1 / 7

Path Computation Element WG Status

Jean-Philippe Vasseur (jvasseur@cisco.com) Julien Meuric (julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com). Path Computation Element WG Status. Note Well.

randi
Télécharger la présentation

Path Computation Element WG Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Jean-Philippe Vasseur (jvasseur@cisco.com) Julien Meuric (julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com) Path Computation ElementWG Status

  2. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: * The IETF plenary session * The IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG * Any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices * Any IETF working group or portion thereof * The IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB * The RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879). Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. Please consult RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 for details. A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG Statements. A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public.

  3. Administrivia • Blue sheets • Have secretary turned on • Backup note taker? Jabber scribe? • Presenters: stick to your timeslot • People at the mic: please state your name

  4. Agenda Bashing 1. Introduction 1.1. Administrivia, Agenda Bashing (chairs, 5 min) 1.2. WG Status (chairs, 10 min) 2. GMPLS 2.1. PCEP Extensions for GMPLS (Oscar Gonzales de Dios, 5 min) 2.2. PCEP Requirement for RWA (Young Lee, 5 min) 2.3. PCEP Extensions for Signal Compatibility Constraints in WSON (Young Lee, 10 min) 2.4. Protocol Extension Requirement for Cooperation between PCE and Distributed Routing Controller in GMPLS Networks (Yongli Zhao, 5 min) 3. Multi-Domain 3.1. Extensions to PCEP for Hierarchical PCEs (Fatai Zhang, 10 min) 3.2. PCE-Based Computation Procedure To Compute Shortest Constrained P2MP Inter-Domain TE LSPs (Zafar Ali, 10 min) 3.3. Path Key MIB (Dhruv Dhody, 5 min) 3.4. Relayed CSPF for Multi-Area Multi-AS PCE (Wenhu Lu, 10 min) 4. States in PCEs 4.1. Temporary Reservation of Computed Path Resources (Oscar Gonzales de Dios, 10 min) 4.2. Stateful PCE (Kexin Tang, 10 min) 5. Miscellaneous 5.1. P2MP PCEP MIB (Dhruv Dhody, 5 min) 5.2. Backup Node Computation (Huaimo Chen, 10 min)

  5. Milestones Jun 2008 - Submit first draft of applicability statement (for inter-area MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering) -> On the agenda Done - Submit PCE P2MP PCEP protocol extensions to the IESG to be considered as an Proposed Standard RFC -> RFC 6006 Feb 2009 - Submit the PCE MIB Internet-Draft to the IESG for consideration as Proposed Standard -> Work in progress Feb 2009 - Evaluate WG progress, recharter or close -> Action in progress with the chairs (ticket opened)

  6. Documents • Two new RFCs since Maastricht • RFC 6006: PCEP Extensions for P2MP TE-LSPs • RFC 6007: Synchronized VECtor List • IESG Processing • Inter-layer Requirements: publication requested • Manageability Section (Historic): announcement sent • Expired • Textual Conventions and Discovery MIB

  7. Not on the Agenda • draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req • solution (WG) I-D on the agenda • draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability • new WG I-D (addressing an old milestone) • draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext • implementations? • draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib • work in progress • draft-ietf-pce-vpn-req • waiting for solutions • draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints • interest seems to be still there: editing to be discussed

More Related