1 / 42

Fine Guidance Sensor 2010 HST Calibration Work Shop Ed Nelan Barbara McArthur STScI

Fine Guidance Sensor 2010 HST Calibration Work Shop Ed Nelan Barbara McArthur STScI. Fine Guidance Sensor 2010 HST Calibration Work Shop Ed Nelan Barbara McArthur STScI. Linda Reed, Art Bradley , Mike Wenz , Ed Kimmer, Matt Lallo , Merle Reinhart,

ringo
Télécharger la présentation

Fine Guidance Sensor 2010 HST Calibration Work Shop Ed Nelan Barbara McArthur STScI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fine Guidance Sensor 2010 HST Calibration Work Shop Ed Nelan Barbara McArthur STScI

  2. Fine Guidance Sensor 2010 HST Calibration Work Shop Ed Nelan Barbara McArthur STScI Linda Reed, Art Bradley, Mike Wenz, Ed Kimmer, Matt Lallo, Merle Reinhart, & The Guide Star Acquisition Working Group

  3. guide stars UDF Field

  4. Hubble Ultra Deep Field 412 orbits

  5. 20 years of HST Focal Plane

  6. FGS2r2: • FGS2r was replaced due to failing LEDs on its star selector servos, which put guide star acquisitions at risk. • We now have: • FGS3 (original) • FGS2r2 (new) • FGS1r (1997)

  7. SM4: commissioning & calibrating FGS2r2 • On orbit commissioning of FGS2r2 began ~ 2 weeks after HST was released from Atlantis • AMA adjustment • FGS-FGS2r2 alignment • Photometric sensitivity • Long term monitoring of FGS2r2 has been carried out since May 2009. • geometric distortion • alignment in HST focal plane • interferometric response. • Future calibrations being contemplated.

  8. AMA adjustment: aligning the FGS Koesters Prism with the optical axis of HST: “before” “after”

  9. Alignment of FGS2r2 w.r.t. FGS1r & FGS3 fgs2r2 fgs3 fgs1r

  10. FGS2r2 CommissioningMay – June 2009 • Interferometer optical alignment (AMA) • FGS2r2 scale calibration • FGS-FGS2r2 focal plane alignment • Photometric sensitivity • FGS2r2 geometric distortion calibration • Deferred until instrument stablizes on orbit • FGS2r2 is routinely used for guiding HST

  11. FGS2r2: monitoring interference fringes • FGS2r2 shows little interferometric evolution during first year in orbit. • Due to being in a nitrogen purge from 2002 until 2009? • Additional adjustment of AMA apparently not needed. • Can proceed with 5-orbit geometric distortion calibration.

  12. FGS1r: Science The Space Telescope Astrometry Team, 10/1996.

  13. April, 1990 Space Shuttle Discovery, STS-31 KSC

  14. HST Timeline, 09/2008 – 03/2010 • Sept 15/08: NSSC-I FSW upgrade to support SM4 (WFC3 & COS)

  15. HST Timeline, 09/2008 – 03/ 2010 • Sept 15/08: NSSC-I FSW upgrade to support SM4 (WFC3 & COS) • Sept 15/08: JSC closed for the week due to Hurricane Ike. • Rumors warn that SM4 may slip due to Ike

  16. HST Timeline, 09/2008 – 03/ 2010 • Sept 15/08: NSSC-I FSW upgrade to support SM4 (WFC3 & COS) • Sept 15/08: JSC closed for the week due to Hurricane Ike. • Rumors warn that SM4 may slip due to Ike • Sept 24/08: NASA announces SM4 launch is Oct 14

  17. HST Timeline, 09/2008 – 03/ 2010 • Sept 15/08: NSSC-I FSW upgrade to support SM4 (WFC3 & COS) • Sept 15/08: JSC closed for the week due to Hurricane Ike. • Rumors warn that SM4 may slip due to Ike • Sept 24/08: NASA announces SM4 launch is Oct 14 • Sept 28/08: HST safes, CU/SDF side-A fails, FGS1r is only HST science instrument operating.

  18. HST Timeline, 09/2008 – 03/ 2010 • Sept 15/08: NSSC-I FSW upgrade to support SM4 (WFC3 & COS) • Sept 15/08: JSC closed for the week due to Hurricane Ike. • Rumors warn that SM4 may slip due to Ike • Sept 24/08: NASA announces SM4 launch is Oct 14 • Sept 28/08: HST safes, CU/SDF side-A fails, FGS1r is only HST science instrument operating. • Sept 30/08: NASA postpones SM4.

