1 / 27

D + K - p + p + :reconstruction and perspectives for the measurement of the elliptic flow

D + K - p + p + :reconstruction and perspectives for the measurement of the elliptic flow. Elena Bruna University of Torino. Terzo Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di Alice, 12-14 Nov 2007. Outline. Exclusive reconstruction of D + → K - p + p + in Pb-Pb and pp collisions:

river
Télécharger la présentation

D + K - p + p + :reconstruction and perspectives for the measurement of the elliptic flow

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. D+K-p+p+:reconstruction and perspectives for the measurement of the elliptic flow Elena Bruna University of Torino Terzo Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di Alice, 12-14 Nov 2007

  2. Outline • Exclusive reconstruction of D+ → K-p+p+in Pb-Pb and pp collisions: • Selection strategy • Results • pp: Results with more statistics w.r.t. previous analysis • pp: A look at the systematic errors due to the selection procedure • cut variables considered: distance primary-secondary vertices, cosqpoint • Perspectives for the measurement of D+ azimuthal distribution in Pb-Pb Elena Bruna

  3. primary vertex K p d Working point: d>700 mm d cut (mm) d (mm) Selection strategy (1/4) • Cuts on single tracks ( pT, d0rf ) • In Pb-Pb reduce the combinatorial background from 109 to 106 triplets per event keeping ≈7% of the signal • pT cut different for K and p (identified by the charge sign: D+K-p+p+) • Cuts on Kp candidate pairs • K and p have opposite charge sign • Cut on the distance d between the vertex of the 2 tracks and the primary vertex Elena Bruna

  4. Selection strategy (2/4) • Cuts on Kpp candidate triplets of tracks • selection based on the products of impact parameters of the two Kp pairs  25% of BKG triplets rejected, ≈ all signal kept • Cuts on the secondary vertex quality: BLACK: signal (Kpp from D+) RED: BKG (Kpp combinatorics) BLACK: signal (Kpp from D+) RED: BKG (Kpp combinatorics) σ (cm) Elena Bruna

  5. Selection strategy (3/4) • Four selection variables: • Distance between primary and secondary vertex (dPS) • cosqpoint • Sum of squared impact parameters s = d012+d022+d032 • Max. pT among the 3 tracks pM=Max{pT1,pT2,pT3} BKG cosqpoint SIG Elena Bruna d PS(mm)

  6. Selection strategy (4/4) • n-dimensional matrix procedure (n=4), i.e. one dimension for each cut variable (dPS, pM, cosqpoint, s): • Fill matrices Sijkl (signal) and Bijkl (background) • Each cell ijkl contains the number of triplets passing the set of cuts: [dPS > cuti AND pM > cutjANDcosqpoint >cutk AND s > cutl] cosqpointCUT Significance S/(S+B) for 2<pT<3 GeV/c (normalized to 107 PbPb events) • Advantages: • Global maximization • Easy to add new selection variables dCUT(mm) Elena Bruna

  7. Results: D+K-p+p+ in Pb-Pb (1) • Significance S/√S+B (normalized to 107 ev.) vs pT • Relative statistical error (sS/S =1/√S) on D± vs pT (in 107 ev.) • S/ev~10-3 , B/ev ~10-4 Elena Bruna

  8. Results: D+K-p+p+ in Pb-Pb (2) • Selection efficiency and pT spectra: • pT integrated ε (D+) ≈ 1.5% (Ideal PID), 0.6% (Real PID), 1% (no PID) Elena Bruna

  9. Results: D+K-p+p+ in pp (1) • Signal statistics improved by a factor 2 w.r.t. previous analysis • Significance and relative statistical error vs. D+ pT • S/ev~5 10-6 , B/ev ~5 10-6 • Significance and relative statistical error (=1/S) normalized to 109 pp Minimum Bias events Elena Bruna

  10. Results: D+K-p+p+ in pp (2) • Selection efficiency and pT spectra: • Selection efficiency (pT integrated) ε~ 4% (NO PID) Elena Bruna

  11. Results: Pb-Pb vs pp (PID) (no PID) • sS/S the same for Pb-Pb and pp for 2<pT<8 GeV/c (PID) (no PID) S/√S+B in one year Elena Bruna

  12. Studies on D+ Invariant Mass • Signal Inv. Mass distribution fitted with a Gaussian function, in different D+ pT ranges • Signal normalized to 109 pp randomly generated according to a Gaussian function • The same for the Bkg triplets, but a polinomial function was used Elena Bruna

  13. Invariant mass distributions Statistics enhanced in order to match 1 year of data taking 2<pT<3 GeV/c 0<pT<2 GeV/c pT>5 GeV/c 3<pT<5 GeV/c Elena Bruna

  14. Systematic errors on pp events • Two samples of events: • 1°) pp MB (85%) + pp with charm (14%) and beauty (1%) + events with cD+Kpp (divided in 4 subsamples of pThard) • extract the D+ number with Gaussian fit to the invariant mass distribution: Nsel • 2°) only events with cD+Kpp (divided in 4 subsamples of pThard) • extract the selection efficiency: ε • D+ reconstructed: Nrec=Nsel/e • Nrec calculated for different values of the cut variables Elena Bruna

