1 / 34

Enhancing Brand Equity and Accountability

Enhancing Brand Equity and Accountability. Chapter Objectives. After reading this chapter you should be able to: Explain the concept of brand equity from both the company’s and the customer’s perspectives. What are some of the positive outcomes that result from enhancing brand equity?

riva
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Brand Equity and Accountability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Enhancing Brand Equity and Accountability

  2. Chapter Objectives After reading this chapter you should be able to: • Explain the concept of brand equity from both the company’s and the customer’s perspectives. • What are some of the positive outcomes that result from enhancing brand equity? • Describe the different models of brand equity from the customer’s perspective. • Understand how marcom efforts must influence behavior and achieve financial accountability.

  3. Are There Too Many Social Media Brands?

  4. Which Brand Is “Best”? (Measures are important!) 1. Harris Interactive Poll (2400 adults) • “Which three brands do you consider to be the best?” • [2007 – Coca-Cola, Sony, Toyota] 2. Harris Interactive Brand Equity (EquiTrend) Study(25,000 adults) • Familiarity, quality, purchase considerations, brand expectations, distinctiveness, trust • [2008 – Heinz, M&Ms, Hershey’s; 2010 – Target, Nintendo, M&Ms] 3. Interbrand’s “Best Global Brands” • Brand sales as a % of total company sales • Earnings (profits) for a brand • NPV of the brand earnings, discounted by interest rates, risk, market leadership, stability and global reach • [2007 – Coca-Cola, Microsoft, IBM; 2010 – IMB #2] 4. Young & Rubicam’s Brand Asset Valuator (200,000 adults) • Brand strength: differentiation, relevance • Brand stature: esteem, knowledge

  5. Brand Defined Brand A name, term, sign, symbol, or design, or a combination of them intended to identify the goods and services of one seller or group of sellers and to differentiate them from those of the competition.

  6. Definition of Brand Equity Brand Equity the goodwill (equity) that an established brand has built up over its existence.

  7. As Brand Equity Increases… • A higher market share is achieved • Brand loyalty increases • Premium prices can be charged • The brand earns a revenue premium

  8. Revenue Premium • The revenue differential between a branded item and a corresponding private-labeled item.

  9. Children’s Taste Preferences

  10. Young & Rubicam’s “Brand Asset Valuator” and Creating Strong Brands • Methodology: • Interviews with over 200,000 consumers • 40 countries • 19,000 brands • 40 measurement scales • “DREK” sequence (measures of brand equity): • differentiation -> relevance -> esteem -> knowledge • Power Grid: • brand strength (differentiation, relevance) • brand stature (esteem, knowledge) • Brand Development Cycle

  11. Figure 2.1: Power Grid and Brand Development Cycle

  12. Figure: 2.2: A Customer-Based Perspective on Brand Equity

  13. Figure 2.3: Brands and Their Management

  14. The Brand Concept and Brand Concept Management • Brand concept: the specific meaning that brand managers create and communicate to the target market. • this is accomplished by appeals to functional, symbolic, and experiential needs • Brand concept management: the analysis, planning, implementation, and control of a brand concept throughout the life of a brand.

  15. How Brand Concepts Can Be Developed • Functional needs (solving problems): products that attempt to fulfill the consumer’s consumption-related problems • Symbolic needs (associating the brand with symbolic objects): directed at consumers’ desire for self-enhancement, role position, group membership, and belongingness • Experiential needs (sensory pleasures, personal experience): products that provide sensory pleasure, variety, and/or cognitive stimulation.

  16. Dimensions of Brand Personalities • Sincerity (e.g., Disney) • Excitement (e.g., Hummer) • Competence (e.g., Toyota) • Sophistication (e.g., Rolex, Cartier) • Ruggedness (e.g., Timberland boots)

  17. Illustration of a Sincere Brand--Disney

  18. Illustration of a Sophisticated Brand

  19. Illustration of a Rugged Brand

  20. Three General Ways Brand Equity is Enhanced • Allow brand to speak-for-itself • Create message-driven associations • Leveraging current meanings or associations

  21. Figure 2.5: Leveraging Brand Meaning from Various Sources

  22. Co-branding and Ingredient Branding • Co-branding • A partnership between two brands • Ingredient branding • Inclusion of one brand within the other

  23. What Benefits Result from Enhancing Brand Equity? • Increased consumer loyalty • Long-term growth and profitability for the brand • Maintain brand differentiation from competitive offerings • Insulate brand from price competition 23

  24. Evaluating World-Class Brands Quality Salience Equity Measuring World-Class Brands

  25. Measuring World-Class Brands • Quality: score ranging from 0 to 10 (unacceptable/ poor to outstanding/ extraordinary) • Salience: score ranging from 0 to 100 (percentage of people who feel sufficiently well informed about a brand to rate it) • Equity: score ranging from 0 to 100 (determined by multiplying the quality and salience scores and dividing the product by 10)

  26. Equitrend’s Top-Ten World-Class Brands Overall (2009)

  27. Interbrand’sTop 20 Global Brands (2010)

  28. Affecting Behavior and Achieving Marcom Accountability • Creating brand awareness and boosting brand image serve little positive effect unless individuals make purchases or engage in some other form of desired behavior.

  29. ROMI • The effect of marcom, or of its specific elements such as advertising, can be gauged in terms of whether it generates a reasonable revenue return on the marcom investment. • In marketing, return on investment is called return on marketing investment (ROMI) • (In accounting, ROI = net income/avg. O.E.)

  30. Difficulty of Measuring Marcom Effectiveness • Choosing a Metric • Gaining Agreement • Collecting Accurate Data • Calibrating Special Effects

  31. Choosing a Metric • Change in brand awareness • Improved consumer attitude toward the brand • Increased purchase intentions • Larger sales volume (e.g., via scanner data; marketing mix models)

  32. Gaining Agreement

  33. Collecting Accurate Data and Calibrating Special Effects • What exact sales figures should be used to calculate sales? • How much relative effect does each program element have on sales volume compared to the effect of other elements?

  34. Marketing-Mix Modeling – Example

More Related