1 / 16

Ethical Relativism

Ethical Relativism. Nicole Sievert, Les Smith, Craig Mooney, Sherry Warner, Matt Nummerdor T: 1:30 Ethical Theories Presentation March 24, 2009. Book Definition.

ranee
Télécharger la présentation

Ethical Relativism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ethical Relativism Nicole Sievert, Les Smith, Craig Mooney, Sherry Warner, Matt Nummerdor T: 1:30 Ethical Theories Presentation March 24, 2009

  2. Book Definition Theory that morality is relative to norms of a culture. What is right or wrong depends on the norms of a society, and may not be morally right in another .

  3. Book Definition There are no universal moral standards that can be applied to all people at all times.

  4. So, basically, what is ethical for one person, may not be for someone else.What’s right for me and my culture won’t necessarily be what’s right for you and your culture. No moral principles are true for all people at all times and in all places

  5. Contributions and Influences • Herodotous • He obsevered different society and customs . • Each person thought their society had the best customs. • No custom was better off than the other.

  6. Contributions and Influences • Socrates • He was mocked for his plays of comic-drama. • His plays went against social norms. • He was a controversial figure. • He was sentenced to death by poison.

  7. Contributions and Influences • Friedrich Nietzsche • Rejected that human beliefs simply mirror reality. • Each of our beliefs is neither correct nor incorrect. • Only moral interpretations.

  8. Criticisms • W.T. Stace argues that: • ...if taken seriously and pressed to its logical conclusion, ethical relativity can only end in destroying morality altogether... in robbing human beings of any incentive to strive for a better world. (Ibid. p.195)

  9. Criticisms W.T. Stace also states…. If men come really to believe that one moral standard is as good as another, they will conclude that their own moral standard has nothing special to recommend it. They might as well then slip down to some lower and easier standard. (Ibid. p.195)

  10. Criticism • No universal moral criteria, no absolutes not even of tolerance. The supporters cannot promote the theory claim its acceptance will support tolerance of other cultures because it’s not necessarily a good thing. It is only a good thing in cultures where it is promoted. If people are raised in a culture where it is thought to be a good thing to be INTOLERANT, then that is what people should be.

  11. Criticism There are cultures where people believe that they are superior culture can abuse others people. So for that group of people tolerance is not a good thing.

  12. Current Ethical Dilemma • Each year hundreds of newborn girls in India are murdered by their mothers because they are female. • Some women believe that sacrificing a daughter guarantees a son in the next pregnancy. • Some families cannot afford the dowry demanded for a girl's marriage.

  13. Current Ethical Dilemma Under a "one-child policy," introduced in 1979 to help slow down the galloping population growth rate, parents are routinely sterilized and face large fines if they have more than one child. The government claims it has successfully prevented 250 million births since it was introduced.

  14. Current Ethical Dilemma Some places that openlyand legally, authorize active assistance in dying, are: Oregon (since l997, physician-assisted suicide); Switzerland (1941, physician and non-physician assisted suicide); Belgium (2002, permits 'euthanasia‘) Netherlands(2002 voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide).

  15. Current Ethical Dilemma The assisted suicides of an elderly British couple at a Swiss clinic rekindled the fierce debate Friday over whether Britain should modify its laws to allow terminally ill patients to end their lives with a doctor's help. The clinic was operating within Swiss federal law that gives people "the right to decide for themselves where and when they want to die."

  16. Questions?? • Abortion of newborn females is acceptable to Chinese culture for population control. Could that practice be ethically introduced in the United States? • Euthanasia is legal in Oregon. Could it become practiced more in the rest of United States? • Socrates was sentenced to death because he wrote plays against social norms. What could happen to people who go against social norms in today’s society?

More Related