1 / 23

IADSR International Conference 2012

IADSR International Conference 2012. Aiwan-e-Iqbal Lahore, Pakistan 27–29 April 2012. Choosing a Journal and Publishing an Article. Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH AuthorAID at INASP ( www.authoraid.info ) and Texas A&M University. Overview. Deciding what (or when) to publish

rea
Télécharger la présentation

IADSR International Conference 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IADSR International Conference 2012 Aiwan-e-Iqbal Lahore, Pakistan 27–29 April 2012

  2. Choosing a Journal and Publishing an Article Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH AuthorAID at INASP (www.authoraid.info) and Texas A&M University

  3. Overview • Deciding what (or when) to publish • Identifying a target journal • Following the journal’s instructions • Submitting the paper • Understanding the decision process • Revising a paper • Answering queries • Reviewing proofs

  4. Deciding What (or When) to Publish • Some factors to consider: quality of the work, extent of the work, interest to others • Suggestions: • Seek guidance in this regard from others in your field who are more experienced in publishing journal articles. • Present your work orally first. Doing so can help in deciding whether the work is publishable and in shaping the paper.

  5. Identifying a Target Journal • Decide early (before drafting the paper). Do not write the paper and then look for a journal. • Look for journals that have published work similar to yours. • Consider journals that have published work that you will cite.

  6. Some Factors to Consider • Audience • Prestige • Access • Impact • Publication time • Quality of reproduction • Likelihood of acceptance

  7. Journals’ Instructions to Authors • Usual locations: in the journal and on the journal’s Web site • A collection of instructions from biomedical journals, including dental journals: http://mulford.meduohio.edu/instr/ • Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: http://www.icmje.org/

  8. Using the Journal’s Instructions • Read the instructions to authors before starting to prepare your paper. • Consult the instructions while preparing your paper. • Check the instructions again before submitting your paper.

  9. Some Questions the Instructions May Answer • What categories of article does the journal publish? • What is the maximum length of articles? • What is the maximum length of abstracts? • Does the journal have a template for articles? If so, how can it be accessed? • What sections should the article include? What are the guidelines for each?

  10. Some Questions (cont) • What guidelines should be followed regarding writing style? • How many figures and tables are allowed? What are the requirements for them? • In what format should references appear? Is there a maximum number of references? • In what electronic format should the paper be prepared?

  11. Beyond the Instructions • Look at some recent issues of the journal. Doing so can help you gear your paper to the journal.

  12. The IMRAD Formatfor Scientific Papers • Introduction: What was the question? • Methods: How did you try to answer it? • Results: What did you find? • And • Discussion: What does it mean?

  13. A More Complete View • (Title) • (Authors) • (Abstract) • Introduction • Methods • Results • Discussion • (Acknowledgments) • (References)

  14. IMRAD Structure:Like an Hourglass • Introduction: starts by talking broadly about your topic and then narrows down to your own research • Methods: narrow—focuses on your research • Results: narrow—focuses on your research • Discussion: starts narrow (with your own research) and then broadens to discuss others’ research and then wider implications

  15. Submitting the Paper • Traditional submission (by mail)—now rare • Electronic submission • Commonly via online submission system • Sometimes as e-mail attachment • Inclusion of a cover letter (conventional or electronic) • Completion of required forms

  16. Some Categories of Editorsat Journals • Helpful to know because you might interact with each • Main categories: • Editor-in-chief (and sometimes associate editors etc)—concerned mainly with content • Managing editor(s)—concerned mainly with administration of the journal • Manuscript editor(s)—improve the writing and maintain a consistent style

  17. Initial Screening by the Journal • For appropriateness of subject matter • For compliance with instructions • For overall quality (sometimes)

  18. Peer Review • Evaluation by experts in the field • Purposes: • To help the editor decide whether to publish the paper • To help the authors improve the paper, whether or not the journal accepts it

  19. The Editor’s Decision • Based on the peer reviewers’ advice, the editor’s own evaluation, the amount of space in the journal, other factors • Options: • Accept as is (rare) • Accept if suitably revised • Reconsider if revised • Reject

  20. Revising a Paper • Revise and resubmit promptly. • Indicate what revisions were made. • Include a letter saying what revisions were made. If you received a list of requested revisions, address each in the letter. • If requested, show revisions in Track Changes. • If you disagree with a requested revision, explain why in your letter. Try to find a different way to solve the problem that the editor or reviewer noted.

  21. Answering Queries • Queries: questions from the manuscript editor • Some topics of queries: • Inconsistencies • Missing information • Ambiguities • Other • Advice: Respond promptly, politely, and completely yet concisely.

  22. Reviewing Proofs • Proofs: typeset material to check • Review the proofs promptly. • Some things to check: • Completeness (presence of all components) • Accuracy (absence of typographical errors in text and references) • Placement of figures and tables • Quality of reproduction of figures • Note: This is not the time to rewrite the paper.

  23. A Final Step Celebrate Publication of Your Paper!

More Related