1 / 10

Minnesota’s Lighthouse High Schools

Minnesota’s Lighthouse High Schools. Connecting Action and Research. Building the Foundation:. Data retreats. Building the Foundation:. Data retreats. Taskforce. Building the Foundation:. Data Retreats. Taskforce. Breaking Ranks. Foundational Pieces:. Data Retreats. Taskforce.

rhurd
Télécharger la présentation

Minnesota’s Lighthouse High Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Minnesota’s Lighthouse High Schools Connecting Action and Research

  2. Building the Foundation: Data retreats

  3. Building the Foundation: Data retreats Taskforce

  4. Building the Foundation: Data Retreats Taskforce Breaking Ranks

  5. Foundational Pieces: Data Retreats Taskforce Breaking Ranks Newmann Framework

  6. A Unifying Framework for School Improvement Based on the research of Fred Newmann The key is to integrate cultural and structural conditions to focus on intellectual quality and professional community in a sustained way. • Cultural Conditions • Primary concern for the intellectual quality of student learning • Commitment to high expectations for all students, regardless of individual differences • Support for innovation, debate, inquiry, & seeking new professional knowledge • Ethos of caring, sharing, & mutual help among staff, & between staff & students, based on respect, trust, & shared power relations among staff • Strong, mutually influential relationship between the school & the parents & community (Fullan). • School Capacity • Teachers’ Individual • Knowledge, Skills • & Dispositions • Professional Community • Program Coherence • Technical Resources • Principal Leadership • Professional development is more • likely to enhance capacity when it • addresses several aspects of • capacity instead of focusing only • on teachers’ knowledge, skills • & dispositions. Instructional Quality Instruction & Assessment Student Achievement • School Structures • Policies & Programs (e.g., homework policy, prof. development program, length of school day & class periods, etc.) that provide— • Sustained time for instruction, planning, staff development, & student advising • Interdependent work structures for staff, esp. teaching teams & committees for schoolwide decision making • School autonomy from regulatory constraints • Small size for school & instructional units • State & district level policies and programs also affect school level structures (Fullan). • Teachers’ Individual Knowledge, Skills & Dispositions • Staff are competent in instruction & assessment which is centered on curriculum appropriate for their particular students • Staff hold high expectations for all students’ learning • Professional Community • Clear shared goals for student learning • Collective & collaborative responsibility among staff • Reflective professional inquiry among staff • Opportunities for staff to influence school’s activities & policies Program Coherence Programs for student & staff learning are coordinated, focused on clear learning goals, & sustained over a period of time. Technical Resources High quality standards & assessments, curriculum, books & other instructional materials, lab equipment, computers, adequate workspace, remodeled physical facilities, etc. • Principal Leadership • Principal is very influential in life of the school & is a critical force in the school’s capacity. • Principal has primary legal authority to positively affect each aspect of school capacity. • Sources • Fullan, M., Rolheiser, C., Mascall, B. & K. Edge (2001). Accomplishing large-scale reform: A tri-level proposition. Retrieved from http://sustainability2002.terc.edu/invoke.cfm/page/70/show/print. • Newmann, F. et al (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans. • Newmann, F. & Associates (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. B. Aune, MDE 6/16/05

  7. Broad Goals: • Build SEA capacity to facilitate high school redesign • Support systemic high school redesign through action research

  8. Finding the Schools: • Site leadership team • Data collection and analysis • School improvement plan development and refinement • Evaluation of grant activities • Public reporting of results

  9. Building SEA Capacity • Facilitators partnered with school teams • Periodic training and work sessions • Site visits and team retreats

  10. Working with Data: • From reporting outcomes to documenting implementation • From sharing practice to sharing knowledge

More Related