1 / 29

Regional Data Snapshot

This data snapshot provides an overview of the Ozark Foothills Region in Missouri, including its target industry clusters and a shift-share analysis of the agribusiness, food processing and technology industries. It also highlights the top industry sectors, inputs, and occupations in the biomedical/biotechnical (life sciences) sector.

rconboy
Télécharger la présentation

Regional Data Snapshot

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Regional Data Snapshot Target Industry Clusters SET Session 2 Ozark Foothills Region, Missouri

  2. 01 02 03 Overview Table of contents Target Industry Clusters Industry Cluster Comparison

  3. 01 • overview • Ozark Foothills, MO

  4. Ozark Foothills Region, MO Overview • The Ozark Foothills Region is comprised of 5 Missouri counties. State Highway 60 connects the region to I-55 in the East. • Butler • Carter • Reynolds • Ripley • Wayne section 01

  5. 02 • target industry clusters Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Forest and Wood Products

  6. Regional Job Growth: Three Key Components of the Shift-Share Analysis Expected Change The sum of the industrial mix and the national growth effects Explains how much of the regional industry’s growth is explained by the overall growth of the national economy Share of regional industry growth explained by the growth of the specific industry sector at the national level Note: The calculations ensure no double counting of job change effects from national to regional levels Explains how much of the change in a given industry is due to some unique competitive advantage that the region possesses section 02 Source: EMSI Website, http://www.economicmodeling.com/2011/12/05/understanding-shift-share-2/

  7. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Shift-Share Analysis (Regional Performance) by Top Industry Sectors Note: Upward arrow ( ) indicates regional competitiveness. EMSI does not show sufficient number of jobs for Nitrogenous Fertilizer Manufacturing; Breweries; and Perishable Prepared Food Manufacturing. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  8. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Shift-Share Analysis Industries that Underperformed Industries that Outperformed • Crop Production • Farm Labor Contractors and Crew Leaders • Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing • Farm Supplies Merchant Wholesalers • Frozen Specialty Food Manufacturing • Ice Manufacturing • Mayonnaise, Dressing, and Other Prepared Sauce Manufacturing • Retail Bakeries • Soil Preparation, Planting, and Cultivating • Spice and Extract Manufacturing • Animal Production and Aquaculture • Farm and Garden Machinery and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  9. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Top Industry Sectors Note: Sorted similarly as the shift-share analysis slide. EMSI does not show sufficient number of jobs for Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing; Retail Bakeries; Nitrogenous Fertilizer Manufacturing; Breweries; and Perishable Prepared Food Manufacturing. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  10. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Top 15 Inputs by Dollars Note: * industry sector has less than 10 jobs as calculated by EMSI; ** industry sector is not present in the region. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  11. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Top 15 Inputs by Dollars Note: ** industry sector is not present in the region. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  12. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Top Occupations Note: SOC (Standard Occupation Classification) 5-digit occupations are included by jobs in 2014. Extended proprietors include estimates for underreported self employment, proprietorships, trusts, partnerships and cooperatives. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  13. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Shift-Share Analysis (Regional Performance) by Top Industry Sectors Note: Upward arrow ( ) indicates regional competitiveness. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  14. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Shift-Share Analysis Industries that Underperformed Industries that Outperformed • All Other Health and Personal Care Stores • All Other Outpatient Care Centers • General Medical and Surgical Hospitals • Home Health Care Services • Kidney Dialysis Centers • Medical Laboratories • Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) • Other Residential Care Facilities • Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers • Pharmacies and Drug Stores • Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals • Ambulance Services • Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly • Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies, and Perfume Stores • Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  15. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Top Industry Sectors Note: Sorted similarly as the shift-share analysis slide. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  16. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Top 15 Inputs by Dollars Note: * industry sector has less than 10 jobs as calculated by EMSI; ** industry sector is not present in the region. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  17. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Top 15 Inputs by Dollars Note: ** industry sector is not present in the region. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  18. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Top Occupations Note: SOC (Standard Occupation Classification) 5-digit occupations are included by jobs in 2014. Extended proprietors include estimates for underreported self employment, proprietorships, trusts, partnerships and cooperatives. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  19. Forest and Wood Products Shift-Share Analysis (Regional Performance) by Top Industry Sectors Note: Upward arrow ( ) indicates regional competitiveness. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  20. Forest and Wood Products Shift-Share Analysis Industries that Underperformed Industries that Outperformed • Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, and Planing • Flooring Contractors • Logging • Roofing Contractors • Support Activities for Forestry • Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and Gum and Wood Chemical Manufacturing • Finish Carpentry Contractors • Forest Nurseries and Gathering of Forest Products • Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers • Nonupholstered Wood Household Furniture Manufacturing • Sawmills • Timber Tract Operations • Wood Container and Pallet Manufacturing • Wood Kitchen Cabinet and Countertop Mfg. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  21. Forest and Wood Products Top Industry Sectors Note: Sorted similarly as the shift-share analysis slide. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  22. Forest and Wood Products Top 15 Inputs by Dollars Note: * industry sector has less than 10 jobs as calculated by EMSI; ** industry sector is not present in the region. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  23. Forest and Wood Products Top 15 Inputs by Dollars Note: ** industry sector is not present in the region. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  24. Forest and Wood Products Top Occupations Note: SOC (Standard Occupation Classification) 5-digit occupations are included by jobs in 2014. Extended proprietors include estimates for underreported self employment, proprietorships, trusts, partnerships and cooperatives. section 02 • Source: EMSI Class of Worker 2016.4 (QCEW, non-QCEW, self-employed and extended proprietors).

  25. 03 • Cluster Comparisons Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Forest and Wood Products

  26. Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology Contribution by Counties (Jobs, 2015) Reynolds 353 Wayne 651 Carter 228 750 Butler 480 Ripley section 03 • Source: EMSI 2016.4 (QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors); Industry cluster definitions by PCRD

  27. Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) Contribution by Counties (Jobs, 2015) Reynolds 235 Wayne 302 Carter 79 Butler Ripley 2,421 265 section 03 • Source: EMSI 2016.4 (QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors); Industry cluster definitions by PCRD

  28. Forest and Wood Products Contribution by Counties (Jobs, 2015) Reynolds 394 Wayne 147 Carter 290 Butler Ripley 205 297 section 03 • Source: EMSI 2016.4 (QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors); Industry cluster definitions by PCRD

  29. Industry Clusters: Components to Assess section 03 • Source: EMSI 2016.4 (QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors); Industry cluster definitions by PCRD

More Related