1 / 13

 Select Z + 2 jet events  Make VBF like cuts

Fitting for a Z VBF signal Christian Gutschow , Kiran Joshi, Emily Nurse, Andy Pilkington SM EWK meeting, 10 th August 2012.  Select Z + 2 jet events  Make VBF like cuts  Fit to one discriminating variable for the number of signal and background events.

rey
Télécharger la présentation

 Select Z + 2 jet events  Make VBF like cuts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fitting for a Z VBF signalChristian Gutschow, Kiran Joshi, Emily Nurse, Andy PilkingtonSM EWK meeting, 10th August 2012  Select Z + 2 jet events  Make VBF like cuts  Fit to one discriminating variable for the number of signal and background events

  2. Datasets and cuts • 5.6 fb-1 of 8 TeVZμμ and Zee candidates • Background: Sherpa QCD Z + jets samples • Blah • Blah • Signal: Currently using 7 TeV Sherpa EWK samples • Z candidate • Two jets, pT1 > 45 GeV, pT2 > 35 GeV • Jet veto: No jets in between the two leading jets with pT > 25 GeV • ΔΦ(j,j) > π/2 • ΔΦ(Z,jj) > 2.9 • Fit the mjj distribution

  3. Fits to 8 TeV electron + muon Use signal template from 7 TeV Background Background+Signal Signal events: Input = 71 events (assuming 30% larger cross-section at 8 TeV) Fit for 79 +59 -55 We should have 3 times this dataset for HCP More events for W production

  4. 1000 MC toys with 3 times the data (16.8 fb-1) 213 input events ~2σ significance

  5. mjj background shape • Can we define control regions to test the Sherpa model of the background shape? • Z candidate Keep these cuts • Two jets, pT1 > 45 GeV, pT2 > 35 GeV • Jet veto: No jets in between the two leading jets Remove, relax or reverse • ΔΦ(j,j) > π/2 • ΔΦ(Z,jj) > 2.9 signal region

  6. mjj in control regions Remove all, reverse Φ(Z,jj) Remove all cuts In events where the Z and di-jet system do not balance: MC overestimates mjjtails • These events generally either: • have additional jets, or • the di-jet system comes from DPI or pileup

  7. Look at events with Φ(Z,jj) < 2.5 and mjj > 750 GeV

  8. mjj in control regions Remove all, reverse Φ(Z,jj) Remove all cuts No Z pT cut Z pT > 20 GeV

  9. mjj in control regions, with Z pT > 20 GeV Remove jet veto, relax Φ(Z,jj) > 2.7, reverse Φ(j,j) Signal region Remove Φ(j,j), relax Φ(Z,jj) > 2.7, require extra jet Relax Φ(Z,jj) > 2.7, require extra jet OR reverse Φ(j,j)

  10. Conclusion on control regions • Within the current limited stats the control regions are well described • We will have three (six) times the data and much more MC • We could use the W+jets events to check mjj in control regions

  11. JES systematic • Within the current limited stats the JES systematic is small • We will have much more MC • We could use the W+jets events to check the JES effect on mjj Make mjj background templates with JES scaled up one sigma Fit to a pol1

  12. JER systematic • Within the current limited stats the JER systematic is small • We will have much more MC • We could use the W+jets events to check the JER effect on mjj Make mjj background templates with JER scaled up one sigma Fit to a pol1

  13. How systematics effect mjj fits 1 – (0.1/3000)×mjj 1 – (0.2/3000)×mjj 1 – (0.3/3000)×mjj • So far not much sign of systematic shift within stats • Try weighting background mjj spectrum by a 1st order polynomial • Do 1000 toy MC fits to shifted template 213 input events 213 input events 213 input events ± ~60 events ± ~90 events ± ~140 events Recall statistical uncertainty ~100 events ~2σ significance

More Related