WP7 Summary: Development of QA-RA in KM3NeT

1. KM3NeT WP7 Meeting, Pylos (Greece), 16-18 January 2007: WP7:RISK ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE WP7 Summary: Development of QA-RA in KM3NeT R. Garaguso, M. Morganti C. Sollima INFN-University of Pisa

2. Contents • Roadmap • Membership and activities performed • Results • Future activities KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

3. RA road map QA road map • Deepstudy of the Project to identify the processes involved • RA Questionnaire • Functional Analysis of the processes • Division of the Project in Units, Sub-Units, Components and Elements • FMEA/FMECA standards and methodology study and analysis (process & project) • Implement FMEA/FMECA • Compensating provisions & remarks in RA deviations according to KM3NeT specifications • Deep study of the Project to identify the needed standards and normative for each process • Collection and selection of several suitable normative and standards (ISO CD-ROM) • Link between the different normative and standards and its applications • QAQuestionnaire • Implement QA • Development of a preliminary QA manual according to KM3NeT specifications WP7: QA & RA Program DIAGRAM KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

4. Membership • INFN (Stefano Cecchini) • NCSRD (Ioannis A. Papazoglou ) • CEA-Saclay (Frédéric Louis ) • IN2P3 (Laurence Caillat) KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

5. WPs cross-link • INTERFACE: it is proposed to have one QA/RA responsible for each WP and per country. He refers directly to the WP7 • Steering Committee: • Representative of the partners of the WP7: C. Sollima, S. Cecchini, I.A.Papazoglou, Frédéric Louis, L. Caillat • WP7 Meetings: twice per year KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

6. WP 7 activities: Starting Point 1.) Deep study of the overall Project to identify the WPs’ links 2.) RA & QA activities are carried out in the framework of the KM3NeT Project: • to increase the knowledge about the submarine technologies and neutrinos detection (lesson learned from ANTARES, NEMO & NESTOR Projects) (meetings were done in Paris, Marseille, Aberdeen and Italy) • to prove the reliability of the RA & QA methodology (from the PCC meeting of October 2006, application to the on going project) • to identify the weakest points KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

7. WP 7 activities performed: QA • Analysis of the ANTARES project • QA should start with the design study to be ready for the production • Analysis of the NEMO project • Application of the QA and RA methodology developed to: • Define and diffuse the “Quality Culture” overall the WPs • Obtained a common standardisation by an integrated strategy among the different WPs. KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

8. WP 7 results Development of the QA applications for KM3NET • QA index • QA questionare • Plan activities form (preliminary) • Test form (preliminary) Development of the RA methodology for KM3NET • Plan of the activities (RA CDR) • Example of FEMCA (methodology) to the Optical module (Antares/NEMO-1) KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

9. Quality manual Documented procedures Work instructions Forms Quality plans Specifications External documents Records WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

10. WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals IDENTIFICATION /TRACEABILITY KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

11. WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals • Macro Area • Process Analysis • Functional Analysis • Quality Control • Tools KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

12. WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals Macro Area – example (to be discussed) • Infrastuctures • Electronics • Software • Logistic • (Suppliers) KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

13. WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals Processes Analysis (1 of 2) Unit, Subunit, Element, Item (USEI) • Requirements • Specifications • Designs Prototype • Production Preproduction Production • Test (Including System) • Integration IN • Storage OUT KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

14. WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals Processes Analysis (2 of 2) Unit, Subunit, Element, Item (USEI) • Packaging • Transport Shore Operations • Deployment Off Shore Operations • Recovery • Suppliers • Interfaces KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

15. WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals Structural Functional Analysis Example Data Acquisition • Optical Module Power Supply Instrumentation Boa Anchor • Structural Layout Structural Interface Electronics Power Supply Data Acquisition • Connections Control • Software Structural (Interface and Cable) • Logistic Layout KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

16. WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals • Design • Suppliers Quality Control • Logistic • Production • Software • Acceptance • Storage • Integration • Test • Packaging • Delivering KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

17. WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals Tools Proposed Process • Flow Diagrams Logistic • Block Diagrams • Questionnaires • Audit • Software (Database, etc.) • Functional tree • Product tree KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

