1 / 50

A dvanced Design Rules For Opti ma l D ynamic Properties Of A dditive M anufacturing Products

A dvanced Design Rules For Opti ma l D ynamic Properties Of A dditive M anufacturing Products. Zlatan Šoškić Faculty of Mechanical and Civil Engineering in Kraljevo University of Kragujevac soskic.z@mfkv.rs. Content. We want to make you apply for the very next MSCA call About us Why H2020?

rroberts
Télécharger la présentation

A dvanced Design Rules For Opti ma l D ynamic Properties Of A dditive M anufacturing Products

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Advanced Design RulesFor Optimal Dynamic PropertiesOf Additive Manufacturing Products Zlatan ŠoškićFaculty of Mechanical and Civil Engineering in KraljevoUniversity of Kragujevacsoskic.z@mfkv.rs From association to participation

  2. Content • We want to make you apply for the very next MSCA call • About us • Why H2020? • Why RISE? • Our project proposal • Some advices

  3. Not because we are great, but exactly the opposite... Who we are?

  4. Who we are • The Faculty of Mechanical and Civil Engineering in Kraljevo • The University of Kragujevac

  5. Who we are • Horizon 2020 • RISE-2016: A_MADAM – coordinator • FoF-2014: FoFAM – individual regional expert • FP7 • REGPOT-2007: SeRViCe – coordinator • SST-2007: TransBonus – partner • FP6 • 2002-TRANSPORT-2: RRTC – partner • EU supported RSDP2, CBC, CEEPUS, Erasmus+ ...

  6. Who we are • Total EU funds ≈ 3,5 M€

  7. Who we are • 3D Impulse

  8. How did we did it? Our project proposal

  9. 2012-FP7-IAPP • January 2012... • FP7 Industria-Academia-Partnerships and Pathways • „Inter-sectoral and inter-national“ secondments • Research program • Consortium of both academic partners and SMEs • 100% funded by EU • 19 April 2012 at 17.00.00

  10. 2012-FP7-IAPP 1) Secondments • We met them and we liked them! • REGPOT-2007-1 „SeRViCe“ • 1 M€ budget • 180,000 € for secondments • 3x6 months with University of Bologna /Italy/ • 1x12 months with KTH University Stockholm /Sweden/ • 38,000 € for personnel costs of 12-man team for three long years

  11. 2012-FP7-IAPP 2) Research program with academic and SME partners • We had it! • REGPOT-2007-1 „SeRViCe“ • Railway industry in Serbia broke in period 2008-2012 • Secondments in Bologna brought a new child... • „IMPulse“ • 2011-2013 • Establishment of research center for support to SMEs • 1 M€ • Built on experience of collaboration between University of Bolognaand SME „Studio Pedrini“ from Bologna • Supported by SME „Topomatika“ from Zagreb /Croatia/

  12. 2012-FP7-IAPP 2) Research program with academic and SME partners • Additive manufacturing (AM) • „3D printing“ • „No-man“ manufacturing • „No-tools“ manufacturing • „Rapid“ manufacturing

  13. 2012-FP7-IAPP 2) Research plan with academic and SME partners • Selective laser sintering (SLS) • Polymers • Metals and alloys

  14. 2012-FP7-IAPP 2) Research plan with academic and SME partners • Problem • AM is still seldom used by industrial and mechanical designers • Research not aimed at needs of engineers • Scientific publications • Engineers use „design rules“ • Solution • Research for industrial and mechanical designers • Establish a comprehensive set of of design rules for AM • Static mechanical behaviour • Dynamic mechanical behaviour (fatigue, impact)

  15. 2012-FP7-IAPP 3) Consortium • We had a part... • REGPOT-2007-1 „SeRViCe“ • DIEM – University of Bologna /Italy/ • TEMPUS project JEP-40069 „Multidisciplinary Studies of Design in Mechanical Engineering“ (2006-2008) • YSESM 2005, Forli /Italy/ • IMPuls • Topomatika, Zagreb /Croatia/

  16. 2012-FP7-IAPP 3) Consortium • We missed an industrial partner... • The largest EU manufacturer of AM machines

  17. 2012-FP7-IAPP • Advanced Design Rules for Additive Manufacturing by SLS • ADAM-SLS • We did not expected it to be approved • „SeRViCe“ was not approved first time • We expected to improve it for the last FP7 call • It was not meant to happen... • Ready 17 April 2012 around 4pm • 19 April 2012 at 17.01.45...not submitted-CALL CLOSED

