1 / 32

Demonstration of Subaqueous Disposal of Mill Waste

Demonstration of Subaqueous Disposal of Mill Waste. Dave Hinrichs, NewFields Mark Doolan, U.S. EPA Chris Wienecke, ATT Sunoco and Jasper County Group R. Fischer and K. Tegtmeyer, NewFields. Mill Waste Characteristics. Chat – from Barnsdall No. 3 mine, Kansas

robbin
Télécharger la présentation

Demonstration of Subaqueous Disposal of Mill Waste

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Demonstration of Subaqueous Disposal of Mill Waste Dave Hinrichs, NewFields Mark Doolan, U.S. EPA Chris Wienecke, ATT Sunoco and Jasper County Group R. Fischer and K. Tegtmeyer, NewFields

  2. Mill Waste Characteristics • Chat – from Barnsdall No. 3 mine, Kansas • Tailings – from Barnsdall No. 2 mine, Missouri • Tailings - net-alkaline, permeability 2 x 10-7 minimal ARD • Tailings – lab 0.03 ft/ft vertical settlement • Concentrations in tailings backfill • Zinc = 18,730 mg/kg • Lead = 570 mg/kg • Cadmium = 130 mg/kg

  3. Subsidence pit at Remedial Soil Repository West of Prosperity

  4. Jasper Co. Site Subsidence Pit at North Edge of Remedial repository

  5. Jasper Co. Site Subsidence Pits Subsidence Pit South of Carterville off of Lewis St.

  6. Jasper Co. Site Subsidence PitWest of Carterville Off of Wilson St.

  7. Existing Site Conditions

  8. Subaqueous Disposal Theory • Place waste in the saturated zone, cap and reduce oxygen by 10,000x • Establish reducing/anaerobic conditions to reduce or eliminate ARD and metals release • Lower disposal and O & M costs • Eliminate pit as trash dumping site • Eliminate as storm runoff metal load source

  9. Expected Results of Subaqueous Disposal • Short-term zinc loading to aquifer • Shift from strongly oxidizing to reducing conditions, i.e., lower eH • Increase in pH to mildly alkaline • Greatly reduced rate of sulfide oxidation, ARD, and metals release compared to above-ground repository

  10. Subaqueous Disposal Setting

  11. Mechanisms for Metals Release in Subaqueous Setting • Short term • Dissolution of reactive secondary minerals • Long term • Stable sulfide minerals, dependent on final eH and pH conditions

  12. Galena Leach Study

  13. Subaqueous Field Demonstration Jasper County, Missouri • Selected P4 Pond at Freehold mine in Kansas • Installed two monitoring wells in Boone aquifer • MDNR conducted dye tracing study • Collected 2 rounds of baseline samples, pre-backfill • Backfilled 200 ft x 200 ft x 35 ft pit • Installed Well P4 Central in July 2002 • Collected 4 rounds of post-backfill samples • NewFields prepared summary report, Dec. 2003

  14. Demonstration Site Map

  15. Pond P-4

  16. Site Conditions • Shallow aquifer confined; gradient est. = 0.0008 • Local shale hydraulic gradient est. = 0.01 • Pit depth 35 feet; Penn shale 75 feet thick • Freehold mine depth of 120 - 180 ft in Miss. limestone • Pond water level 2 – 13 feet higher than shallow aquifer, poor hydraulic inter-connection • Water levels in pits showed dramatic rise and fall with storm events

  17. Pit Filling • Filled pit with 58,500 yds3 of chat and tailings March - July 2002 • Surcharged to plus 4 feet • Capped with 1.5 ft of topsoil • Volunteer revegetation

  18. Pond 4 - filling

  19. Pond 4 - Post Filling

  20. Filled Pit

  21. Filled Pit Monitoring • Installed wells P4NW and P15E Dec 2001 • Collected 2 rounds of baseline samples, pre-backfill • Installed Well P4 Central in July 2002 • Collected 4 rounds of post-fill samples

  22. Dissolved Zinc Concentrations

  23. P4 Pond Redox

  24. ZINC LOAD ESTIMATES

  25. Conclusions • Subaqueous disposal did not increase metal loading to shallow aquifer due to low permeability/poor connection • Subaqueous disposal should substantially reduce metals loading to surface streams • Post-remedy footprint reduced = lower O & M cost • Jasper County FS includes subaqueous disposal as a permanent, moderate cost alternative to conventional cap and cover • Placement of wastes in mine pits reduces pit associated hazards and illegal dumping

  26. Pit Selection • Prioritize pits that are or can be hydraulically isolated from shallow aquifer. Indicators: low or negative eH, low O2, poor vegetation and aquatic community Rapid increase in water level if recharged Slow to recover when test-pumped • Prioritize pits that pose physical hazards, are used as trash dumps, or offer marginal aquatic habitat.

  27. Engineering Aspects • With scrapers and dozers, cost $4.50/cy • Tailings can be used in low-permeability caps and liners. • Using chat only = higher predicted zinc loads; mix tails with chat or fly ash • Predict consolidation before backfill • Surcharge pits and/or allow time for settlement before placing the soil cap.

More Related