  15. Nsel vs d (norm to 109) Cut on dprim-sec COUNT From FIT 2<pT<3 GeV/c Nrec vs d (norm to 109) COUNT From FIT e vs d Elena Bruna

  16. Nsel vs cosqpoint (norm to 109) Cut on cosqpoint COUNT From FIT 2<pT<3 GeV/c Nrec vs cosqpoint (norm to 109) COUNT From FIT e vs cosqpoint Elena Bruna

  17. Perspectives for D± elliptic flow • GOAL: Evaluate the statistical error bars for measurements of v2 for D± mesons reconstructed from their Kpp decay in Pb-Pb collisions • v2 vs. centrality (b=collision impact parameter) • v2 vs. pT in different centrality bins • HOW: fast simulation to generate: • ND+ (DpT,Db) with an angular distribution dND/dj = v2D,in cos [2(j-YRP)] • For each D+: an event made of Ntracks is superimposed dN/dj = v2ev,in cos [2(j-YRP)] • Inputs of the simulation: ND+ (DpT,Db) , v2D,in, Ntracks ,v2ev,in • Outputs: v2Dmeasured. Elena Bruna

  18. v2 vs. pT 6<b<9 fm • Large stat. errors on v2 of D± → Kpp in 2·107 MB events • How to increase the statistics? • Sum D0→Kp and D±→Kpp • Sufficient for v2 vs. centrality • Semi-peripheral trigger • v2 vs. pT that would be obtained from 2·107 semi-peripheral events (e.g. 6<b<9 fm) MB trigger Semi-peripheral trigger Elena Bruna

  19. Summary • D+ in PbPb and in pp: • The results show that the D+ → K-p+p+analysis in Pb-Pb and pp is feasible with a pretty good Significance. • The selection strategy based on n-dimensional matrices has been developed. • Recent updates: • Significance in pp improved with enhanced statistics • Invariant mass studies give the expected spectra in 1 year of data taking • No evident systematic error on the selection procedure from a first look: more statistics needed • D+ v2: • Large stat. errors on v2 of D± → Kpp in 2·107 MB events • How to increase the statistics? • Sum D0→Kp and D±→Kpp • Semi-peripheral trigger • Under study the methods for background subtraction Elena Bruna

  20. Backup slides Elena Bruna

  21. Initial Nsel statistics (vs dprim-sec) 2<pT<3 GeV/c 0<pT<2 GeV/c 3<pT<5 GeV/c pT>5 GeV/c Elena Bruna

  22. Initial Nsel statistics (vs cosqpoint) 0<pT<2 GeV/c 2<pT<3 GeV/c 3<pT<5 GeV/c pT>5 GeV/c Elena Bruna

  23. Initial Bkg statistics with |M-Minv|<1s (vs d) 2<pT<3 GeV/c 0<pT<2 GeV/c 3<pT<5 GeV/c pT>5 GeV/c Elena Bruna

  24. Results from RHIC • The Non-Photonic electrons RAA shows interesting results • Suppression is very large when compared to the expectation from radiative energy loss • Other possible mechanisms? • Collisional EL, resonances, in medium fragmentation… • First hint of strong charm v2 for pT<2 GeV/c • Very important, need to disentangle charm from bottom PHENIX nucl-ex/0611018 STAR nucl-ex/0607012 Elena Bruna

  25. Results scaled to a lower multiplicity scenario for Pb-Pb • Results presented so far for Pb-Pb based on dNch/dy=6’000 • Ntracks=7000 • BKG/ev=N(N-1)(N-2)/3! ~ 6x1010 • Extrapolations from RHIC results seem to favour a lower multiplicity scenario, dNch/dy=2’000 • Ntracks~7000/3 ~2300 • BKG/ev ~ 2x109 • Let’s consider the D+ pT interval: 0<pT<2 GeV/c: • The results in the highest multiplicity scenario (dNch/dy=6’000) are not satisfactory • BKG/ev is downscaled by a factor ~30; • SIG/ev not rescaled • S/√S+B (normalized to 107 ev.)~ 10 in case of Real PID: it is possible the study of the low-pT spectra Elena Bruna

  26. Systematic uncertainities on D± measurements • Acceptance, reconstruction and particle identification efficiencies (~10%) • Centrality selection (~7%) • Parameters of the Woods-Saxon profile and nuclear density (~5%) • Nucleon-nucleon inelastic cross section (~5%) • Branching ratio D+K-p+p+(~3.6%) • Feed-down from beauty: NcD± = ND± - NbB  D± • Contamination K= NbB  D±/ NcD± =4% Elena Bruna

  27. Feed-down from beauty • D+ from B are more displaced • The cut on distance between primary to secondary vertex increases the fraction of selected D+ coming from B decay Contamination K vs d d~1000mm  K =10% Histograms normalized to the same area Elena Bruna

More Related