1 / 3

HW II – AE 6070 GA TECH

HW II – AE 6070 GA TECH. Michael Duffy September 27 th , 2006. Rotor Inflow Distribution. *Note the HW called for Momentum theory, however, I show the same results using BET (w/uniform inflow). Blade Element Theory (Empirical), K=1.1. Blade Element Theory (Ideal), K=1.0. λ , Inflow.

rosina
Télécharger la présentation

HW II – AE 6070 GA TECH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HW II – AE 6070GA TECH Michael Duffy September 27th, 2006

  2. Rotor Inflow Distribution *Note the HW called for Momentum theory, however, I show the same results using BET (w/uniform inflow) Blade Element Theory (Empirical), K=1.1 Blade Element Theory (Ideal), K=1.0 λ, Inflow Assumptions • Ct = 0.008 • Cl = 5.7 a, Cd = 0.0087 – 0.02167 a + 0.4 a2 • s= 0.1 • tw = -8 degrees • B = 0.97 • k = 1.1 • Cutout = 7% • Cdo = 0.01 (for simple performance estimate) • a = 5.7 (per radian) Blade Element Theory (no twist) Blade Element Theory (Twisted) x = r/R * Note All data is provided in .xls file attached

  3. Cp/Sigma vs. Ct/Sigma *Note I take a slightly different approach then the HW calls for. First I use BEMT for all curves except the Simple Curve. To simulate BET, I just adjust the twist to allow for uniform inflow. I also do not use the B factor for tip loss, rather I use the Prandtl tip loss factor which is dependent on the number of blades and thrust setting. Finally, I vary pitch to get different thrust settings and thus different Cp and Ct curves rather then varying sigma. I keep sigma fixed at ~0.1. Please keep this in mind when comparing to the curves given in the hw example. Simple Moment Theory BET w/no losses and uniform inflow BEMT no tip losses BEMT w/Prandtl tip losses Cp/Sigma Assumptions • Ct = 0.008 • Cl = 5.7 a, Cd = 0.0087 – 0.02167 a + 0.4 a2 • s= 0.1 • tw = -8 degrees • B = 0.97 • k = 1.1 • Cutout = 7% • Cdo = 0.01 (for simple performance estimate) • a = 5.7 (per radian) Ct/Sigma * Note All data is provided in .xls file attached

More Related