Understanding X-Bar Theory: A Comprehensive Overview of Syntax in Linguistics
This lecture series delves into X-Bar Theory, elaborating on its key components, including the rules for introducing complements, specifiers, and adjuncts. It begins with foundational concepts outlined in the initial lectures, then progresses to analysis of determiner phrases (DP), verb positions, and movement within clauses. The complexities of subjects, non-finite clause subjects, and the complementiser system are explored, offering insights into their roles in syntax. This comprehensive overview is essential for students and linguists aiming to grasp syntactic structures and theories.
Understanding X-Bar Theory: A Comprehensive Overview of Syntax in Linguistics
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Syntax Lecture 13: Revision
Lecture 1: X-bar Theory • X-bar rules for introducing: • Complement • (X1 X0 Y2) • Specifier • (X2 Y2 X1) • Adjunct • (Xn Xn, Ym)if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise
Lecture 1: X-bar Theory • X-bar rules for introducing: • Complement • (X’ X YP) • Specifier • (XP YP X’) • Adjunct • (Xn Xn, Ym)if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise
Lecture 1: X-bar Theory • X-bar rules for introducing: • Complement • (X’ X YP) • Specifier • (XP YP X’) • Adjunct • (Xn Xn, Ym)if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise
Lecture 1: X-bar Theory • X-bar rules for introducing: • Complement • (X’ X YP) • Specifier • (XP YP X’) • Adjunct • (Xn Xn, Ym)if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise Adjunction to XP: adjunct = YP (Y2)
Lecture 1: X-bar Theory • X-bar rules for introducing: • Complement • (X’ X YP) • Specifier • (XP YP X’) • Adjunct • (Xn Xn, Ym)if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise Adjunction to X’: adjunct = YP
Lecture 1: X-bar Theory • X-bar rules for introducing: • Complement • (X’ X YP) • Specifier • (XP YP X’) • Adjunct • (Xn Xn, Ym)if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise Adjunction to X: adjunct = Y
Lecture 1: X-bar Theory • DP analysis: an example • Determiner is the head of the nominal phrase • NP is complement • Possessor is specifier
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation • Binary features • [±F] functional vs. thematic • [±N] nounlike vs. not nounlike • [±V] verblike vs. not verblike
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation • [-F] categories • [+N, -V] noun N • [-N, +V] verb V • [+N, +V] adjective/adverb A • [-N, -V] preposition P • [+F] categories • [+N, -V] determiner D • [-N, +V] inflection I • [+N, +V] degree adverb Deg • [-N, -V] complementiser C
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation • Subcategories of [-F] categories determine what arguments a head selects • DP, PP, CP, , etc. • E.g. • write [DP a letter] • smile • fact [CP that the world is round] • out [PP from the cupboard] • certain [CP that I am right]
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation • All [+F] categories have only one type of complement: • D – NP • I – VP • C – IP • Deg – AP
Lecture 3: The Subject • The subject is odd • It can be an argument of the verb • But it isn’t in the VP • It can be meaningless • It can be underlyingly empty and moved into • E.g. passive
Lecture 3: The Subject • We also find VPs with subjects • He made [VP the ice melt] • So there are two subject positions – but only one subject
Lecture 3: The Subject • Solution • Subject originates inside VP • D-structure • Moves to specifier of IP • S-structure
Lecture 4: The complementiser system • The complementiser heads a CP • Different forces • Declarative (that/for) • Interrogative (if) • The IP is its complement • Different complements • Finite (that/if) • Infinitive (for) • Wh-phrases move to its specifier
Lecture 5:Wh-movement • Wh-phrases move for semantic reasons • A CP with a wh-phrase in spec is interrogative • A CP without a wh-phrase in spec (and no interrogative head) is declarative • But not all wh-clauses are interrogative • Relative clauses involve wh-movement • The relative wh-phrase moves to enable to clause to be interpreted as a modifier • So, all wh-movement is semantically motivated
Lecture 5:Wh-movement • Restrictive relative clauses • Wh-relative • The man [CP who you dislike] • that-relative • The man [CP that you dislike] • zero relative • The man [CP you dislike] • All involve wh-movement • The wh-phrase is covert in that and zero relatives
Lecture 6: non-finite clause subjects • There are two types of infinitival clause which appear to lack a subject • John seems [ -- to be rich] • John wants [ -- to be rich] • They look the same, but they are not.
Lecture 6: non-finite clause subjects • Raising verbs • lack their own subjects • can take infinitival complements, • the subject moves to the subject of the raising verb
Lecture 6: non-finite clause subjects • Control verbs • have their own subjects • can take infinitival complements, • the subject is a covert pronoun which refers to the subject of the control verb
Lecture 7: Verb positions • They are in V when • I is a free morpheme • I is a bound morpheme, but the verb cannot move • In negative contexts • In inversion contexts where the subject stays in spec IP • They are in I when • I is a bound morpheme and the verb can move • They are in C when • I is a bound morpheme • I to C movement (inversion) is necessary • The subject moves to spec CP
Lecture 7: Verb positions • When a verb moves to support a bound morpheme, it adjoins to the morpheme
Lecture 8: Verb types 1 • Causatives • They made the ice melt • Overt free causative verb • Lexical verb does not move • They melted the ice • Covert bound causative verb • lexical verb moves to support it
Lecture 8: Verb types 1 • Transitives • John may throw Bill • Theme is specifier of throw • Agent is specifier of covert bound agentive verb (= do) • Lexical verb moves to support agentive verb • Agent moves to subject position • Passives • Bill may be thrown • Theme is specifier of throw • Passive morpheme replaces agentive verb, so no agent • Lexical verb moves to support passive morpheme • Theme moves to subject position
Lecture 9: verb types 2 • Unergative verbs • Take cognate objects • Can’t appear in there and locative inversion constructions • Have an agent argument
Lecture 9: verb types 2 • Unaccusative verbs • Can’t take a cognate object • Can appear in there and locative inversion structures • Have a theme argument
Lecture 10: auxiliary verbs • The aspectual morphemes (-ing, -en) are heads of VPs • Main verbs can support only one overt bound morpheme • All other morphemes have to be supported by a dummy auxiliary (do, have and be) • Do is used when the following verbal head is a thematic verb • Have is used when the following head is perfect (-en) • Be is used in all other cases
Lecture 11: the DP • Empty determiners with proper nouns and bare plurals • [DP John], [DP men] • Post determiners are APs in specifier of NP • [DP the [NP [AP very few] complaints] • Pre-determiners are determiners preceding an abstract ‘group noun’ for which of does not have to appear • [DP all [NP members of [DP the committee]]] • [DP all [NP (of) [DP the crowd]]]
Lecture 12: adjectival phrases • Adjectival phrases are headed by a degree adverb (so they are DegPs) • DegPs have measure phrases in their specifiers and APs in their complements • [DegP [two sandwiches] [Deg’ too [AP short of a picnic]]] • APs have extent phrases (very) in their specifiers and PPs, CPs or nothing in their complements • So [AP very [A’ small [PP for a giant]]] • Deg can be free (too, as, so, etc.) or bound (-er, -est) • In the latter case the adjective moves to bind the Deg
Answers • 1 = b • 2 = d • 3 = b • 4 = a • 5 = c • 6 = d • 7 = a • 8 = c • 9 = a • 10 = b • 11 = c • 12 = a • 0-6 = 1 • 7 = 2 • 8 = 3 • 9-10 = 4 • 11-12 = 5