1 / 42

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS. K.H. Rosen, Discrete Maths and its applications, McGraw-Hill. Course covers introduction to set theory, functions, relations, logic, graphical representation. Functions.

rhoda
Télécharger la présentation

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DISCRETE MATHEMATICS • K.H. Rosen, Discrete Maths and its applications, McGraw-Hill. • Course covers introduction to set theory, functions, relations, logic, graphical representation.

  2. Functions • Df A function is a rule which assigns to each member a of a set A a unique member b of set B. We write f: A→B. Alternatively we write f(a)=b. So far have been concerned with the case when A=B=R (the set of real numbers) • Note for each element a of A an element b exists in B but not vice-versa.

  3. Functions as relations • Recall relation is a subset of AxB • A function is a special case of relation R where (a,b) in R implies there is no (a,b’) in R unless b , b’ coincide and where there is (a,b) in R for any a in A. • Thus for a function F the following statements are equivalent • F(a)=b, aFb, (a,b)∈F.

  4. Domain and Codomain of f: A→B • A is the domain, B is the codomain of f • Example let f be the function that rounds up a number to the nearest integer. Hence round(.1)=0, round (3.6)=4. So round R→Z. • Hence domain is the set of real numbers whilst the codomain is the set of integers.

  5. Image, pre-image and Range • If f(a)=b we say b is the image of a under f. Likewise we refer to a as the pre-image of b. We also talk about the images and pre-images of subsets of A and B. For example if S is a subset of A the image of S is f(S)={f(s) | s∈S}. The range of a function is the set f(A). • Ex suppose f: R→R,f(x)=x², then image of 2 is 4, pre-image of 9 is 3, Range of f is {x∈R,|x>0}.

  6. Injective,surjective,bijective • A function is injective if f(x)=f(y) implies x=y. ( one to one mapping) Examples f(x)=x+1, f(x)=x² both defined on R are injective, not injective. But if we define only on positive real numbers both are injective. • A function is surjective if for every element b of B there exists a in A with f(a)=b. ( mapping is onto)

  7. Example • f:R→R f(x)=x+1 is surjective f(x)=x² is not surjective since no x exists with f(x)=-1. But if we define on C the set of complex numbers both are surjective. • Definition If f is surjective and injective we say it is bijective ( one to one and onto)

  8. Exercise • Consider two finite sets A and B. Evaluate: • a) The number of functions from A to B. • b) The number of injections from A to B. • c) The number of bijections from A to B.

  9. Exercise- find examples of functions from N to N satisfying: • a) An injection but not surjection • b) A surjection but not injection • c) A bijection • d) neither a surjection or injection

  10. Inverse of a function • Df The function f⁻¹:B→A is the inverse of f : A →B and has the property that f(f⁻¹(x))=x,:x∈A • Theorem The function f has an inverse iff f⁻¹ is bijective. To prove this think of f⁻¹ as the relation ⋃{(b,a))},with (a,b)∈f ⊆B×A • Since f injective there is no more than one element of A for each element of B and since f surjective there is no less than one element of A for each element of B so f⁻¹ is a function

  11. Inverse • Now show if f has an inverse it must be bijective • If f(a)=f(b)it follows that f⁻¹(f(a))=f⁻¹(f(b) so by definition of inverse we have a=b so that f is injective • For any b in B a=f⁻¹(b) and then f(a)=f(f⁻¹(b))=b so there is an element a in A for every b in B with f(a)=b, so f is surjective. Since f injective and surjective it is also bijective

  12. INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC • What do we mean by logic? • Oxford Dict. The systematic use of symbolic techniques and mathematical techniques to determine the forms of valid deductive argument. • Thus logic is the common language by which we can demonstrate the validity of our reasoning …’

  13. PROPOSITIONS AND NEGATIONS • Proposition is a declarative statement that is true or false, but not both. • Ex All Maths undergraduates wear sandals. False • All Maths undergraduates have tutors. True • If a relation is transitive then Rⁿ is transitive. True • Hopefully the Circle Line will be running tonight. Not a proposition. • Propositional logic is the branch of logic dealing with reasoning about propositions. • We will use symbols to denote propositions. Ex let p be the proposition all Maths students wear glasses. Let p be the proposition that all EE1 students know how to wire a plug. False.

  14. NEGATION AND USE OF PROPOSITIONS • Use several propositions to build compound propositions • Df Let p be a proposition. Then the proposition ‘ It is not the case that p’ is another proposition called the negation of p and written as ¬p. Ex This lecture course is given at Imperial College. Its negation is ‘ It is not the case that this lecture course is given at Imperial College.’ OR ‘this lecture course is not given at Imperial College.

  15. Conjuncton and Disjunction • Given propositions p and q the proposition ‘p and q’ written p∧q is true when both p and q are true and false otherwise, it is called the conjunction of p and q. • Given propositions p and q then the proposition ‘p or q’ denoted by p∨q is the proposition that is false when both p and q are false and true otherwise. p∨q is called the disjunction of p and q. • Ex Suppose p is ‘Maths undergraduates love tofu’ and q is ‘Maths undergraduates are weird’ • Then p∨q is ‘ Maths undergrads either love tofu or are weird or both’. • p∧q is ‘maths undergrads like tofu and are weird’.

