180 likes | 316 Vues
This study assesses the reproducibility of lumen structures in relation to varying concentrations of contrast media (CM) using 3D Rotational Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). We examine the effectiveness and reliability of the 3D RA system at the Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) in providing precise morphological assessments while minimizing CM-induced renal toxicity. Key metrics include scan methods, injection rates, and geometric distortions affecting the resolution. Results indicate significant findings related to the dilution ratios of CM and the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on lumen visualization.
E N D
박 천 웅 3D rotational DSA를 이용한 조영제 농도별 관강구조물의 재현성 평가 SNUH SNUH
Assesment of Morphology Endovascular treatment Stereotactic surgery Introduction Usefulness of 3D RA
Precision & accuracy assessment Reduction of CM-induced renal toxicity Reduction of CM usage Assessment of reliability Objectives
Flat panel detector X-ray tube Detector size Anode heat storage capacity 42 x 52 cm 2400 kHU Matrix/lines Cooling system 2048 x 2048 Direct oil cooling Photodiode layer Nominal power A-Si 30/65 kw Allura Xper FD 20 Materials and methods
Allura 3D-RA Materials and methods
Contrast Media Phantom Materials and methods
Roll scan Prop. scan Geometry Geometry - Head - Side Range Range - +120°~-120° - +90°~-90° - 4sec - 8sec Scan time Scan time - 120 - 240 Images Images Materials and methods
X-ray system 3D workstation 3D data acquisition 3D Reconstruction Materials and methods
144.26± 0.18 143.59± 0.12 144.17± 0.28 144.85± 0.12 144.85± 0.26 144.60± 0.23 144.55± 0.04 144.85± 0.26 144.91± 0.13 5.41± 0.22 5.24± 0.00 5.36± 0.13 9.18± 0.12 9.18± 0.11 9.06± 0.22 19.49± 0.13 19.38± 0.19 19.32± 0.22 SL ML LL SW MW LW Actual 145 145 145 6.5 10.5 20.5 원액 1:1 2:1 Difference by dilution ratio of CM
SL ML LL SW MW LW 145 145 145 6.5 10.5 20.5 Actual 144.02± 0.32 144.70± 0.20 144.74± 0.24 5.28± 0.09 9.13± 0.15 19.34± 0.22 Roll 143.99± 0.43 144.60± 0.22 144.80± 0.20 5.39± 0.19 9.16± 0.17 19.46± 0.12 Prop Difference by scan method
SL ML LL SW MW LW 145 145 145 6.5 10.5 20.5 143.88± 0.29 144.68± 0.24 144.76± 0.22 5.28± 0.09 9.12± 0.15 19.42± 0.17 144.13± 0.40 144.63± 0.22 144.78± 0.22 5.39± 0.19 9.16± 0.17 19.38± 0.20 Actual 無 有 Difference by existence of bony structure
Resolution by dilution ratio of CM 원액 1:1 2:1
Resolution by scan method Roll scan Prop. scan
Intrinsic factor of lumen Reconstruction algorithm Injection rate Rendering mode Variable factor of 3D RA Total injection volume Geometric distortion Extrinsic factor of lumen User’s adjustment Conclusion