed by Models(MAID03, Sato-Lee) Experimental Data • E1-6 Data Kinematic Coverage • E1-6 Data (Oct.2001-Jan.2002) • 5.754GeV polarized e- & LH2 • ~7M nπ+ trigger after MMx cut • Kinematic Bins = 58,800 N*2005-K.Park

  5. Cross section vs. PHICM , W • Cross section as function of φ* @ W=1.23GeV, CSCM= 0.1, Different Q2 bins • Cross section as function of W @ CSCM= 0.1 , 0.3 φ* =67.5 o, 142.5o Different Q2 bins N*2005-K.Park

  6. MAID00 MAID03 DMT SL Asymmetry vs. PHICM W=1.23GeV, Q2=2.05GeV2 W=1.40GeV, Q2=2.05GeV2 N*2005-K.Park

  7. MAID00 MAID03 SL04 SL Structure Function : N*2005-K.Park

  8. MAID00 MAID03 SL04 SL Structure Function : N*2005-K.Park

  9. MAID00 MAID03 SL04 SL Structure Function : N*2005-K.Park

  10. MAID00 MAID03 DMT MAID98 / Structure Function : N*2005-K.Park

  11. S A 1/2 1/2 Photo-coupling Amp. ; Light-front calculation Quark Models preliminary q3G hybrid state π-2πanalysis πelectro- production IM, DR ηelectro-, photo- production IM, DR RPP estimation GWU (VPI) pion photoproduction This Work Relativistic Quark Model Non-relativistic Quark Model Bonn, DESY, NINA, Jlab(η) re-analyze the old data MAINZ N*2005-K.Park

  12. A A S 1/2 3/2 1/2 Photo-coupling Amp. ; preliminary N*2005-K.Park

  13. Summary • Differential Cross Section has been measured first time completely over all angular range in 1.1 < W < 1.8GeV at high 1.7 < Q2 < 4.9GeV2 • Electron Beam Asymmetry has been measured in same kinematic region. • Measurement of Cross Section and Asymmetry have been compared to recent physics models such as MAID’s, Sato-Lee, DMT etc. • σT+εLσL , σTT , σLT , σLT / Structure Functions have been extracted. • The Cross Section and Beam Spin Asymmetry are fitted to extract the Transition Form Factors and compared with present predictions. N*2005-K.Park

  14. BACKUP SLIDES N*2005-K.Park

  15. Why we are interested in Hadron Physics ?? • The hadrons constitute most of the visible matter. • The contribution of the current quark masses into total baryon mass is very small; most of the hadron mass comes from strong interactions. • Investigation of the spectrum and the internal structure of the hadrons provides information about the underlying strong interactions. • One of the physics goals of the JLab is to investigate the strong interactions in the confinement regime. N*2005-K.Park

  16. Electron Scattering • Elastic Scattering • Target stays intact and holds. • A good tool to study the ground state of the nucleon • Deep Inelastic Scattering • Energy transfer is large, target is broken apart. • A good tool to study the quark-gluon content of the nucleon at small distances. • Resonance excitation • The target is excited into a single bound system. • Allows us to study the internal structure of the ground and the excited states, and very useful for the exclusive reactions. • Key : Nπ decay channels of the intermediate excited states. • This analysis covers not only Δ(1232) but high resonance states. N*2005-K.Park

  17. Quark Model • Quarks are fundamental particle of hadrons. • Quarks interact with each other through eight gluon fields in QCD : SU(3) gauge theory • QCD has a complicate picture for solution at long distances. • Nucleon consists 3 constituent quarks (~300MeV) in a confined potential in constituent quark model. • Presence of Color tensor forces ; spin-spin interaction (Break the spherical symmetry of the ground state) • Simplified other degrees of freedom (pions) may be needed. N*2005-K.Park

  18. The electroproduction of an excited state can be described in terms of 3 photocoupling amplitudes A1/2, A3/2 and S1/2. Describable pion electroproduction using multipole amplitude El,Ml and Sl. l : the orbital angular momentum in Nπ system. The ± sign indicates how the spin of proton couples to the orbital momentum. For each resonance there is one-to-one connection between multipole and helicity amplitudes. g* p N* A1/2, A3/2,S1/2 El, Ml ,Sl p N Electroproduction Amplitudes N*2005-K.Park

