1 / 54

Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University

Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University. Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence. Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial Population . Test of Independence. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson and Normal Distributions.

ronald
Télécharger la présentation

Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University

  2. Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence • Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial Population • Test of Independence • Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson and Normal Distributions

  3. Hypothesis (Goodness of Fit) Testfor Proportions of a Multinomial Population 1. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses. 2. Select a random sample and record the observed frequency, fi , for each of the k categories. 3. Assuming H0 is true, compute the expected frequency, ei , in each category by multiplying the category probability by the sample size.

  4. Hypothesis (Goodness of Fit) Testfor Proportions of a Multinomial Population 4. Compute the value of the test statistic. where: fi = observed frequency for category i ei = expected frequency for category i k = number of categories Note: The test statistic has a chi-square distribution with k – 1 df provided that the expected frequencies are 5 or more for all categories.

  5. Reject H0 if Hypothesis (Goodness of Fit) Testfor Proportions of a Multinomial Population 5. Rejection rule: Reject H0 if p-value <a p-value approach: Critical value approach: where  is the significance level and there are k - 1 degrees of freedom

  6. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) Finger Lakes Homes manufactures four models of prefabricated homes, a two-story colonial, a log cabin, a split-level, and an A-frame. To help in production planning, management would like to determine if previous customer purchases indicate that there is a preference in the style selected.

  7. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) The number of homes sold of each model for 100 sales over the past two years is shown below. Split- A- Model Colonial Log Level Frame # Sold 30 20 35 15

  8. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Hypotheses H0: pC = pL = pS = pA = .25 Ha: The population proportions are not pC = .25, pL = .25, pS = .25, and pA = .25 where: pC = population proportion that purchase a colonial pL = population proportion that purchase a log cabin pS = population proportion that purchase a split-level pA = population proportion that purchase an A-frame

  9. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Rejection Rule Reject H0 if p-value < .05 or c2 > 7.815. With  = .05 and k - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3 degrees of freedom Do Not Reject H0 Reject H0 2 7.815

  10. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Expected Frequencies • Test Statistic • e1 = .25(100) = 25 e2 = .25(100) = 25 e3 = .25(100) = 25 e4 = .25(100) = 25 = 1 + 1 + 4 + 4 = 10

  11. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach Area in Upper Tail .10 .05 .025 .01 .005 c2 Value (df = 3) 6.251 7.815 9.348 11.345 12.838 Because c2= 10 is between 9.348 and 11.345, the area in the upper tail of the distribution is between .025 and .01. The p-value <a . We can reject the null hypothesis.

  12. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Conclusion Using the Critical Value Approach c2 = 10 > 7.815 We reject, at the .05 level of significance, the assumption that there is no home style preference.

  13. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Excel Worksheet (showing data) Note: Rows 13-101 are not shown.

  14. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Excel Formula Worksheet Note: Columns A-B and rows 13-101 are not shown.

  15. Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Excel Value Worksheet Note: Columns A-B and rows 13-101 are not shown.

  16. Test of Independence: Contingency Tables 1. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses. 2. Select a random sample and record the observed frequency, fij , for each cell of the contingency table. 3. Compute the expected frequency, eij , for each cell.

  17. Reject H0 if p -value <a or . Test of Independence: Contingency Tables 4. Compute the test statistic. 5. Determine the rejection rule. where  is the significance level and, with n rows and m columns, there are (n - 1)(m - 1) degrees of freedom.

  18. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B) Each home sold by Finger Lakes Homes can be classified according to price and to style. Finger Lakes’ manager would like to determine if the price of the home and the style of the home are independent variables.

  19. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B) The number of homes sold for each model and price for the past two years is shown below. For convenience, the price of the home is listed as either $99,000 or less or more than $99,000. Price Colonial Log Split-Level A-Frame < $99,000 18 6 19 12 > $99,000 12 14 16 3

  20. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Hypotheses H0: Price of the home is independent of the style of the home that is purchased Ha: Price of the home is not independent of the style of the home that is purchased

  21. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Expected Frequencies Price Colonial Log Split-Level A-Frame Total < $99K > $99K Total 18 6 19 12 55 12 14 16 3 45 30 20 35 15 100

  22. With  = .05 and (2 - 1)(4 - 1) = 3 d.f., Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Rejection Rule Reject H0 if p-value < .05 or 2> 7.815 • Test Statistic = .1364 + 2.2727 + . . . + 2.0833 = 9.149

  23. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach Area in Upper Tail .10 .05 .025 .01 .005 c2 Value (df = 3) 6.251 7.815 9.348 11.345 12.838 Because c2= 9.145 is between 7.815 and 9.348, the area in the upper tail of the distribution is between .05 and .025. The p-value <a . We can reject the null hypothesis.

  24. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Conclusion Using the Critical Value Approach c2 = 9.145 > 7.815 We reject, at the .05 level of significance, the assumption that the price of the home is independent of the style of home that is purchased.

  25. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Excel Worksheet (showing data) Note: Rows 11-101 are not shown.

  26. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Excel Worksheet (showing Pivot Table) Note: Columns A-C are not shown.

  27. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Excel Formula Worksheet Note: Columns A-C are not shown.

