1 / 29

Hideyuki Morimoto Columbia University Libraries

Council on East Asian Libraries Special Committee to Study Proposal for Comprehensive Review of LCSH/NAR/SAR Entries for East Asian Studies Materials : Its Findings, Recommendation, and Beyond. Hideyuki Morimoto Columbia University Libraries. Introduction.

roz
Télécharger la présentation

Hideyuki Morimoto Columbia University Libraries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Council on East Asian Libraries Special Committee to Study Proposal for Comprehensive Review of LCSH/NAR/SAR Entries for East Asian Studies Materials : Its Findings, Recommendation, and Beyond Hideyuki Morimoto Columbia University Libraries

  2. Introduction • Mar. 2004-summer 2005: CEAL Special Committee to Study Proposal for Comprehensive Review of LCSH/NAR/SAR Entries for East Asian Studies Materials • highlight of Special Committee work and future possibility

  3. Background • spring 2003: communication between Dr. Eugene W. Wu and Dr. Tai-loi Ma sent to CEAL • summer 2003: Committee on Technical Processing submitted interoffice memorandum to CEAL President

  4. Background--cont. • spring 2004: Executive Board discussed the Dr. Wu-Dr. Ma proposal, with wide ranging views expressed; EB established Special Committee to Study Proposal for Comprehensive Review of LCSH/NAR/SAR Entries for East Asian Studies Materials

  5. Membership Special Member: Tai-loi Ma Ex Officio: Abraham J. Yu Members: Erica S. Chang Su Chen Shuyong Jiang Dawn Lawson Hideyuki Morimoto (chair)

  6. Procedures • Pilot study of reviewing sampled parts of the LC/SACO and LC/NACO Authority Files • Survey of CEAL members, as to their view and availability for a production-mode project

  7. Pilot Study--Literature Review • Eugene W. Wu (1996) • three LC reports • two RLG reports

  8. Pilot Study--Assumptions • Full MARC records needed to be examined. • Without extensive programming and access to the full files set as a whole for manipulation, no a priori extraction of relevant LCSHs/NARs/SARs was conceivable at a tolerable efficiency score (recall + specificity - 1).

  9. Pilot Study--Methodology/Operationalisation • N = 1,100 (p < .05) • randomly selected LCCNs (supplementary random sample of 220 OCLC ARNs) • detailed coding specifications with operational definitions for pilot study participants to follow • Dr. Ma's review of East Asian studies-related headings

  10. Pilot Study--Estimated Total # of Authority Records • LCSHs est.252,252 records • NARs/SARs est.4,778,259 records • LCSHs intrinsically related to E.Asian studies est.7,568 records • NARs/SARs intrinsically related to E.Asian st. est.286,696 records

  11. Pilot Study--Estimated Total Person-Hours • Estimated total person-hours for systematically retrieving and going through LCSH/NAR/SAR entries • LCCN approach: 288,415.96 person-hours • OCLC ARN approach: 82,357.82 person-hours

  12. Pilot Study--Estimated Total # of Inappropriate Entries • LCSHs inconclusive • NARs/SARs • Chinese: inappr.rate9 % --> 12,901 records • Japanese: inappr.rate23 % --> 21,980 records • Korean; East Asian as a whole: inappr.rate 0 % --> 0 record

  13. Pilot Study--Inappropriateness Observed • split file for the same individual without involvement of multiple bibliographic identity e.g., Saito, Hirosi, ╪d 1886-1939 (n 88156458 ) vs. Saito¯, Hiroshi, ╪d 1886-1939 (nr2004017191)

  14. Pilot Study--Inappropriateness Observed--cont. • record incompleteness e.g., Sakauchi-mura (Japan) (nr 90018748 ): name change to Ibigawa-cho¯ (Japan) not reflected

  15. Pilot Study--Inappropriateness Observed--cont. • incompleteness in cross reference evaluation e.g., Awaji pottery (sh 85010572 ): 008/29:b (x-refs.: Mimpei pottery; etc.)

  16. Pilot Study--Inappropriateness Observed--cont. • heading formulation irregularity • punctuation irregularity e.g., Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan. ╪b So¯mubu. ╪b Bo¯saika (n 78014947 ) inconsistent with hdg. for the parent government body: Sumida-ku (Tokyo, Japan) (n 81084410 )

  17. Pilot Study--Inappropriateness Observed--cont. • use of superseded cataloguing rules e.g., Nihon Tokushu Kyo¯iku Gakkai (n 79016121 ): 008/10:b

  18. Survey--Literature Review • five CEAL-related reports

  19. Survey--Assumptions • CEAL members interested in Dr. Wu-Dr. Ma proposal and/or issue of LCSHs/NARs/SARs for East Asian studies would take time to respond to a survey. • Web-based survey questionnaire should not be a deterrent to a response rate.

  20. Survey--Methodology/Operationalisation • ten questions re opinion and availability indication for production-mode project participation • web-based survey form • availability of survey form announced through Eastlib • unit of analysis: each CEAL member

  21. Survey--CEAL Member Opinion

  22. Survey--CEAL Member Availability

  23. Survey--Mechanical Situation

  24. Recommendations • comprehensive review of LCSHs/NARs/SARs for East Asian studies rather unfeasible within 7,020 person-hours of participation by CEAL members • CEAL members should continue with incremental improvement, on an as-encountered basis, of LCSHs/NARs/SARs

  25. Recommendations--cont. • alternative recommendation, if CEAL would still decide to undertake comprehensive review • exploring possibility of cooperation of non-CEAL members • exploring possibility of fund-raising to cover expenses for automatic identification of East Asian studies-related LCSHs/NARs/SARs

  26. Communication with Proposal Originators • Dr. Wu's reaction to Special Committee's final report • Special Committee's response to Dr. Wu

  27. Possibility of Future Collaborative Work • collaborative work with JULAC/BSC? • expansion of participants base in continued incremental improvement on an as-encountered basis: PCC participants outside CEAL membership, esp. HkUST cataloguers • PCC CJK Funnel Project: non-HkUST JULAC cataloguers (in addition to CEAL members currently outside PCC)

  28. Conclusion • background • charges • membership • functions/organisations/procedures • LCSH/NAR/SAR sample record review project • survey of CEAL members • recommendations

  29. Conclusion--cont. • communication with proposal originators • possibility of future collaborative work

More Related