  19. HST Timeline, 09/2008 – 03/ 2010 • Sept 15/08: NSSC-I FSW upgrade to support SM4 (WFC3 & COS) • Sept 15/08: JSC closed for the week due to Hurricane Ike. • Rumors warn that SM4 may slip due to Ike • Sept 24/08: NASA announces SM4 launch is Oct 14 • Sept 28/08: HST safes, CU/SDF side-A fails, FGS1r is only HST science instrument operating. • Sept 30/08: NASA postpones SM4. • Oct 15/08: NSSC-I switch to side-B

  20. HST Timeline, 09/2008 – 03/ 2010 • Sept 15/08: NSSC-I FSW upgrade to support SM4 (WFC3 & COS) • Sept 15/08: JSC closed for the week due to Hurricane Ike. • Rumors warn that SM4 may slip due to Ike • Sept 24/08: NASA announces SM4 launch is Oct 14 • Sept 28/08: HST safes, CU/SDF side-A fails, FGS1r is only HST science instrument operating. • Sept 30/08: NASA postpones SM4. • Oct 15/08: NSSC-I switch to side-B • Oct 16/08: side-B fails • returns to operate Oct 29 • FGS1r, WFPC2, ACS/SBC only operating instruments until SM4

  21. FGS Timeline 09/2008 – 03/2010 • Oct 23/08: Gilliland et al.allocated175 FGS orbits to collect one trillion photons from HD 17156. • Transit events: Nov 6 & 7, Dec 19 • Asteroseismology: Dec 21- Jan 2 (ten-day campaign) • Nov 25/08: Request to re-optimize FGS1r S-curves via AMA submitted to HSTMO and GSFC HST Project. • Approved week of 12/01, executed successfully Jan 23,2009 • Nov 30/08: Phase 2 Proposal “Calibrating FGS1r OFAD, Second Epoch” submitted. 18 orbits. • Needed to execute before December 23 (M35 unavailable afterward), and before FGS1r AMA re-optimization • Executed successfully, Dec 12 – 20, 2008 • Previous FGS1r OFAD was Dec 2000.

  22. FGS1r S-curves: significant evolution during 1rst 8 yrs on orbit

  23. FGS1r S-curves: then, stability, no further changes

  24. FGS1r S-curves: post AMA adjustment

  25. AMA move impact on FGS1r OFAD Moving FGS1r AMA shifts pickle in HST focal plane (~5”). Four orbits of FGS1r astrometry were acquired after the AMA move to re-calibrate FGS1r-FGS alignment. The relative positions of 16 stars were measured in each orbit. To measure change in distortion, an identical set of data were acquired prior to the AMA move.

  26. AMA move impact on FGS1r OFAD Bluesymbols show residuals in fit of star position using two “before” orbits. Red symbols show residuals in fit of star positions using two “after” orbits. residuals ~1.3 mas

  27. AMA move impact on FGS1r OFAD Bluesymbols show residuals of star positions “before” AMA move relative to the the stars position measured “after”the AMA move (Blue) residuals ~4 mas

  28. AMA move impact on FGS1r OFAD The difference in the star positions before and after AMA move suggests that the mirror move introduced a radial term in the distortion.

  29. FGS1r 6-orbit “mini-OFAD” executed March 2010 Stars from the 1mas “OFAD catalog” in M35 were observed.

  30. FGS1r OFAD updated using 03/2010 observations: residuals in measured star positions from observations across the AMA move, using the March 2010 OFAD update. residuals ~ 3 mas

  31. updated OFAD + radial term fit to all 8 (4 before + 4 after) plates residuals in measured star positions from observations across the AMA move, using the March 2010 OFAD update w/radial term in solution. residuals ~ 2 mas (we want 1.6 mas)

  32. Need for a radial term may indicate that 2010 OFAD was not quite adequate (TBD)--- may need supplemental visits in December The “real” way to do OFAD (Dec 2000)

  33. WD 1818+126, the faintest FGS binary Single scan V = 16.1 system pmtxa = 11.3 pmtxb = 8.8 pmtya = 10.1 pmtyb = 13.8 pmtxa_dark = 3.6 pmtxb_dark = 1.6 pmtya_dark = 3.7 pmtyb_dark = 5.9

  34. WD 1818+126, the faintest FGS binary twenty scans averaged V = 16.1 system

  35. WD 1818+126, the faintest FGS binary twenty scans averaged, smoothed, and fit to a model V = 16.1 system dM = 0.9 Mp= 16.5 Ms = 17.4

  36. WD 1818+126, the faintest FGS binary WD 1818+126 orbit being mapped by FGS1r.

  37. HST has three healthy Fine Guidance Sensors that will serve until the end of the mission.

  38. JWST FGS NIR Camera J < 18.5 see poster by Holfeltz et al. A B NIRCam Observation of the HST UDF. l = 223.55 b = -54.451

More Related