1 / 8

Barrier height:

V B. Barrier height:. Deformation parameter. Deformation parameter of the Lipkin Model. For q=0 one is dealing with the “spherical” system For q>0 one is dealing with the “deformed” system. For the exact solution, q =0 (why?).

Télécharger la présentation

Barrier height:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. VB Barrier height:

  2. Deformation parameter Deformation parameter of the Lipkin Model For q=0 one is dealing with the “spherical” system For q>0 one is dealing with the “deformed” system For the exact solution, q=0 (why?) Homework: calculate in the LM ground state. Compare with the HF deformation.

  3. signature doublet

  4. Signature of the Hartree-Fock State Ground-state signature • Signature is broken in the deformed HF solution • At large value of  signature is maximally broken! • (complete alignment of quasi-spin along the x-axis!)

  5. Note that Therefore, for an even number of fermions, Consequently, under the signature operation Let us now introduce the operator =1 Therefore, Pr is a projector!

  6. or where We demonstrated that Pr projects on good signature (or: restores signature symmetry) The projected energy can be written as In the following, we assume that

  7. Let us consider projected product states: We first note that the projected product states are not product states! Consequently, the projected ground-state (excited state) wave function is the symmetric (antisymmetric) combination of product states representing motion in the right and left potential well. By projecting out good signature, one is going beyond the class of product states of the Hartree-Fock method. Consequently, the projected energy will be lower than that of HF. Let us evaluate the matrix elements needed to compute the projected energy

  8. Homework: 1) using the method of SU(2) generating functions, calculate for arbitrary values of  and  ’. 2) Put  ‘=-  and compute the projected energy for the ground state and for the first excited state with r=-rg.s. 3) Assume two cases: a) Projection after variation (PAV), i.e.,  =HF b) Projection before variation (VAP), i.e., the projected energy is minimized with respect to  4) For various values of  compare HF energy, exact energy, PAV energy, and VAP energy of the Lipkin Model. 5) What can you conclude from this calculation?

More Related