1 / 8

Edmund Cannon

Edmund Cannon. Using Blackboard to accompany lectures. An unfashionable view of teaching technology. Fundamental issues. Officially we are meant to assess learning outcomes. But the official position evaporates when failure rates are high.

raquell
Télécharger la présentation

Edmund Cannon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Edmund Cannon Using Blackboard to accompany lectures

  2. An unfashionable view of teaching technology

  3. Fundamental issues • Officially we are meant to assess learning outcomes. But the official position evaporates when failure rates are high. • To what extent should students take responsibility for their own learning: is education • productivity enhancement; • enabling students to achieve autonomous ability; • pure signalling? • Heterogeneity of students.

  4. Blackboard for lecture notes • Lecture notes augment and improve lectures: • Filling in gaps, avoiding mistakes in notes; • Allow students to listen to the lecture; • Especially helpful for some students (dyslexic, etc). • Disadvantages: • Students become more passive (affects kinetic learning, handwriting skills); • Powerpoint displaces Word; • Students stay in bed • Lose benefits of the lecture • Don’t read the notes anyway (procrastination)

  5. A semi-controlled experiment • Compare two years of students. No difference in timetable for unit under discussion; virtually no change in anything else. • Compare second and fourth year that a unit ran. Same textbook, exam structure, mode of delivery, … • Two differences: • Larger year group (180 versus 130) • Powerpoint slides placed on BB after or before lecture

  6. What happened? Lecture attendance fell from 65% to 38% Failure rate rose from 15% to 22% (later adjusted to 20%) Proportion of firsts rose from 15% to 20%

  7. Is it possible to identify the effects? Even if putting powerpoint slides on BB is the only treatment effect then we cannot identify this from the selection effect. Using detailed data on the 2007 cohort, the strength of correlation between lecture attendance, BB usage and marks suggests an effect of 3 marks – but this may be entirely a selection effect.

  8. Questions • In the lecture: powerpoint versus chalk • On BB: powerpoint versus Word • Lecture attendance: • Does it matter • Should we do anything about it (hand holding?)

More Related