130 likes | 246 Vues
The first quarter of 2008 has revealed troubling trends in energy lending as banks face deteriorating real estate portfolios and shrinking profits. Loan loss provisions have quadrupled compared to Q1 2007, while charge-offs reached a five-year high. As market liquidity pressures mount, banks have tightened underwriting standards, which impacts loan pricing and borrower requirements. Despite the challenges, energy remains a desirable sector, with opportunities for well-capitalized banks to improve their positions in this evolving landscape.
E N D
TRENDS IN ENERGY LENDING 7 August 2008
FIRST QUARTER 2008 BANK INDUSTRY PERFORMANCE • Deteriorating real estate portfolios – loan loss provisions 4 times 1st quarter 2007 • Shrinking profits - especially largest banks • Lower non-interest revenues: trading and loan sales • Charge-offs climbed to a five-year high • Past due loans increased 24% from 4th quarter 2007 • Of banks that paid dividends, half were lowered
REPERCUSSIONS • Banks’ underwriting standards have tightened • Reasons: market liquidity/capital pressure, economic outlook, risk appetite, loan performance and the financial condition of some banks. • The impact of this tightening is seen in loan pricing, covenants, collateral, guarantor requirements, and equity requirements. • Standards that have eased…..maturity and amortization.
INDICATIONSOF STRESS • Stock price of top 20 energy banks – DOWN 29% LTM (vs. 9% down for DJA) • Cost of external debt capital for banks • LIBOR + 300 bps (more for troubled banks)
ENERGY SEGMENT – STILL DESIRABLE Estimated Energy Loan Commitments - Largest Energy Banks Bank12/31/0612/31/07 Citigroup $25 B $31 B Bank of America $19 B $24 B JP Morgan Chase $18 B $26 B BNP Paribas* $ 8 B $14 B Wachovia $ 6 B $ 7 B • Includes impact of currency fluctuation
IMPACT OF ENERGY PRICES • Positive: Lender price decks are climbing • Median prices for oil and gas* • 2008: $70.00/$7.00 • 2009: $67.75/$6.75 • 2010: $61.25/$6.50 • 2011: $60.00/$6.25 • 2012: $60.00/$6.15 • Negative: Calculated exposure for commodity hedges has ballooned due to price volatility - exacerbates capital allocation issues. * Tristone Capital, Inc. Energy Lender Price Survey, Q3/08
IMPACT OF BANKS’ STRESS ON ENERGY CLIENTS • Certain formerly stout players in the lending market have scaled back both lending and hedging • Very active secondary senior loan market • Push-back on stretch deals due to capital allocation issues • Lower hold limits on loans • Failed syndications • Fewer transactions fully underwritten • Structures becoming more conventional • Interest margin up +/- 25 bps; up-front fees higher
OTHER….. • Impact of new entrants in energy lending market uncertain. • Semgroup bankruptcy – bad timing.
OPPORTUNITIES • For well-capitalized banks……get your phone calls returned. • Improve position in credits at attractive prices. • Enhanced cross-sell opportunities. • Banks with hedging capacity desired. • Rewards for stepping up: sharing of bond economics and equity issuance fees.
FUTURE • Some old names will exit/merge/go away. • Competition will be somewhat abated. • More banks per credit facility.
QUESTIONS • Will banks’ capital crunch slow down oil and gas acquisitions? • Where does it end? • Who will be left?