1 / 28

A reaction-advection-diffusion equation from chaotic chemical mixing

A reaction-advection-diffusion equation from chaotic chemical mixing. Junping Shi 史峻平 Department of Mathematics College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA 23187 ,USA. Math 490 Presentation, April 11, 2006,Tuesday. Reference Paper 1: Neufeld, et al, Chaos, Vol 12, 426-438, 2002.

reuel
Télécharger la présentation

A reaction-advection-diffusion equation from chaotic chemical mixing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A reaction-advection-diffusion equation from chaotic chemical mixing Junping Shi史峻平 Department of Mathematics College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA 23187,USA Math 490 Presentation, April 11, 2006,Tuesday

  2. Reference Paper 1:Neufeld, et al, Chaos, Vol 12, 426-438, 2002

  3. Reference paper 2: Menon, et al, Phys. Rev. E. Vol 71, 066201, 2005

  4. Reference Paper 3:Shi and Zeng, preprint, 2006

  5. Model • The spatiotemporal dynamics of interacting biological or chemical substances is governed by the system of reaction-advection-diffusion equations: where i=1,2,….n, C_i(x,t) is the concentration of the i-th chemical or biological component, f_i represents the interaction between them. All these species live a an advective flow v(x,t), which is independent of concentration of chemicals. Da, the Damkohler number, characterizes the ratio between the advective and the chemical or biological time scales. Large Da corresponds to slow stirring or equivalently fast chemical reactions and vice versa. The Peclet number, Pe, is a measure of the relative strength of advective and diffusive transport.

  6. Some numerical simulationsby Neufeld et. al. Chaos paper

  7. Arguments to derive a new equation • At any point in 2-D domain, there is a stable direction where the spatial pattern is squeezed, and there is an unstable direction where the pattern converges to • The stirring process smoothes out the concentration of the advected tracer along the stretching direction, whilst enhancing the concentration gradients in the convergent direction. • In the convergent direction we have the following one dimensional equation for the average profile of the filament representing the evolution of a transverse slice of the filament in a Lagrangian reference frame (following the motion of a fluid element).

  8. One-dimensional model Here C(x,t) is the concentration of chemical on the line, and we assume F(C)=C(1-C), which corresponds to an autocatalytic chemical reaction A+B -> 2A. We also assume the zero boundary conditions for C at infinity.

  9. Numerical Experiments • Software: Maple • Algorithm: build-in PDE solver • Spatial domain: -20<x<20 (computer can’t do infinity) • Grid size: 1/40 • Boundary condition: u(-20,t)=u(20,t)=0 • Strategy: test the simulations under different D and different initial conditions

  10. Numerical Result 1: D=0.5, u(0,x)=exp(-(x-2)^2)+exp(-(x+2)^2)

  11. Numerical Result 2: D=1.5, u(0,x)=exp(-(x-2)^2)+exp(-(x+2)^2)

  12. Numerical Result 3: D=10, u(0,x)=exp(-(x-2)^2)+exp(-(x+2)^2)

  13. Observation of numerical results: different D • For small D, the chemical concentration tends to zero • For larger D, the chemical concentration tends to a positive equilibrium • The positive equilibrium nearly equal to 1 in the central part of real line, and nearly equals to 0 for large |x|. The width of its positive part increases as D increases. Now Let’s compare different initial conditions

  14. Numerical Result 4: D=40, u(0,x)=exp(-(x-2)^2)+exp(-(x+2)^2)

  15. Numerical Result 5: D=40, u(0,x)= 2*exp(-2*(x-2)^2)+exp(-(x+2)^2)+3*exp(-(x-5)^2)

  16. Numerical Result 6: D=40, u(0,x)= cos(pi*x/40)

  17. Observation of numerical results: different initial conditions • Solution tends to the same equilibrium solution for different initial conditions, which implies the equilibrium solution is asymptotically stable. • More experiments can be done to obtain more information on the equilibrium solutions for different D

  18. Numerical results in Menon, et al, Phys. Rev. E. Vol 71, 066201, 2005

  19. Mathematical Approach

  20. More solutions of u”+xu’+Du=0

  21. Stability of the zero equilibrium

  22. Bifurcation analysis

  23. Numerical bifurcation diagraminMenon’s paper

  24. Rigorous Mathematical Result(Shi and Zeng)

  25. Traveling wave solutions?

  26. Comparison with Fisher’s equation • In Fisher equation (without the convection term), no matter what D is, the solution will spread with a profile of a traveling wave in both directions, and the limit of the solution is u(x)=1 for all x • In this model (with the convection term), initially the solution spread with a profile of a traveling wave in both directions, but the prorogation is stalled after some time, and an equilibrium solution with a phase transition interface is the asymptotic limit.

  27. Numerical solution of Fisher equationD=40, u(0,x)=exp(-(x-2)^2)+exp(-(x+2)^2)

  28. Stages of a research problem • Derive the model from a physical phenomenon or a more complicated model • Numerical experiments • Observe mathematical results from the experiments • State and prove mathematical theorems

More Related