1 / 19

Dr. N. Birkett, Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine, University of Ottawa

EPI 5344: Survival Analysis in Epidemiology Epi Methods: why does ID involve person-time? March 13, 2014. Dr. N. Birkett, Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine, University of Ottawa. The Issue (1). Epidemiology focuses on: Incidence Proportion or Cumulative Incidence (CI)

reina
Télécharger la présentation

Dr. N. Birkett, Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine, University of Ottawa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EPI 5344:Survival Analysis in EpidemiologyEpi Methods: why does ID involve person-time?March 13, 2014 Dr. N. Birkett, Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine, University of Ottawa

  2. The Issue (1) • Epidemiology focuses on: • Incidence Proportion or Cumulative Incidence (CI) • Incidence Density or Incidence Rate (ID). • Standard formulae are:

  3. The Issue (2) • How do these measures relate to survival analysis? • Why does ID involve person-time?

  4. Incidence Density (rate) • Rate of getting disease. • A number with units (time-1) • Ranges from 0  ∞ • Often measured from time ‘0’ (recruitment) • Can be measured for any time interval • Separate ID’s for each year of follow-up • If the time units get smaller, we approach the ‘instantaneous ID’

  5. Incidence Density (rate) • Rate of getting disease (outcome) at time ‘t’ given (conditional on) on having survived to time ‘t’ • Instantaneous ID is the same as the hazard • Average ID is more common in epidemiology

  6. Epidemiology formulae ignore ID variability over time and compute average ID (ID`) • Actuarial method (density method) lets each interval have a different ID • Linked to piecewise exponential model

  7. Why does ID relate to person-time? • Let’s look at a simple situation (assumption): • No losses (i.e. no censoring) • A constant ID over time (I) • Then, we have:

  8. Why does ID relate to person-time?

  9. So, how can we figure out the area under S(t)? • Let’s look at the next page

  10. Graph of S(t) Actually a curve but we assume it’s a straight line Area under S(t) from 0 to 1

  11. In general, area under S(t) from ‘0’ to ‘t’ is given by: How does this help? In the formula we derived for ID, multiply top and bottom by ‘N’ (the initial # of people at risk) Now, CI(t) * N = # new cases by time ‘t’.

  12. This is the standard Epidemiology definition of ID

  13. Person-time approach to ID assumes that ID (hazard) is constant • Can be seen as estimating an average ID • BUT, constant hazard gives the exponential survival model which does not reflect real-world S(t)’s.

  14. Why does epidemiology ignore this and use a constant ID? • Lack of data • Lack of measurement precision • Tradition • ”teaching” • Old fashioned methods or learning by rote • What can we do? • Piece-wise constant hazard approach is better • Density methods • Survival methods

  15. Density method (1) GOAL: to estimate CI for outcome by year ‘t*’ • Select a time interval (usually 1 year) • Divide follow-up time into intervals of this size • Within each interval, compute the ID of surviving the interval given you are disease-free at start:

  16. Density method (2) • Compute: • Then, we have:

  17. Density method (3) • Very similar to the methods based on H(t). • When h(t) is piecewise constant, we have:

More Related