1 / 19

EPRI SCDC Cable Review Meeting Palo Alto 24 th October 2006

EPRI SCDC Cable Review Meeting Palo Alto 24 th October 2006. Meeting May 22-26th Sevenoaks UK Progress since. Sevenoaks Meeting: 22-26 th May 2006. Agreed cable types: 2 x monopoles 100% redundancy Agreed target ratings: 10 GW (2x10 GW) 2 GW (2 x 1 GW)

roanna-fleming
Télécharger la présentation

EPRI SCDC Cable Review Meeting Palo Alto 24 th October 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EPRI SCDC Cable Review MeetingPalo Alto 24th October 2006 • Meeting May 22-26th Sevenoaks UK • Progress since

  2. Sevenoaks Meeting: 22-26th May 2006 • Agreed cable types: • 2 x monopoles • 100% redundancy • Agreed target ratings: • 10 GW (2x10 GW) • 2 GW (2 x 1 GW) • Developed cable design spread sheet • Add BSCCO PIT characteristic: I, H, T • Actions: (See Bill’s slides) • Method to determine Magnetic field and PIT current/wire at outer surface of inner conductor • Circulate spreadsheet • In parallel prepare vacuum and cryogenic info to add • In parallel to add cable losses • In parallel to add circuit parameters

  3. Progress Since May • Spread sheet: • Added magnetic field and PIT current/wire at outer surface of inner conductor • Circulated Spreadsheet and ‘instructions’ • Patent proposals submitted to EPRI: ‘contraction compensation’ • Produced draft DC cable ‘design primer’ • Performed preliminary sensitivity study to identify limiting boundaries (to present later) • Performed outline search for extrudable insulation materials

  4. DC Cable Configuration

  5. Bi-Pole’s Advantages: Simplest Construction, Half-Insulation Thicknessand Smaller Diameter and Longer CableConventional Bi-Pole Designs are Unsuitable • No ground return, so lose one cable, lose circuit. • Mutual magnetic field is perpendicular to PIT conductor • Ground conductor is added to give N+1 security • No outer HTSC shield: field is not contained • Mutual magnetic field is perpendicular to PIT conductors

  6. Selected Design: Two MonopolesGround Returns Must be Current Carriers Integrated HTSC Ground return conductor +ve pole -ve pole Integrated HTSC Ground return conductor • Half insulation thickness of one monopole • One third insulation thickness of a single integrated bi-pole • Ground conductors are added to give N+1 security • Concentric HTSC conductor: field is parallel to PIT: OK • No mutual magnetic field Does this cause problems to the bridge design and control? Opposite or same polarity poles?

  7. DC Cable Sensitivity Study: Boundary Limitations • Dry cable construction, extruded insulation, can be factory HV tested, joints are simplest. • Voltage and current: no restriction • Fault circuit current: 2 x rated current for 1 sec and 1K rise • Maximum number of tapes in one pass on present stranding machines is 150. Perhaps extend to 250? (Need to ask manufacturers). See video of cable factory. • Reel: • outer diameter: 4.2m • hub diameter: 20D (D is cable OD) • Width:2.4m (could increase) • Cable net weight: 30ton (could increase). • Installation: See video of cable factory • Tensile load: F=COF x Unit Mass x Length • Maximum safe load on cable= 50N/mm2 of stranded conductor area. • PIT tape: • Present BSCCO minimum bend diameter: 70mm • Will tape width conform to circumference?

  8. Present Spread Sheet Limits for 75mm OD Conductor Show: • We need more tapes than present strander machine limit of 150 tapes • Optimum voltage is ~100-120kV

  9. For 75mm OD Conductor: • 1 GW rating is OK • 2 GW: too many tapes needed

  10. No Duct Case: • 1GW Cable is OK at 70kV and above with <150 tapes • Optimum voltage for min OD is 120kV • Max cable length on reel is 6.2kM, but reel weight is high at 38.4t

  11. 20mm Duct Case: • 1GW Cable is OK at 70kV and above with <150 tapes • Optimum voltage for min OD is 120-150kV • Max cable length on reel is 4.4kM, but reel weight is OK at 27-32t

  12. 40mm Duct Case: • 1GW Cable is OK at 70kV and above with <150 tapes • Optimum voltage for min OD is 100-120kV • Max cable length on reel is 2.8kM and reel weight is OK at 22-25t

  13. 1 GW with no central duct: Optimum voltage is 120kV

  14. Minimum voltage is 70kV, OK for <150 wires

  15. At optimum 120kV only need 76 wires, so can double current and power to 2GW?

  16. 1GW Study Conclusions: To achieve 5 GW need: 5 x Increase in current per tape, or a very long factory strander, or a multi-pass application?

  17. 1GW: Unit weight falls with voltage

  18. 1GW with no central duct: very long length is possible

  19. 120kV Constant Voltage and Increment Current and Power with BSCCO 125A: • At 150 tape limit can achieve 1.8GW • At 316 tape limit can achieve 3.6GW • At 450 tape limit can achieve 5GW • At 5GW, reel length falls to 2km • At 5GW, reel weight is high at 56.5t

More Related