180 likes | 450 Vues
Learn how to assess reference services effectively, justify funding, and enhance user satisfaction. Explore evaluation techniques for print and electronic sources and staff performance to optimize library services.
E N D
Evaluation of Reference Services Dr. Dania Bilal IS 530 Spring 2005
Why Evaluate? • Assess and improve the quality of existing services • Identify the need for new types of services or programs • Justify funding and support
Why Evaluate? • Manage human and physical resources more effectively and efficiently • Justify the need for maintaining services and need for additional programs
Levels of Evaluation • Lancaster’s scheme: • Inputs • Outputs • Outcomes
Levels of Evaluation: Inputs • Materials available to provide a service • Reference collection • print • electronic • CD-ROM, Web, etc.
Levels of Evaluation: Outputs • Measurement of quality of providing a service: • Answering reference questions • accuracy • completeness • Assistance given in using sources
Levels of Evaluation: Outcomes • Meeting user information needs • Level of satisfaction Question: How should professionals assess this satisfaction? • Level of knowledge gained or improved
Standards for Evaluation • Difficulty in establishing quantitative standards • Service should be accurate & complete • Service should satisfy user needs • Standards vary by state & among libraries • Standards for reference services
Evaluation Techniques: Print Sources • Direct examination using criteria • Authority, currency, physical condition, format, target audience, curriculum needs, objectiveness, etc. • Standardized lists • Interlibrary Loan Requests • Collection mapping software
Evaluation Techniques: Electronic Sources • User Interface (search and retrieval) • Command features • User friendliness • Help file/feature(s) • Content • Currency
Evaluation Techniques: Electronic Sources • Record structure • Organization • Navigation & browsability • Visual elements (Icons, metaphors, colors, etc.) • Authority • Update
Evaluation of Reference Staff • Approachability • Knowledge of reference collection • Knowledge of local services and referral • Skills in identifying user needs through a reference interview • Peer evaluation
Evaluation of Reference Transactions • Types: • Obtrusive • Issues & challenges • Unobtrusive • Issues & challenges • Reference statistics
Evaluation of User Satisfaction • Assess satisfaction of all types of users, including specific populations • Techniques • interviews • via telephone • via the Web • via other means