  28. Contingency Table (Independence) Test • Excel Value Worksheet Note: Columns A-C are not shown.

  29. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution 1. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: Population has a Poisson probability distribution Ha: Population does not have a Poisson distribution 2. Select a random sample and a. Record the observed frequency fi for each value of the Poisson random variable. b. Compute the mean number of occurrences . 3. Compute the expected frequency of occurrences ei for each value of the Poisson random variable.

  30. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution 4. Compute the value of the test statistic. where: fi = observed frequency for category i ei = expected frequency for category i k = number of categories

  31. Reject H0 if Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution 5. Rejection rule: Reject H0 if p-value <a p-value approach: Critical value approach: where  is the significance level and there are k - 2 degrees of freedom

  32. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Example: Troy Parking Garage In studying the need for an additional entrance to a city parking garage, a consultant has recommended an analysis approach that is applicable only in situations where the number of cars entering during a specified time period follows a Poisson distribution.

  33. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Example: Troy Parking Garage A random sample of 100 one- minute time intervals resulted in the customer arrivals listed below. A statistical test must be conducted to see if the assumption of a Poisson distribution is reasonable. # Arrivals0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Frequency 0 1 4 10 14 20 12 12 9 8 6 3 1

  34. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Hypotheses H0: Number of cars entering the garage during a one-minute interval is Poisson distributed Ha: Number of cars entering the garage during a one-minute interval is not Poisson distributed

  35. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Estimate of Poisson Probability Function otal Arrivals = 0(0) + 1(1) + 2(4) + . . . + 12(1) = 600 Estimate of  = 600/100 = 6 Total Time Periods = 100 Hence,

  36. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Expected Frequencies x f (x ) nf (x ) xf (x ) nf (x ) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12+ Total .0025 .0149 .0446 .0892 .1339 .1606 .1606 .25 1.49 4.46 8.92 13.39 16.06 16.06 .1377 .1033 .0688 .0413 .0225 .0201 1.0000 13.77 10.33 6.88 4.13 2.25 2.01 100.00

  37. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Observed and Expected Frequencies ifieifi - ei -1.20 1.08 0.61 3.94 -4.06 -1.77 -1.33 1.12 1.61 5 10 14 20 12 12 9 8 10 0 or 1 or 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or more 6.20 8.92 13.39 16.06 16.06 13.77 10.33 6.88 8.39

  38. With  = .05 and k - p - 1 = 9 - 1 - 1 = 7 d.f. (where k = number of categories and p = number of population parameters estimated), Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Rejection Rule • Test Statistic Reject H0 if p-value < .05 or 2> 14.067.

  39. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach Area in Upper Tail .90 .10 .05 .025 .01 c2 Value (df = 7) 2.833 12.017 14.067 16.013 18.475 Because c2= 3.268 is between 2.833 and 12.017 in the Chi-Square Distribution Table, the area in the upper tail of the distribution is between .90 and .10. The p-value > a . We cannot reject the null hypothesis. There is no reason to doubt the assumption of a Poisson distribution.

  40. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Excel Formula Worksheet

  41. Goodness of Fit Test: Poisson Distribution • Excel Value Worksheet

  42. Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution 1. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses. 2. Select a random sample and a. Compute the mean and standard deviation. b. Define intervals of values so that the expected frequency is at least 5 for each interval. c. For each interval record the observed frequencies 3. Compute the expected frequency, ei , for each interval.

  43. 5. Reject H0 if (where  is the significance level and there are k - 3 degrees of freedom). Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution 4. Compute the value of the test statistic.

  44. IQ Normal Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Example: IQ Computers IQ Computers (one better than HP?) manufactures and sells a general purpose microcomputer. As part of a study to evaluate sales personnel, management wants to determine, at a .05 significance level, if the annual sales volume (number of units sold by a salesperson) follows a normal probability distribution.

  45. IQ Normal Distribution Goodness of Fit Test A simple random sample of 30 of the salespeople was taken and their numbers of units sold are below. • Example: IQ Computers 33 43 44 45 52 52 56 58 63 64 64 65 66 68 70 72 73 73 74 75 83 84 85 86 91 92 94 98 102 105 (mean = 71, standard deviation = 18.54)

  46. Normal Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Hypotheses H0: The population of number of units sold has a normal distribution with mean 71 and standard deviation 18.54. Ha: The population of number of units sold does not have a normal distribution with mean 71 and standard deviation 18.54.

  47. Normal Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Interval Definition To satisfy the requirement of an expected frequency of at least 5 in each interval we will divide the normal distribution into 30/5 = 6 equal probability intervals.

  48. Normal Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Interval Definition Areas = 1.00/6 = .1667 53.02 71 88.98 = 71 + .97(18.54) 71 - .43(18.54) = 63.03 78.97

  49. Normal Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Observed and Expected Frequencies ifieifi - ei 6 3 6 5 4 6 30 5 5 5 5 5 5 30 1 -2 1 0 -1 1 Less than 53.02 53.02 to 63.03 63.03 to 71.00 71.00 to 78.97 78.97 to 88.98 More than 88.98 Total

  50. With  = .05 and k - p - 1 = 6 - 2 - 1 = 3 d.f. (where k = number of categories and p = number of population parameters estimated), Normal Distribution Goodness of Fit Test • Rejection Rule Reject H0 if p-value < .05 or 2> 7.815. • Test Statistic

More Related