1 / 21

Erin Tucker (SIUC) Logan Park, Ph.D. (SIUC) Ryan Sharp Ph.D. (NPS) Ken Chilman, Ph.D. (SIUC)

Park Planning and Social Science Informing General Management Plans: An Ozark National Scenic Riverways Case Study. Erin Tucker (SIUC) Logan Park, Ph.D. (SIUC) Ryan Sharp Ph.D. (NPS) Ken Chilman, Ph.D. (SIUC) George Wright Society 2011. Photo from commons.wikipedia.org. Planning.

rhona
Télécharger la présentation

Erin Tucker (SIUC) Logan Park, Ph.D. (SIUC) Ryan Sharp Ph.D. (NPS) Ken Chilman, Ph.D. (SIUC)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Park Planning and Social Science Informing General Management Plans:An Ozark National Scenic Riverways Case Study Erin Tucker (SIUC) Logan Park, Ph.D. (SIUC) Ryan Sharp Ph.D. (NPS) Ken Chilman, Ph.D. (SIUC) George Wright Society 2011 Photo from commons.wikipedia.org

  2. Planning • General Management Plan • History • RVIMS • RAVI

  3. Ozark National Scenic Riverways • Ozark Highlands of SE Missouri • 134 miles of river • 1.4 million visitors/year • Boating, canoeing, swimming, fishing, tubing, hiking, horseback riding, and camping

  4. Research Questions • What are river use levels currently? • What is the range of conditions available on the river with respect to crowding and conflict?

  5. Study Methods • Visitor Use Levels • Sampling approach • Data collection • Questionnaire • Sampling approach • 532 visitors surveyed; 93% response rate

  6. Study Results: Visitor Use Levels

  7. Study Results: Questionnaire

  8. Trip Characteristics Boaters • Ave. trip length= 5.1 hours • Local Floaters • Multiple days • Mid-western

  9. Discussion and Conclusions

  10. Monitoring • Frequent, affordable, effective • Best monitoring plan is one you can actually conduct!

  11. Social Impacts • Crowding • Conflict

  12. Acknowledgements • Joel Ramtahal (SIUC) • Ross Smith, Jacob Nordmann, Sean Patrick (SIUC) • Dr. James Price, Russ Runge, and all of the ONSR NPS staff • Keri Cahill (NPS, Denver Service Center)

More Related