110 likes | 197 Vues
Explore the potential implementation of a Basic Income Grant (BIG) in Iran, discussing the economic, social, and political implications. Learn about the country's current system, challenges, and the proposed reform plan to shift from subsidies to direct cash transfers. Discover the prospects, benefits, and obstacles of implementing a BIG in Iran.
E N D
THE PROSPECTS OF A BASIC INCOME GRANT FOR IRAN Hamid Tabatabai BIEN 2010 – Sao Paulo – 1 July 2010
Purpose To discuss the following question and answer: • Q: Is Iran going to be BIEN’s utopia? Is this developing, Middle Eastern, Islamic state on the threshold of becoming the first country in the world to provide a basic income grant (BIG) to all its citizens? • A: Only time will tell, but the main ingredients are coming together one by one, almost by default and largely unnoticed.
Iran: Some Basic Information • Population: 72 million; two-thirds urban • Per capita income: US$3,500 • Significant inequality and poverty • Oil export revenues: $70 billion ($1,000 per capita) • Social protection system: Hybrid of public, semi-public and private programmes providing wide range of assistance to many but missing many too • Cash transfers: Exist under various guises • Of overwhelming importance: Price subsidies
Price Subsidies • Subsidised items: Fuel products, some food items, electricity and water • Gasoline: 10 US cents a litre; diesel just 2 cents; ... • Annual subsidy bill: $100 billion (mostly on energy) • Subsidy system as inefficient, costly, unfair • Wasteful consumption, pollution, smuggling to neighbouring countries, etc. • Rapidly rising bill • 70% going to richest 30% of the population
Reforming System of Subsidies • Centrepiece of Economic Reform Plan (June 2008) • Replacing price subsidies with direct cash transfers (CT) to people, econ. sectors, social security system • Gov’t rush to go ahead but two main concerns: • Gov’t dishing out billions in cash before elections • Fear of runaway inflation, social unrest • Gov’t submits bill to parliament, which puts it on hold for a year • Targeting Subsidies Law passed in January 2010
Coverage: Targeting that Wasn’t • Targeting “deciles”: Bottom 7? Only 2? ... Maybe 5 as compromise? Back to 7? But ... • Identifying targeted population: Application form asking about household (HH) demographics, education, income, car & house ownership, bank loans, etc.! • Response rate: 65% of HHs (end 2008), 85% (now) • HH (mis)classification proving monumental headache, causing widespread discontent • Targeting abandoned (for now!): Entitlement to cash transfers to be universal • But government plea to the well-off: Please abstain!
Transfer Amount • No official announcement yet but ballpark figures • Subsidy bill (x ½) / pop.: US$60/person/month • Initially, likely to be around $20-25/person/month • Same amount for all, possibly with extra for those in rural / deprived regions • Well below poverty line • At completion, approaching monthly minimum wage ($300) for a 5-member HH
Implementation Modalities • Single application per household still required (not clear what for?) • Transfers through bank account of head of household • Payment deposited every other month • Unconditional • Consideration of household income legally required, but finessed • Start: September 2010 • Duration: Five years
Prospects of a BIG for Iran (1) On the face of it excellent, almost there, … On the upside: • No new funding required • Affordability: 2-4% versus 30% GDP • Universal entitlement (with voluntary non-participation) • Equal transfer amount (possibly higher for more deprived) • Unconditional • Regular and in principle continuing
Prospects of a BIG for Iran (2) But difficulties lie ahead too … On the downside: • No recognition or acknowledgement of BIG • Payment to household head, not individual members • Long-term sustainability uncertain (oil prices, war, ...) • No impact evaluations planned • Politics of advocacy: Karrubi precedent; refugees • Limited relevance for other countries