1 / 16

Cognitive Impairment in the Terminally Ill

Cognitive Impairment in the Terminally Ill. David Nowels, MD, MPH; Caroline Bublitz, MS; Cordt Kassner, MA; Jean Kutner, MD, MSPH; and the PoPCRN Working Group. Background. Confusion is common among the ill 20% or more of hospitalized patients are acutely confused

Télécharger la présentation

Cognitive Impairment in the Terminally Ill

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cognitive Impairment in the Terminally Ill David Nowels, MD, MPH; Caroline Bublitz, MS; Cordt Kassner, MA; Jean Kutner, MD, MSPH; and the PoPCRN Working Group

  2. Background • Confusion is common among the ill • 20% or more of hospitalized patients are acutely confused • Confusion is usually a manifestation of • dementia • delirium (acute confusion syndrome) • depression

  3. fall risk skin problems sleep disturbance incontinence shortened life-span, even for those with advanced cancer behavioral issues for caregivers complicated bereavement Background - confusion is associated with

  4. Background - • Confusion is potentially reversible • If a component of a reversible symptom complex (e.g. delirium) • has been shown in delirious terminally ill cancer patients • studies in hospitalized patients show potential for prevention

  5. Background - • Confusion prevalence in the terminally ill is unknown • delirium in 15-85% of advanced cancer or AIDS patients • prevalence unknown for other illness • delirium inversely correlated with functional status in cancer patients • delirium and confusion often not identified

  6. Study - confusion prevalence in hospice patients • Study goals • to describe confusion prevalence among hospice patients • to describe confusion severity among hospice patients • to identify associations between confusion and other variables • to estimate prevalence of delirium

  7. Study - confusion prevalence in hospice patients • Study Methods • cross-sectional study in 19 hospices • hospices participants in the Population-based Palliative Care Research Network (PoPCRN) • one survey of 10 questions per patient • nurses completed questionnaires about their patients during interdisciplinary team meetings • study conducted over 6 weeks

  8. Study setting - • The Population-based Palliative Care Research Network is committed to improving care for persons at the end of life by conducting rigorous, high-quality end-of-life research in settings where palliative care is provided • 42 organizations participated in studies • 8 studies since inception, 2 formally funded • http://www.uchsc.edu/popcrn • seed funding from UCHSC through Hartford grant

  9. Results -patient characteristics, n = 299

  10. Confusion - prevalence Confusion associated with: • advancing age - acts as confounder • care in nursing home • diagnoses • cancer 41% • ftt 77% • neuro 78% • dementia 97% Overall 50% 17% overall were rated as having severe or disabling confusion

  11. Confusion -frequent manifestations, n= 145

  12. Confusion - a problem for someone, n=133 Especially if patient shows: • inappropriate mood 97% • agitation 90% • altered sleep/wake 84% Demographic and diagnostic categories are not significant. Confusion causes problems 79% of the time.

  13. Delirium • Criteria used to identify subset of delirious • confused • impaired attention • altered cognition • rapid onset (hours to days) • Number identified = 21 (7%)

  14. Proposal • Prospective study in hospice population • determine incidence of confusion over time and functional status • identify associated clinical syndrome • identify symptoms • identify potential etiologies • describe usual management • describe impact on patient well-being • describe impact on grief

  15. Proposal • Following prospective study - develop an intervention program to reduce impact of confusion on patient and loved-ones

  16. Association with Coleman Institute • Contact with others collecting data from population of impaired individuals • Exposure to innovations aimed at improving well-being that might be useful to the terminally ill • example - confused patients fall more commonly and anecdotally, beds closer to the ground prevent associated injuries

More Related