1 / 39

Raknehaugen

Raknehaugen. Samuel Neukomm Mads W. Toft Bjørn Bergman Anita Turesson. Purpose looking for archaeological features near the mound Investigation site flat area on southern side of the mound meadow with few trees and bushes no geophysical investigation before

rendor
Télécharger la présentation

Raknehaugen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Raknehaugen • Samuel Neukomm • Mads W. Toft • Bjørn Bergman • Anita Turesson

  2. Purpose looking for archaeological features near the mound Investigation site flat area on southern side of the mound meadow with few trees and bushes no geophysical investigation before Mound 15m high, 80m across several excavations within last 150 years consists of varying types of soil, sand and layers of timber Methods GPR, Magnetics EM 31 CVES information about mound mapping shallow targets

  3. A C B General Picture of Field A, B & C

  4. Laser theodolite Recording unit Antennas Laser beam 50 X /m/ Optical signal cables 0 196° N N 8,75 Laser beam reflector 22,50 Y Sledge Recording system setup for the 3D radar measurements at Raknehaugen, Ullensaker, Norway.

  5. Data Acquisition Parameters for GPR’ Sysyem: Pulsekko 100, Sensors & Software Antenna: 200 MHz centre frequency Antenna: 0.80 m Profile seperation: 0.25 m Trace interval: 0.20 m Measured area: 50 x 22 m

  6. Overview of Raknehaugen site

  7. P ro c es si ng st eps fo r no rt h t o sou t h t es t pro fil e w i t h a 100 M H z no mi na l f r equen c y an t enn a . 1 Z ero tim e s e t t o 3,33 ns 2 B a nd pa s s f ilt e r c orne r f r eq. 15 - 30-60 - 120 M Hz 3 E nergy decay ga i n , f ac t o r 1 Unprocessed data from the test profile with a 100 Mhz antenna Processed data from the test profile with a 100 Mhz antenna Test profile using a 100 MHz antenna

  8. P ro c es si ng st eps fo r s ou t h t o nor t h t es t pro fil e w i t h a 200 M H z no mi na l f r equen c y an t enn a . 1 Z ero tim e s e t t o 2,67 ns r 20 - 170 M Hz 2 B a nd pa s s bu t t e rwo rt h filt e 3 C r os s c or r e l a ti on, de fi n i ng s ign al , 3-4 m , 43 t o 52 ns 4 E nergy decay ga i n , f ac t o r 1 Unprocessed data from the test profile with a 200 Mhz antenna Processed data from the test profile with a 200 Mhz antenna Test profile using a 200 MHz antenna

  9. P ro c es si ng st eps fo r 3 D m ea s ur em en t s w i th a 200 M Hz no mi na l f r equen c y an t enn a . 1 Z ero tim e s e t t o 2,67 ns 2 B a nd pa s s f ilt e r c orne r f r eq. 10 - 20-120 - 240 M Hz 3 Deconvo l u ti on t i me w i ndow 15-30 ns 4 E nergy decay ga i n , f ac t o r 1 No m ig r a ti on was done, howeve r, s om e ve l oc iti e s w e re i den ti f ie d us i ng t he d iff ra ct ing hype r bo l as i n t he t es t pro fil e us i ng 200 MH z an t enn a . T he ve l o c i t y p i cked was c . 0 , 059 – 0,062 nm /s . S ee fi gu r e b e lo w . A l so i d e nt ifi ed i s t h e r ef le c ti on f ro m nea r by tr ee s w it h ar e a s s i gned t he v e lo ci ty o f li gh t i n a i r c . 0 , 298 n s / m . Processing step for the 3D radar data

  10. Y= 0 Y= 1,5 Y= 3,0 Y= 4,5

  11. Y= 6,0 Y= 7,5 Y= 8,75

  12. Overview of Raknehaugen site

  13. Nominated: ”Worst field dresser”

  14. Data Acquisition Parameters for Mag. and EM-31 mearurements • MAGNETICS Line spacing: 50 cm Sampling rate: 5 sampels/sec • EM-31 • Line spacing: 1 m • Inline sampling density: 1 m • Operating frequency: 9.8 kHz

  15. Relativ intensity of magnetic data

  16. Field A, Magnetic Gradient

  17. Field B, Magnetic Gradient and EM-31

  18. Field C, Magnetic gradient and EM-31

  19. Small magnetic gradient variations

  20. Overview of Raknehaugen site

  21. CVES profile across Raknehaugen mound • 1 profile across the mound, 160m long • profile direction approximately SW - NE • electrode spacing 1m • data acquisition with Wenner configuration • aMIN=1m, aMAX=48m

  22. CVES survey Raknehaugen

  23. Conclusions • Good correlation between GPR and Mag. • Good correlation between EM-31 and Mag. • No archeological features identified.

  24. HAPPY END !!!!!!

More Related