SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Origins of Fair Play

rosalindd avatar
35 diapositives · 394 Views · Jan 02, 2020

Origins of Fair Play. Ken Binmore k.binmore@ucl.ac.uk. John Mackie’s Inventing Right and Wrong. Metaphysical moral philosophy is unsound. Look instead at: Anthropology Game theory. Social Contracts.

Origins of Fair Play - slide 1
01 / 35Origins of Fair Play
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Origins of Fair Play
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Origins ofFair Play Ken Binmore k.binmore@ucl.ac.uk

  2. John Mackie’sInventing Right and Wrong Metaphysical moral philosophy is unsound. Look instead at: Anthropology Game theory

  3. Social Contracts The social contracts of pure hunter-gatherer societies have two universal properties: No bosses Fair division

  4. Pure hunter-gatherers

  5. Toy games Adam’s strategies dove dove hawk hawk Prisoners’ Dilemma Stag Hunt

  6. Toy games Eve’s strategies dove hawk dove hawk Prisoners’ Dilemma Stag Hunt

  7. Toy games Adam’s payoffs dove hawk dove hawk dove dove 4 2 0 0 hawk hawk 3 3 1 2 Prisoners’ Dilemma Stag Hunt

  8. Toy games Eve’s payoffs dove hawk dove hawk 2 3 4 3 dove dove 0 1 0 2 hawk hawk Prisoners’ Dilemma Stag Hunt

  9. Toy games dove hawk dove hawk 2 3 4 3 dove dove 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 2 hawk hawk 2 3 1 3 Prisoners’ Dilemma Stag Hunt

  10. Nash Equilibria dove hawk dove hawk 2 3 4 3 dove dove 2 0 0 4 0 0 1 2 hawk hawk 3 3 1 2 Prisoners’ Dilemma Stag Hunt

  11. Coordination Games left right box ball 0 1 1 0 left box 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 2 right ball 0 0 1 1 Battle of the Sexes Driving Game

  12. Reciprocal Altruism 2 3 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 2 0 2 0 3 1 3 1 2 0 0 1 3 1 indefinitely repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma 3 0 1 1 3 1

  13. Reciprocal Altruism d 2 3 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 3 d h h 1 0 3 1 2 0 2 0 3 1 3 1 2 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 1 1 Grim strategy 3 1

  14. Reputation and Trust Sure I trust him. You know the onesto trust in this business. The oneswho betray you, bye-bye.

  15. Vampire bats share blood on a reciprocal basis to insure each other against hunger.

  16. Folk Theorem Eve’spayoff efficientequilibria currentstatus quo 0 Adam’spayoff

  17. Equilibrium selection Fairness is evolution’s solution tothe equilibrium selection problem.

  18. Equilibrium selection Fairness is evolution’s solution tothe equilibrium selection problem. Fairness therefore evolved as a means of balancing power---not as a substitute for power.

  19. Deep structure of fairness norms As with language, fairness has adeep structure that is universal in the human species. This deep structure is embodied in Rawls’ original position

  20. John Rawls’ original position Veil of ignorance Comparison of welfare Enforcement

  21. I might be Adam and Oskar might be Eve. Or Oskar might be Adam and I might be Eve Adam Eve Original Position Oskar John

  22. implicit insurancecontracts implicit insurancecontracts deep structure of fairness?

  23. implicit insurancecontracts deep structure of fairness? original position original position

  24. implicit insurancecontracts Who is right? original position externalenforcement self-policing utilitarianism egalitarianism Harsanyi Rawls

  25. Modern Equity Theory What is fair … is what is proportional. Aristotle Eve slope is ratio of the players’context-dependentsocial indices status quo Adam 0

  26. implicit insurancecontracts original position cultural evolution externalenforcement self-policing utilitarianism egalitarianism standard ofinterpersonal comparison

  27. Utilitarianism and Egalitarianism Eve’spayoff utilitarian outcome egalitarian outcome . state of nature . . Adam’spayoff 0 The slopes are determined by the standard of interpersonal comparison.

  28. Utilitarianism and Egalitarianism Eve’spayoff utilitarian outcome egalitarian outcome . . . Adam’spayoff 0 The slopes are determined by the standard of interpersonal comparison.

  29. Utilitarianism and Egalitarianism Eve’spayoff utilitarian outcome egalitarian outcome . . Adam’spayoff 0 The slopes are determined by the standard of interpersonal comparison.

  30. Utilitarianism and Egalitarianism Nash bargaining solution . . 0 The slopes are determined by the standard of interpersonal comparison.

  31. Cultural Evolution: Egalitarian Case Nash bargaining solution . egalitarian solution . . 0 short-run present medium-run past

  32. Analogy with language Chomsky discovered that all languages have a deep structure which is universal in the human species, but the particular language spoken in a society is determined by its cultural history. Fairness norms similarly have a common deepstructure, but the standard of interpersonal comparison that is necessary as an input to theoriginal position is culturally determined.

  33. Moral relativism • Need • Ability • Effort • Status Social indices always respond to these parameters in the same way, but the degree of response varies with a society’s cultural history.

  34. Reform?