230 likes | 460 Vues
Cross-cultural issues in Management. Dr Joan Harvey. Geert Hofstede. Dutch social anthropologist Obtained attitude data from IBM worldwide in late 1970s Factor analysed and looked for factors which differentiated nationalities Data on 50 countries, but only sufficient N for 40 in first book.
E N D
Cross-cultural issues in Management Dr Joan Harvey
Geert Hofstede • Dutch social anthropologist • Obtained attitude data from IBM worldwide in late 1970s • Factor analysed and looked for factors which differentiated nationalities • Data on 50 countries, but only sufficient N for 40 in first book
Geert Hofstede • Originally four main factors • Masculinity femininity • Ambition and desire to achieve versus social concern and interpersonal relationships • Power distance • Amount of power that can be wielded • Uncertainty avoidance • inflexibility • Individualism- collectivism • Help and commitment versus high personal achievement • and later added [in 1990s] • LT-ST orientation [Confucian dynamism]
Geert Hofstede • Issues: • Study was based in 1970s and many countries have changed a lot since then- has this affected their orientation? • Eastern European changes • Some developing countries are now developed • Others have changed politically- e.g. South Africa
Geert Hofstede • Issues: • All countries will have changed anyway in nearly 30 years • Changes in technology and global communication • Migration of peoples • Are cross-cultural differences still as pronounced?
Geert Hofstede • Issues: • This study put cross-cultural differences into the mainstream rather than “error variance” in other studies • Encouraged other theorists, e.g. Trompenaars • Recent developments with studies all over the world have increased considerably the number of countries that have been mapped
Examples of other theories: [a] Trompenaars 7 factors: • Universalism versus particularism • Work relationships mixed with personal ones • Individualism versus collectivism • Affective versus neutral culture • Specific versus diffuse relationships • Distinct relationships versus diffuse ones • Achieving versus ascribing status • Earned through achievement or recognised e.g. seniority/age • Perception of time • Sequential [monochronic] or parallel [polychronic] • Relating to nature
Example [b] GLOBAL project • Assertiveness • Future orientation • Gender egalitarianism • Humane orientation • Institutional collectivism • In-group collectivism • Performance orientation • Power distance • Uncertainty avoidance
Two more factors that are interrelated. • Time perception • Polychronic or cyclical [e.g. southern Europe, China, Japan] • Monochronic [e.g. northern Europe, US] • Context • High means that perception of what is said is taken in context, including NVCs • Low means words are interpreted literally
Other dimensions from indigenous social psychology • China • Confucian values • Filial piety • Industriousness • Giving and protecting face • Guanxi • Social networking crucial to business relationships • Ren ching • Respectful exchange of gifts, favours and obligations
Other dimensions • Japan • Amae and respect • Reliance and dependence upon indulgent love of an older person • Kanban • Concept of whole transcending sum of parts • Ringi • Upward communications and decision making • Sacred treasures- • life time employment, seniority, enterprise unions/families • Harmony and cooperation [‘wa’] • Gakureki Shakai • Social system attaching value to education
Other dimensions • Africa • Cognitive tolerance • Not on seat • Africa time • Indaba [Malawi] • Ubuntu [Malawi] • Tribal loyalty • Power and respect based on experience • Managers ‘right to manage’
Other dimensions • Several cultures resent ‘intrusiveness’ of western values, western research methods, e.g. • Philippines • Sub-Saharan Africa
Other dimensions • Latin American countries: emphasis on • Respect • Family • Hierarchy • Honour • Affiliative obedience • Cultural rigidity • Machismo • Sympatia
Other dimensions • India • Detachment as a coping mechanism, therefore working hard is unrelated to success or failure • Ingratiation techniques to advance personal goals within hierarchical collective context • [similar to parts of western Africa]
Example area1 : Expatriate workers • Qualities for success hard to define, e.g. Brislin [1981] • Cognitive ability • Task orientation • Tolerant personality • Strength of personality, include self esteem • Relations with others, include empathy • Potential to benefit from cross-cultural experience, including openness to change
Expatriate worker qualities • Mendenhall and Oddou [1985] • Self-orientatedness • Self esteem, Self confidence, Mental adjustment • Other orientatedness • Ability to interact and develop relationships • Perceptual factors • Empathy, being non-judgemental • Cultural toughness • Ability to adjust to very different culture
Expatriate training • Hofstede suggests: • Awareness • Additional knowledge • skills • Training methods • Cultural assimilators • Cultural analysis systems • Contrast [American] method train in opposites
Expatriation success or failure measures • Expatriation satisfaction and rate of early returns • Expatriate adaptation and adjustment • Expatriate job performance • Determinants of above include • Adjustment of spouse and family • Developing specific coping strategies • Accurate understanding of rules, customs, behaviours and attributions • Being able to tolerate cultural differences with which Expatriate may totally disagree
Example 2 : Theory Z • Application of Japanese management principles to American & British businesses • Long term focus • Zero tolerance • Personal responsibility for self-development • Positive attitudes to seniority • Teamwork rather than individual achievement • Commitment and trust • Quality and pride • Multi-skilling
Example 3: R & S • Issues include: • Gender inequalities, especially in ‘masculine’ societies [e.g. poorer promotion prospects for women in Japan, France, etc] • Specific types of favouritism, but not considered nepotism in some cultures, e.g. • China • India • Sub-Saharan Africa
Example 3: R & S • Differences in emphasis on methods, e.g. • Assessment Centres and Biodata • Graphology • References • And in selection criteria • Team member opinions • Same tribal group • Word of mouth
Key text Hofstede G and Hofstede G (2005) Culture and Organizations: Software of the mind. 2nd edn London: McGraw Hill This book has been published in Czech, translated by Dr Ludek Kolman