1 / 24

An Overview of the NCI SBIR Program

An Overview of the NCI SBIR Program. Michael Weingarten Director, NCI SBIR Development Center. July 28, 2008. Why are SBIR and STTR Important?. NIH’s primary resource for enabling commercialization of innovative, high impact-technologies, such as: Research tools Medical devices

Télécharger la présentation

An Overview of the NCI SBIR Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Overview of the NCI SBIR Program Michael Weingarten Director, NCI SBIR Development Center July 28, 2008

  2. Why are SBIR and STTR Important? • NIH’s primary resource for enabling commercialization of innovative, high impact-technologies, such as: • Research tools • Medical devices • Therapeutics • Provides incentive to academic investigators to translate technology (new company formation) • One of the largest sources of early stage life sciences financing in the country • Provides early stage funding of novel drugs and devices that show promise in the fight against cancer. • A $100 million program at the NCI 2

  3. Why are SBIR and STTR Important? • Venture capital and angel investors are moving to fund later stage technology development to reduce their risk and increase return. • Often don’t invest in a device until a prototype is available and pre-clinical or clinical data indicates safety and efficacy. • Without SBIR funding, many critical new technologies would never be made available for widespread clinical use. • Ultimately, the goal is to accelerate the application of promising novel cancer therapies and technologies for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer in patients. 3

  4. SBIR Program Enhancements • Co-invest With the Private Sector to Bridge SBIR Projects Toward Commercialization • Establish NCI SBIR Development Center • Focus Solicitations on Commercially Viable Technologies 4

  5. EnhancementCo-invest With the PrivateSector to Bridge SBIR Projects Toward Commercialization 5

  6. Phase II SBIR andCommercialization Success • Significant resources are required for getting through the FDA approval process • This funding gap is known as the “Valley of Death” Today, many awardees complete the SBIR Phase II award without advancing the technology far enough to attract private investment 6

  7. SBIR Phase II Bridge Award Follow-On Award to the SBIR Phase II Award Goal is to help early-stage companies cross the “Valley of Death” by: Helping to facilitate partnerships with third party investors/strategic partners Incentivizing partnerships earlier in the development process by sharing in the investment risk The Bridge Award is modeled after NSF’s “Phase IIB Option” and has the same key feature: • SBIR company is expected to raise third-party funds. Competitive preference & funding priority will be given to applicants who do so. 7

  8. Phase II Bridge Pilot at NCI • Third-party funds may include: • Cash, liquid assets, convertible debt • Sources of third-party funds may include: • Another company, venture capital firm, individual “angel” investor, foundation, university, state or local government, or any combination • Third-party funds are expected to equal or exceed NCI funds being requested Third-party investors are expected to bring: • Rigorous commercialization due diligence • Commercialization guidance during the award • Additional financing beyond the minimum third-party requirement 8

  9. Award focuses on cancer therapeutics and cancer imaging $1 MM (NCI SBIR set-aside dollars) per year for ≤ 3 years Development efforts must be predicated on a previous SBIR Phase II grant and may include: Pre-clinical R&D needed for regulatory filings (e.g. IND or IDE) Clinical trials Application Dates: September 19, 2008 and February 27, 2009 NCI intends to commit up to $10M in FY 2009 to Bridge Awards Open to current and recently expired NIH SBIR Phase II projects Phase II Bridge Pilot at NCIRFA-CA-08-021 9

  10. Example: How the Bridge Award Would Apply in the Area of Drug Development Phase I & Phase II SBIR The “Valley of Death” is the problem Preclinical Development (Lead Development, Animal Studies, File IND) Target Identification & Validation Safety Review Clinical Trials NDA Review Commercialization Private Investment 10

  11. Example: How the Bridge Award Would Apply in the Area of Drug Development Phase I & Phase II SBIR Preclinical Development (Lead Development, Animal Studies, File IND) Target Identification & Validation Safety Review Clinical Trials NDA Review Commercialization SBIR Bridge Award Private Investment SBIR Bridge Award addresses the problem by bridging the “Valley of Death” SBIR Bridge Awardallows NIH to share investment risk by incentivizing investors or strategic partners to evaluate projects and commit funds much earlier 11

  12. Milestone-Based Awards SBIR Bridge Award STOP STOP 2nd Year 1/3 of funds 1st Year 1/3 of funds 3rd Year 1/3 of funds YES YES • Milestones reached? • Third-party funds? • Milestones reached? • Third-party funds? • Milestones reached? • Third-party funds? NO NO Preclinical Development (Lead Development, Animal Studies, File IND) Target Identification & Validation Safety Review Clinical Trials NDA Review Commercialization Phase I & Phase II SBIR Private Investment / Strategic Partner SBIR Bridge Award 12