  19. gM1 P(938) J=1/2 D(1232) J=3/2 ∆(1232)Resonance • One of the first observed baryon resonances. • Spin J=3/2 and isospin I=3/2. • From angular momentum and parity conservation γN  Δ transition can be induced by E2, M1 and C2 multipoles. • SU(6)xO(3) symmetric quark model describes γN  Δ transition as a single quark spin flip. • If SU(6)xO(3) spatial wave functions are pure L=0, then γN  Δ transition can only be induced by j=1 photons, i.e. only M1+ allowed. • D-waves in the wave function will allow for E1+ andS1+ contributions. e / e • More sophisticated models allow for explicit pion degrees of freedom (pion cloud). • pion cloud can also introduce E1+ andS1+ contributions. e / e N*2005-K.Park

  20. π+ p ph φπ e- Θπ=20o φπ θπ Kinematic Cuts • Particle ID (e-,π+) • Fiducial Volume cut (e-,π+) N*2005-K.Park

  21. Mass of Proton from elastic • Mass of Neutron from nπ+ Kinematic Corrections • Vertex Corr. & Cut After Kine. Corr. For GSIM N*2005-K.Park

  22. tvertex tvertex σ = 0.0372 σ = 0.0368 DATA GSIM AC & RC Corrections • W dependent RC • Angle dependent RC • Acceptance vs. PHICM N*2005-K.Park

  23. Elastic Cross Section • Ratio between elastic cross section and Bosted FFP(Rad) vs. electron angle • Inelastic Cross Section • W dependence of inelastic cross section @ Q2=2.5GeV2 Normalization • Bin correction by sub-binning from two models @ W=1.23GeV, CSCM=0.1, two Q2 bins • Q2 dependence of inelastic cross section @ W=1.21GeV N*2005-K.Park

  24. Electron Beam Asymmetry Asymmetry in W=1.39GeV @ Q2=1.72, 2.05GeV2 & Compare to calculation from five different Physics Models N*2005-K.Park

  25. Electron Beam Asymmetry Asymmetry in W=1.39GeV @ Q2=2.44, 2.91GeV2 & Compare to calculation from five different Physics Models N*2005-K.Park

  26. pi fidu .sys. Tot. sys. e fidu. sys. MMx. sys. pi PID. sys. e PID. sys. Z-vtx. sys. Systematic Uncertainties N*2005-K.Park

  27. 5-th Structure Function σLTP @ W =1.39GeV in five different Q2 bins & Compare to calculation from Physics Models N*2005-K.Park

  28. N*2005-K.Park

  29. Legendre moment as function of W[GeV] D0/(W),D1/ (W) : fit from Pl=2,3,4(cosθ) N*2005-K.Park

  30. Model comparison MAID2000 & 2003 N*2005-K.Park

  31. Dependence of S1/2 , A1/2MAID2003 N*2005-K.Park

  32. Dependence of S1/2 , A1/2MAID2003 Q2=2.GeV2 N*2005-K.Park

  33. Dependence of S1/2 , A1/2MAID2003 Q2=2.GeV2 N*2005-K.Park

  34. Dependence of S1/2 , A1/2MAID2003 Q2=2.GeV2 N*2005-K.Park

  35. σLTP vs. W @ Q2=1.72GeV2, CSCM<0. N*2005-K.Park

  36. σLTP vs. W @ Q2=1.72GeV2, CSCM>0. N*2005-K.Park

  37. σLTP vs. W @ Q2=2.05GeV2, CSCM<0. N*2005-K.Park

  38. σLTP vs. W @ Q2=2.05GeV2, CSCM>0. N*2005-K.Park

  39. σLTP vs. W @ Q2=2.44GeV2, CSCM<0. N*2005-K.Park

  40. σLTP vs. W @ Q2=2.44GeV2, CSCM>0. N*2005-K.Park

  41. σLTP vs. W @ Q2=2.91GeV2, CSCM<0. N*2005-K.Park

  42. σLTP vs. W @ Q2=2.91GeV2, CSCM>0. N*2005-K.Park

  43. Legendre moment as function of W[GeV] D0/(W),D1/ (W) :MAID2003 N*2005-K.Park

  44. Legendre moment vs. Q2 at P11(1440) Various Models MAID2003 D0/(Q2) D1/ (Q2) D0/(Q2) D1/ (Q2) N*2005-K.Park

  45. Legendre moment as function of W, Q2 σLTP = D0/+D1/P1(cosθ)+D2/P2(cosθ) D0/(W), D1/ (W), D0/(Q2), D1/(Q2) A1/2 sensitive to imaginary part of M1- ,S1- W dependence Q2 dependence N*2005-K.Park

More Related