  16. IMPLICATIONS • When we say p implies q, written p→q, we mean the proposition which is false when p is true and q is false, and true otherwise. ( think …) • When p→q we might say ‘ if p, then q’, ‘ p is sufficient for q’, ‘q if p’, ‘q is necessary for p’, ‘p only if q’ • Example Suppose p is ‘I revised’ and q is ‘I passed the exam’ Then p→q may be expresed as ‘if I revised I passed’ ‘I passed if I revised’ or ‘I revised only if I passed’

  17. Implications • There is no need for a relationship between the premise and conclusion. Example ‘If all Maths undergrads like tofu, then 1+1=2. True regardless of tofu. • ‘If all Maths undergrads like tofu then 1+2=4’ True because not all undergrads like tofu. • ‘If we are in london 1+2=4’ False because we are in London but 1+2 is 3. • ‘If all Maths undergrads like tofu then 1+2=4’ True since not all maths students like tofu. • Note that in English ‘implies’ can also mean causes so English considers the meaning of propositions whilst Logic considers whether they are true or false..

  18. CONVERSE, CONTRAPOSITIV, AND INVERSE • a iff b is the same as (a→b)∧(b→a) and is written as a⇔b. Hence a⇔b is true when a and b are both true or when a and b are both false (and is otherwise false) • We define b→a to be the converse of a→b. • The contrapositive of a proposition a→b is the proposition ¬b→¬a. • The inverse of a→b is the proposition ¬a→¬b.

  19. LOGICAL EQUIVALENCE • A tautology is a compound proposition that is always true, eg p∨¬p is a tautology. • A contradiction is a compound proposition that is always false. Eg p∧¬p is a contradiction. • We say propositions p and q are logically equivalent, written as if p≡q, if p⇔q is a tautology. Eg ¬(p∨q)≡¬p∧¬q.. De Morgans Theorem • We can express an implication in terms of a disjunction and a negation p→q≡¬p∨q

  20. LOGIVAL EQUIVALENCE • Hence an implication is logically equivalent to its contrapositive • p→q≡¬p∨q≡q∨¬p≡¬q→¬p • If I revised, I passed ≡ if I didn’t pass I didn’t revise. • Likewise its converse is logically equivalent to its inverse. • q→p≡¬q∨p≡p∨¬q≡¬p→¬q

  21. LOGICAL EQUIVALENCE • The most common mistake in logic is to assume an implication is logically equivalent to its inverse • Examples: ‘if I revised I passed’ is not equivalent to ‘ if I didn’t revise I didn’t pass’ • ‘if I eat too much I will get fat’ is not equivalent to ‘if I don’t eat too much I will not get fat’

  22. OPERATOR PRECEDENCE • BASIC RULES • a∧¬b≡a∧(¬b) • a∨b∧c≡a∨(b∧c) • a∨b→c≡(a∨b)→c • Hence order of increasing precedence is →∨∧¬

  23. LOGIC AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE • Language often ambiguous so try and identify the basic propositions and build into logical statements. • I sell donuts and coffee ≡ ‘I sell coffee’ ^I sell donuts’ • I am not good at golf≡¬(I am good at golf) • If its raining its not sunny≡raining→¬sunny • You can have chicken or fish ≡’you can have chicken’ ∧’you can have fish’ • Unless causes problems!!! I will play golf if it doesn’t rain can be ¬(′it will rain')→'I will play golf‘ • or ¬(′it will rain')⇔′I will play golf‘

  24. PREDICATE LOGIC • Propositional logic is limited, eg how do we express ‘All Maths undergrads are clever’ in terms of the cleverness of particular maths undergrads? Or express ‘there is a maths undergrad wearing sandals’ in terms of whether each individual maths undergrad is wearing sandals • We therefore generalize the idea of a proposition to a predicate, predicates take one or more variable as arguments

  25. PREDICATE LOGIC • Examples: Let P(x) be the statement “x>12” then P(1) is false, P(23) is true. • Let P(x) denote the statement ‘x is a Professor in the Mathematics Department’ then P(Hall) is true but P(Limebeer) is false • Thus P(x) is not true or false until we specify an argument

  26. UNIVERSAL QUANTIFIERS • Suppose P(x) is the predicate ‘has a heart’ • Then we can discuss P(Hall), P(Limebeer) but how can we say all humans have a heart. Predicates deal with this using quantification. • Definition The universal quantification of P(x) is the proposition ‘P(x) is true for all values of x in the universe of discourse’ Hence in the universe of discourse consisting of all humans we would say the universal quantification of P(x) is true • Notation We write ∀xP(x) which we read as for all x, P(x) for the universal quantification of P(x)

  27. UNIVERSAL QUANTIFICATION • Of course we also need to specify the universe of discourse but here can use set theory • Suppose P(x) is the predicate x²≽0, then we can say ∀x∈R P(x), ie for all real x P(x) • but ¬(∀x∈C P(x))

  28. EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIER • Suppose P(x) is’ x is wearing a necklace’ then P(Florence) is the proposition ‘Florence is wearing a necklace’ but how do we say ‘there is an EE1 Student wearing a necklace’? • Definition The existential quantification of P(x) is the proposition ‘there exists an element x in the universe of discourse such that P(x) is true’ • Notation we write ∃xP(x) which we read as there exist x such that P(x). Hence if J=set of all EE! Students we can write ∃x∈JP(x)

More Related