  13. Why should we expect this to work? Phase IIB: 10-Year Track Record of Success at NSF • In FY 06, NSF invested $18M in Phase IIB companies that in turn raised $58M in third-party funds • Recent data show that five years after beginning the Phase II SBIR award: • Phase IIB awardees have commercialization success rate = 70% • Companies that don’t receive a Phase IIB have a success rate = 30% 13

  14. EnhancementEstablish an NCI SBIRDevelopment Center to Optimally Manage the Program 14

  15. Development Center Goals • Assemble the scientific and business expertise needed to optimally manage the SBIR program • Integrate all SBIR initiatives with NCI’s program priorities • Foster collaborations with other Institutes at NIH which share common technology needs • Offer services on a reimbursable basis • Increase the return on investment for the SBIR program 15

  16. Key Activities and Metrics Center Activities Near-term Metrics (1-3 years) • Market the program to attract the best companies • Relationship building with stakeholders • Active management of projects and better oversight • Improvement Over Previous Rounds • Number and quality of proposals received • Achievement of technical and commercial milestones • Number of Phase I awardees who successfully compete for a Phase II award Long-term Metrics (3-5 years) • Facilitate success through mentorship • Create investor networks focused on commercializing cancer technologies • Examine correlations between activities and outcomes; fine tune the program • Innovation Metrics • Invention disclosures, patents, publications • Commercialization Metrics • Number of products impacting the cancer community, cumulative sales, license agreements • FDA approvals for marketing • Company sold or merged, acquisition of outside capital 16

  17. EnhancementFocus Solicitations on Commercially Viable Technologies 17

  18. NCI is Moving to More Focused Solicitations Goal is to improve commercialization success by: • Investing in technology priorities of NCI that also have the greatest potential for commercialization • Catalyzing targeted technology development and drawing private sector investment in key areas (e.g., therapeutics) Benefits • Ability to manage the awardee’s progress toward specific milestones and the development of a product

  19. Examples of NCI SBIR Technology Priorities • To support the investigation of candidate therapeutic agents to establish the rationale for continued development to the point of filing an IND • Compounds may be chosen from a list provided by NCI or by the small business Nanotechnology Imaging and Sensing Platforms for Improved Diagnosis of Cancer • To support the development of nano-enabled platforms for early detection and/or imaging, or for post-treatment monitoring to detect recurrence of disease • Goal is to enhance clinical diagnosis of cancer Development of Anti-Cancer Agents Biomarker Development for Early Detection & Diagnosis of Cancer • To support the development of high-throughput antibody arrays for the quantitative analysis of multiple biomarkers • Goal is to provide new tools for the early detection and diagnosis of cancer Biopsy Instruments and Devices that Preserve Molecular Profiles in Tumors • To support the development of devices with potential for stabilizing the molecular profile of cancerous lesions in visceral tissue sites during clinical biopsy procedures • To improve the accuracy of biomarker assessment for diagnosis and prognosis

  20. Success Stories 20

  21. Success Stories Naviscan (San Diego, Calif.) PEM Flex™ PET Scanner has unprecedented 2 mm imaging capability enabling detection of the earliest stages of breast cancer (in situ) and tumors less than 2 millimeters in size with very high accuracy and sensitivity (93%). This cannot be achieved by any other modality, including MRI and is important for early detection. • Highlights • SBIR funding received from 1994-2005 • FDA-Cleared in July 2003 • Venture-backed capital received in 2005 • 40 Employees Tomographic PEM 21

  22. Success Stories Xenogen and Spectros Dr. Benaron has founded five optical imaging systems companies since 1986. Three companies that received NCI SBIR funding succeeded; two that did not, failed. Xenogen’s In Vivo Imaging System and Spectros T-Stat ischemia detection device have both achieved success. • Highlights • Xenogen sold for $80 million to Caliper Life Sciences in 2006; remains a leader in drug discovery/research optical molecular imaging systems • Spectros T-Stat first device approved by U.S. FDA for ischemia detection. Spectros T-Stat Monitoring Infant 22

  23. Success Stories NovaRx (San Diego, Calif.) Patented vaccine technology that blocks the effects of TGF-β so that the vaccine is more potent in amplifying the immune system’s ability to destroy cancerous cells. As compared to current approved therapies, Lucanix™(lung cancer vaccine) shows dramatic increase in median survival time (581 days vs. 240 days) and 2-year survival rates (47% vs. < 20%). It has received fast-track status from the FDA to accelerate the speed to which this promising vaccine reaches patients. Pre-Therapy • Highlights • SBIR funding received from 2002 through 2010 • 2 Phase III clinical trials (lung cancer and glioma) • Venture capital raised matches SBIR funding • Additional vaccines for other tumor sites are being explored and show great promise. Post-Therapy 23

  24. http://sbir.cancer.gov For More Information Michael Weingarten Director NCI SBIR Development Center Phone: 301-496-4413 weingartenm@mail.nih.gov 24

More Related