18. WP 7 QA activities: How to reach the goals Just to recall • QUALITY = Requirements definition • QUALITY ASSURANCE = To plan the actions to achieve the requirements defined • QUALITY CONTROL = Measurement of the results achieved with reference to the requirements defined KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

19. WP7: RA Objectives & Road Map for KM3NeT • Objectives • Define the mission of the neutrino telescope in quantifiable terms; • Assess specific scenarios (sequences of events) that can lead to the inability of the system to perform its mission; • Assess the probability of each and every scenario. • Road Map Risk Analysis involves three major stages: • Collect project/processes data; • Assessment of the undesired consequences of a potential set of actions; • Assessment of the probability that these consequences may obtain. KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

20. WP7: Risk Analysis Actual Activities FMECA ANALYSIS Qualitative Example (related to PCC Rome Meeting Request) Analyzed Component : Optical Module Hypothesis: • OM into its environmental conditions (working life); • Components cant’be repair (MTBF=MTTF=1/λ) • Criticality Analysis is only qualitative and based on MIL-STD 1629 A normative ; • Objects Information are based on the available licterature(there are not yet available risk data). Goals: • Give remarks about possible test benchs development to simulate the Failure Causes put in evidence; • Focus on Risk parameters needed. KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

21. WP7: Risk Analysis Actual Activities FMECA ANALYSIS Steps • Explode the Objects under analysis in all its parts (through a filled Questionnaires) • Build up FMECA TABLE by using modified MIL-STD 1629 A worksheet • Put in evidence the relevant functions by logical flow diagram • Brainstorming on potential failure modes, causes and effects • Allocate severity level and probability of occurrence using MIL-STD-1629 A reference tables • Build Up “Criticality Matrix” • Give final remarks KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

22. WP7: General RA Conclusion • Although Qualitative,Criticality Matrix focuses on : Possible Criticality, using color rankingfrom Red (unacceptable condition) to Green (acceptable without revision) Objects ordered by criticalities • Although Qualitative, Criticality Matrix gives a priority to the objects tests (related to the failure causes) based on the above ranking • Example of procedure after FMECA results: • Step 1) rank Criticality level by unacceptable to acceptable • Step 2) Calculate experimental MTBF from the worst to the better condition • Step 3) Verify availability and find solution to improve, if is necessary KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

23. WP 7 results 1 of 2 The work performed outlines that for a correct application of the QA and RA, it is needed to develop in the design study: • Functional analysis • Definition of the requirementes • Definition of the technical specifications It means interaction with the WPs KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

24. WP 7 results 1 of 2 The QA/RA needs to define the reliability level to be reach. It is translated in: • Tests to be performed • Relation with the suppliers, which • Tests they should perform • Certificate they should release • Level of non conformity we consider acceptable • Definition of the preproduction and production specifications KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

25. WP7:RISK ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE WE HAVE A DREAM: “Let us try” KM3NET WP7 Motto "Design Study for a Deep Sea Facility in the Mediterranean for Neutrino Astronomy and Associated Sciences” KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

26. WP7:RISK ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE THANK VERY MUCH FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION "Design Study for a Deep Sea Facility in the Mediterranean for Neutrino Astronomy and Associated Sciences” KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

27. WP 7 future activities • Draft CDR contribution describing the standards and the quality evaluation method for all the Design Study procedures and initial results of the FMECA RA studies (16 month) • Deepstudy of the Project (July 2006) • Collection of several normative and standards (June 2006) • Selection of the suitable normative and its application (ISO) (May 2006) • QA & RAQuestionnaire (May 2006) • Development of a preliminary QA manual (July 2006) • Preliminary Standard Data-Base model (June 2006) • FMEA/FMECA standards and methodology study (July 2006) KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting

28. Work plan: WPs cross-link WP1 • Project Management • Policy Statement • QA & RA Management • QAP and RA Development • Procedures (General) • Audit • Data Base of the Final Documents WP7 • QA & RA Interface • QC (Development and Application) • Procedures (General &/or Detailed) • Data Base of the Work Documents WPi KM3NeT : Colaboration meeting