1 / 30

St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting

St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting. What is Student Engagement?. …the amount of time and energy students invest in meaningful educational practices

ronni
Télécharger la présentation

St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. St. Petersburg CollegeCCSSE 2011 FindingsBoard of Trustees Meeting

  2. What is Student Engagement? …the amount of time and energy students invest in meaningful educational practices …the institutional practices and student behaviors that are highly correlated with student learning and retention SPC Board of Trustees Meeting

  3. The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SPC Board of Trustees Meeting CCSSE is designed to capture student engagement as a measure of institutional quality.

  4. Student Respondent Profile • Administered in Spring 2011 (planned for Spring 2012) Out of 1,168 SPC survey respondents… SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  5. Student Respondent Profile Out of 1,168 SPC survey respondents… SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  6. CCSSE BenchmarksActive and Collaborative LearningStudent EffortAcademic ChallengeStudent-Faculty InteractionSupport for Learners

  7. CCSSE Benchmarks Active and Collaborative Learning. Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with real-life situations and problems. Student Effort. Students’ own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting

  8. CCSSE Benchmarks Academic Challenge. Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. These survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the rigor of examinations used to evaluate student performance. Student-Faculty Interaction. In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and to persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting

  9. CCSSE Benchmarks Support for Learners. Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that provide important support services, cultivate positive relationships among groups on campus, and demonstrate commitment to their success. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting

  10. CCSSE Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College Compared to Colleges of Similar Size SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25 across all respondents. Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  11. CCSSE Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice Historical CCSSE Benchmark Score Trends for St. Petersburg College SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25 across all respondents. Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  12. Aspects of Highest Student Engagement CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College Compared to 2011 CCSSE Cohort BenchmarkItem No.Item Active and Collaborative Learning 4b Made a class presentation Student Effort 4d Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources Student-Faculty Interaction 4k Used email to communicate with an instructor Academic Challenge 5e Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Academic Challenge 6c Number of written papers or reports of any length Notes: For Item(s) 4, ‘Often’ and ‘Very Often’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 5, ‘Quite a bit’ and ‘Very much’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 6, ‘5 to 10,’ ‘11 to 20,’ and ‘More than 20’ responses are combined. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25 across all respondents.

  13. Aspects of Highest Student Engagement A History of CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College BenchmarkItem No.Item Active and Collaborative Learning 4b Made a class presentation Student Effort 4d Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources Student-Faculty Interaction 4k Used email to communicate with an instructor Academic Challenge 5e Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Academic Challenge 6c Number of written papers or reports of any length Notes: For Item(s) 4, ‘Often’ and ‘Very Often’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 5, ‘Quite a bit’ and ‘Very much’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 6, ‘5 to 10,’ ‘11 to 20,’ and ‘More than 20’ responses are combined. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  14. Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College Compared to 2011 CCSSE Cohort BenchmarkItem No.Item Active and Collaborative Learning 4f Worked with other students on projects during class Student Effort 4m Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor Student-Faculty Interaction 4q Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework Academic Challenge 9d Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Academic Challenge 13h1 Frequency: Computer lab Notes: For Item(s) 4, ‘Often’ and ‘Very Often’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 9, ‘Quite a bit’ and ‘Very much’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 13,’Sometimes’ ‘and ‘Often’ are combined. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25 across all respondents.

  15. Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement A History of CCSSE Benchmark Scores for St. Petersburg College BenchmarkItem No.Item Active and Collaborative Learning 4f Worked with other students on projects during class Student Effort 4m Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor Student-Faculty Interaction 4q Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework Academic Challenge 9d Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Academic Challenge 13h1 Frequency: Computer lab Notes: For Item(s) 4, ‘Often’ and ‘Very Often’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 9, ‘Quite a bit’ and ‘Very much’ responses are combined; For Item(s) 13,’Sometimes’ ‘and ‘Often’ are combined. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  16. SPC Internal Comparisons • Active and Collaborative Learning During the current school year, how often have you: • Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions (65.2% very often or often) • Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course (7.2% very often or often) • Student Effort During the current school year, how often have you: • Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources (74.3% very often or often) • Used peer or other tutoring services (29.2%often or sometimes) • Academic Challenge During the current school year, how often have you: • Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor’s standards or expectations (56.6% very often or often) • Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments (22.2% very often or often) SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  17. SPC Internal Comparisons • Student-Faculty Interaction During the current school year, how often have you: • Used e-mail to communicate with an instructor (68.3% very often or often) • Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework (8.7% very often or often) • Support for Learners How much does this college emphasize: • Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college (75.3% very much or quite a bit) • Helping you cope with your nonacademic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) (23.3% very much or quite a bit) SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  18. CCSSE Special Focus Items • 90.3% of students were registered for ALL courses before the first class session(s). • 54.1% took part in either an online or on campus orientation prior to the beginning of classes, but 25.8% were not aware of a college orientation. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting

  19. SPC Special Focus Items • 79.5% of students strongly agree or agree that this year, they have tried to better understand someone else’s views by imagining how an issue looks from his or her perspective. • 50.7% of students very often or often learned something that changed his or her viewpoint about an issue or concept. • 59.1% of students this year have very often or often considered ideas different from his/her own. • 23.7% of students this year have used the academic support services, e.g., tutoring and academic assistance. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting

  20. Community College Student: Aspirations and Persistence

  21. Student Aspirations Note: Respondents may indicate more than one goal. Students’ Goals Indicate which of the following are your reasons/goals for attending this college. SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  22. Student Persistence Barriers to Returning to College How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college? SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  23. The Center describes four key strategies to promote strengthened classroom experiences: Strengthen classroom engagement Integrate student support into learning experiences Focus institutional policies on creating the conditions for learning Expand professional development focused on engaging students Strategies to Promote Learning that Matters

  24. Strengthen Classroom Engagement 1. Raise Expectations Students work hard to meet instructors’ expectations: 56.6% of students “Often” or “Very Often” work harder than they thought they could to meet an instructor’s standards or expectations 38% of students report spending five or fewer hours per week preparing for class SPC Board of Trustees Meeting

  25. Strengthen Classroom Engagement Percentage of students responding never 2. Promote Active, Engaged Learning In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the using activities? SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  26. Strengthen Classroom Engagement 3. Ensure that Students Know Where They Stand During the current school year, how often have you received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance? SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  27. Integrate Student Support into Learning Experiences How often do you use the services? How important are the services? Student Use and Value of Student Services SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  28. Focus Institutional Policies on Creating the Conditions for Learning Class Attendance During the current school year, how often have you skipped class? SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCSSE data

  29. Expand Professional Development Focused on Engaging Students Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning (CETL) – Offering on-going professional development sessions for fulltime and part-time faculty Expanded SPD funding for faculty $1500/faculty member over a two-year period All College Professional Development Day SPC Board of Trustees Meeting Source: 2011 CCFSSE data

  30. Questions…

More Related