1 / 73

Latest Developments in fMRI

Latest Developments in fMRI. Peter A. Bandettini, Ph.D Unit on Functional Imaging Methods & 3T Neuroimaging Core Facility Laboratory of Brain and Cognition National Institute of Mental Health. The use of fMRI for the Investigation of Brain Function and Physiology. Where? When?

ronan-hodges
Télécharger la présentation

Latest Developments in fMRI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Latest Developments in fMRI Peter A. Bandettini, Ph.D Unit on Functional Imaging Methods & 3T Neuroimaging Core Facility Laboratory of Brain and Cognition National Institute of Mental Health

  2. The use of fMRI for the Investigation of Brain Function and Physiology • Where? • When? • How much? • How to get the brain to do what we want it to • do in the context of an fMRI experiment? • (limitations: limited time and signal to noise, motion, acoustic noise) • How much more information can we obtain?

  3. Neuronal Measured Activation fMRI Signal ? ? Hemodynamics Physiologic Factors

  4. A Primary Challenge for Observing Brain Activation: ...to make progressively more precise inferences without making too many assumptions about non-neuronal physiologic factors.

  5. Contrast in Functional MRI • Blood Volume • Contrast agent injection and time series collection of T2* or T2 - weighted images • BOLD • Time series collection of T2* or T2 - weighted images • Perfusion • T1 weighting • Arterial spin labeling

  6. RestingActive

  7. BOLD Contrast in the Detection of Neuronal Activity Cerebral Tissue Activation Local Vasodilation Oxygen Delivery Exceeds Metabolic Need Increase in Cerebral Blood Flow and Volume Increase in Capillary and Venous Blood Oxygenation Deoxy-hemoglobin: paramagnetic Oxy-hemoglobin: diamagnetic Decrease in Deoxy-hemoglobin Decrease in susceptibility-related intravoxel dephasing Increase in T2 and T2* Local Signal Increase in T2 and T2* - weighted sequences

  8. The BOLD Signal Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal changes task task

  9. Alternating Left and Right Finger Tapping ~1992

  10. Perfusion / Flow Imaging EPISTAR FAIR . . . - - - - Perfusion Time Series . . .

  11. TI (ms) 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 FAIR EPISTAR

  12. Resting ASL Signal

  13. Comparison with Positron Emission Tomography PET: H215O MRI: ASL

  14. Pushingthe Envelope… • Temporal Resolution • Spatial Resolution • Sensitivity and Noise • Information Content • Implementation

  15. Pushingthe Envelope… • Temporal Resolution • Spatial Resolution • Sensitivity and Noise • Information Content • Implementation

  16. time Anatomic Functional

  17. Echo-Planar Imaging

  18. 2 1000 msec 1.5 100 msec 34 msec 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 15 20 25 30 35 Time (sec)

  19. Word stem completion

  20. + 2 sec Latency - 2 sec Magnitude

  21. Regions of Interest Used for Hemi-Field Experiment Left Hemisphere Right Hemisphere

  22. 9.0 seconds 15 seconds 500 msec 500 msec 20 30 10 Time (seconds)

  23. 3.2 2.4 1.6 0.8 0 -0.8 -1.6 -2.4 0 10 20 30 Hemi-field with 500 msec asynchrony Average of 6 runs Standard Deviations Shown Percent MR Signal Strength Time (seconds)

  24. 500 ms 500 ms RightHemifield Left Hemifield + 2.5 s - = 0 s - 2.5 s

  25. 11026–11031 PNAS September 26, 2000vol. 97 no. 20

  26. Pushingthe Envelope… • Temporal Resolution • Spatial Resolution • Sensitivity and Noise • Information Content • Implementation

  27. Single Shot Imaging T2* decay EPI Readout Window ≈ 20 to 40 ms

  28. T2* decay EPI Window 1 Multishot Imaging T2* decay EPI Window 2

  29. T2* decay EPI Window Partial k-space imaging

  30. Multi Shot EPI Excitations 1 2 4 8 Matrix Size 64 x 64 128 x 128 256 x 128 256 x 256

  31. Perfusion Rest Activation BOLD

  32. Anatomy BOLD Perfusion

  33. Hemodynamic Specificity Arterial inflow (BOLD TR < 500 ms) Venous inflow (Perf. No VN)

  34. ODC Maps using fMRI 1 cm calcarine • Identical in size, orientation, and appearance to those obtained by optical imaging1 and histology3,4. 1Malonek D, Grinvald A. Science 272, 551-4 (1996). 3Horton JC, Hocking DR. J Neurosci 16, 7228-39 (1996). 4Horton JC, et al. Arch Ophthalmol 108, 1025-31 (1990).

  35. Why short is better than long It is argued that fMRI cannot achieve submillimeter functional resolution because a saturated hyperoxic vascular response to neural activity spreads over many millimeters1,2. However, optical imaging has demonstrated that the hyperoxic response can yield well-localized maps when using short duration stimuli (<5 sec)1. The vascular response to prolonged neural stimulation [Oxy] ~12 sec The vascular response to brief neural stimulation 1Malonek D, Grinvald A. Science 272, 551-4 (1996). 2Kim D-S, Duong T, Kim S-G. Nat Neurosci 3, 164-9 (2000).

  36. Pushingthe Envelope… • Temporal Resolution • Spatial Resolution • Sensitivity and Noise • Information Content • Implementation

  37. 1000 800 600 400 200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Temporal S/N vs. Image S/N PHANTOMS SUBJECTS 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Temporal S/N Temporal S/N 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Image S/N Image S/N N. Petridou

  38. Pushingthe Envelope… • Temporal Resolution • Spatial Resolution • Sensitivity and Noise • Information Content • Implementation

  39. Motor Cortex Auditory Cortex

  40. time (s) Different stimulus “ON” periods measured linear BOLD Response Signal Stimulus timing 0.25 s 0.5 s 1 s 2 s 20 s Brief stimuli produce larger responses than expected

More Related