1 / 13

Fiscal & Revenue Proposals for 2012/13 Submission by Business Unity SA

Fiscal & Revenue Proposals for 2012/13 Submission by Business Unity SA to the Standing Committee on Finance & Select Committee on Finance. Presented by Prof. Raymond Parsons BUSA Deputy CEO 28 February 2012. INTRODUCTION. Economic Overview Positive Features of the Budget

rcontreras
Télécharger la présentation

Fiscal & Revenue Proposals for 2012/13 Submission by Business Unity SA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fiscal & Revenue Proposals for 2012/13 Submission by Business Unity SA to the Standing Committee on Finance & Select Committee on Finance Presented by Prof. Raymond Parsons BUSA Deputy CEO 28 February 2012

  2. INTRODUCTION • Economic Overview • Positive Features of the Budget • Some Vulnerabilities and Risks in the 2012 Budget

  3. ECONOMIC OVERVIEWGlobal Economic Outlook • BUSA shares the Minister’s assessment of SA’s economic prospects – similar to BUSA’s submission on 15 Feb • Global economic outlook marginally better • Domestic economy remains vulnerable to a volatile global environment • Asymmetric growth remains between developed countries and developing economies (China, India) • BUSA agrees that SA needs to be competitive in a changing world • This will require flexibility, innovation and leadership in both public and private sectors

  4. ECONOMIC OVERVIEWDomestic Economic Outlook • BUSA agrees: real GDP 2.7% in 2012, possibly rising to >3% in 2013 • But these positive growth rates inadequate to meet socio-economic challenges • Unemployment remains high at 23.9% • 850 000 new jobs projected to be created over next 3 years – 75% in the private sector • Budget rightly adopts pro-growth stance

  5. POSITIVE FEATURES OF THE 2012 BUDGETGeneral Approach • BUSA views 2012/13 Budget as credible, broadly balanced and confidence building • BUSA welcomes recognition of the “substantial role” of private sector in growth and job creation • Emphasis on the need for policy direction to be certain, predictable and coherent • Budget creates “window of opportunity” to do things differently and better • Budget should encourage longer term perspective on SA’s growth and development, and required policy changes

  6. POSITIVE FEATURES OF THE 2012 BUDGETSpecific Positive Aspects • Debt profile appears more sustainable • Commitment to keep fiscus on sustainable track • Central priority on expanded infrastructure • PPP framework sound • Forthcoming Infrastructure Summit • Tax relief for SMMEs • Support for improved competitiveness • Mining – emphasis on need to leverage buoyancy in commodity markets • Anti-fraud and anti-corruption initiatives • Further engagement on carbon tax • Efforts to reduce economic impact of Gauteng tolls • Support for local municipalities • Realistic phasing in of NHI and social security reform • Emphasis on Youth Wage Subsidy Scheme -> 178000 new jobs • Pre-budget consultation with Nedlac - mutually valuable

  7. SOME VULNERABILITIES & RISKS IN THE BUDGETKeeping recurrent state spending under control • Headline fiscal ratios appear healthy but can mask vulnerabilities • State debt costs remain fastest growing item of state spending • Further accidents to growth and/or interest rates could push ratio of gross debt to GDP to danger limit of 50% • Debt trap could become significant risk, jeopardising development goals

  8. SOME VULNERABILITIES & RISKS IN THE BUDGETImplementing the Infrastructural Programme • Achilles' heel: possible failure to create “a capable state focussed on delivery” • Minister has acknowledged weaknesses in the rollout of infrastructure projects • BUSA supports emphasis in Budget & NDP on professionalism in the public service • Ways in which private sector can assist should be explored • Administered prices • Cumulative effect of excessive rises negatively impacting economic performance • SONA acknowledgment of electricity price challenge welcomed • Better planned and coordinated approach to issues of affordability is needed • SOEs • Essential that their role be appropriately defined and managed • Report from Presidential Commission on the Performance of SOEs • Need to enlarge investor base and develop cost-effective financing models

  9. SOME VULNERABILITIES & RISKS IN THE BUDGETTax and related changes • Lack of prior consultation on tax changes -> difficulty in anticipating unintended consequences for the economy • Combined impact of: • Increase in fuel levy • Increase in electricity levy • Imposition of e-tolls could seriously impact some sectors (e.g. transport, travel & tourism) - Parliament may need to interrogate these aspects with sectors concerned • Recent changes to tax legislation have increased complexity of tax assessments

  10. SOME VULNERABILITIES & RISKS IN THE BUDGETSocial Spending • Remains essential to maintain effective social safety net • Budget Speech: social spending comprises 58% of government expenditure, up from 49% in 2002 • 1/3 of SA population receives a grant • Minister: redistribution is “not a substitute for economic growth and job creation” • The more SA can push up growth & employment, the less dependence there will be on welfare

  11. CONCLUSION • Most important lesson of global economic crises: - peril of procrastination • NGP, NDP and 2012 Budget must help create an environment which encourages long–term thinking • Following 2012 Budget: SA must implement effectively what has been agreed and funded • BUSA remains pledged to assist government wherever possible

  12. Hamlet’s version of SA’s Economic Priorities “To grow, or not to grow – that is the question. Whether ‘tis nobler for the economy to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous global markets. Or take arms against a sea of internal troubles, and by opposing them – to end them? To delay – to procrastinate no more – and by effective delivery to say we end the heart-ache and the thousand shocks the SA economy is heir to. ‘Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished.” (With apologies to Shakespeare)

  13. Thank you

More Related