1 / 1

Evaluating Confidence Arguments in Support of Tool Support Duplication

Explore the significance of confidence arguments in providing assurance amidst quantification challenges. Review the importance of domain experience and focus in addressing assurance deficits. Delve into the value of tool support within prescriptive vs. non-prescribable reasoning contexts.

rolf
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating Confidence Arguments in Support of Tool Support Duplication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Confidence is an important issue • Various ways of expressing / addressing the issue • Defeaters, Assurance Deficits, Confidence Arguments, Quantification • And the winner is …? • Review / Evaluation is an important issue • Odds are stacked against evaluators • Domain experience important (re: counter evidence) • E.g. why confidence arguments (historically: process) are important • Focus of arguments is an important issue • Not all assurance cases are equal • The automatable isn’t necessarily where the value is • Prescriptive (syntactical) structures (e.g. ISO26262) vs. Non-prescribable reasoning (for the specifics of a given project) • Tool Support is an important issue • We seem to be duplicating efforts • Open, free, reactive, tool support highly desirable

More Related