  18. 2013-FP7-IAPP • …December 2012 • Last FP7-IAPP call • 16January 2013 at 17.00.00 • ADAM-SLS was ready... • ...except that EOS opted out of the consortium around Christmas

  19. 2013-FP7-IAPP • …December 2012 • Last FP7-IAPP call • 16January 2013 at 17.00.00 • ADAM-SLS was ready... • ...except that EOS opted out of the consortium around Christmas

  20. 2013-FP7-IAPP • ADAM-SLS consortium • REGPOT-2007-1 „SeRViCe“ • DIEM - University of Bologna /Italy/ • Studio Pedrini, Bologna /Italy/ • IMPuls • Topomatika, Zagreb /Croatia/ • MTTC, Gračanica /Bosnia & Herzegovina/

  21. 2013-FP7-IAPP • Submitted 16. January 2014. 10:41:43 • Re-submitted 16. January 2014. 16:47:51 • without budget in Part A • Evaluation results available on 9. April 2014. • Evaluation result: 72.70% (threshold 70%) • S&T quality 3.80/5.00 (threshold 3.00) • Transfer of knowledge 4.00/5.00 (threshold 3.00) • Implementation 2.80/5.00 (threshold 3.00) • Impact 3.70/5.00 (threshold 3.00)

  22. 2013-FP7-IAPP • FP7 and IAPP were over…

  23. RISE-2015 • January 2015... • RISE • „Inter-sectoral and inter-national“ secondments • Research program • Consortium of both academic partners and SMEs • 100% funded by EU • RISE is just IAPP disguised ! • 28 April 2015 at 17.00.00

  24. RISE-2015

  25. RISE-2015 • Detailed plan of improving proposal on the basis of ESR • Goal 85/100 • Improving implementation • Acquiring complimentary skills • Demarcation of management rights/responsibilities • Outreach plan • Dissemination plan • Communication plan • Intellectual property rights • The chief advisor: Part B of IAPP project Mr.SymBioMath – available to public

  26. RISE-2015 • Improving capacity of the consortium ?! • FMCE Kraljevo – University of Kragujevac /Serbia/ • DIN – University of Bologna /Italy/ • Topomatika, Zagreb /Croatia/ • Studio Pedrini, Bologna /Italy/ • Plamingo, Gračanica /Bosnia & Herzegovina/ • Acronym A_MADAM?!

  27. RISE-2015 • Submitted 28. April 2015. 16:41:00 • Re-submitted 28. April 2015. 16:53:00 • Evaluation results available on 21. August 2015. • Evaluation result: 57.60% (threshold 70%) • Excellence 2.80/5.00(threshold 3.00) • Implementation 3.20/5.00 (threshold 3.00) • Impact 2.80/5.00 (threshold 3.00)

  28. RISE-2015 post mortem • What went wrong? • How good marks turned bad? • ESR • No clear deficiencies (not sufficiently, not convincingly ...) • Reviewers did not liked the proposal • They did not think it had sufficient S&T quality • What to do • Do nothing?! • Lobby in Brussels?!

  29. RISE-2015 post mortem • Vojvodina Metal Cluster • FoFAM project • H2020 project • “Industrial and regional valorization of FoF Additive Manufacturing Projects” • AM experts • Top EU experts • Regional experts • Education for AM – cross-cutting issue • Standardization in AM – cross/cutting issue • Design rules for AM on priority list

  30. RISE-2016 • October 2015 with deadline 28. April 2016. • Revised „Excellence“ • Reference to FoFAM project conclusions • Design rules • Standardization • Education • References to our fresh research results • Revised CV of Project Coordinator • Reference to participation in FoFAM • New abbreviation A_madaM • New title „Advanced Design Rules for Optimal Dynamic Properties of Additive Manufacturing Products“

  31. RISE-2016 • Submitted 27. April 2016 16:12:40 • Re-submitted 28. April 2016 16:58:06

  32. RISE-2016 • 2 September 2016...

  33. RISE-2016 • What is approved? • Work breakdown structure

  34. RISE-2016 • What is approved? • Work breakdown structure Table B1: Work Package List

  35. RISE-2016 • What is approved? • The concept of the konwledge exchange • „Breadth for depth“

  36. RISE-2016 • What is approved? • The plan of the knowledge transfer

  37. RISE-2016 • What is approved? • The list of deliverables Table B3a. Deliverables List

  38. RISE-2016 • What is approved? • The list of milestones Table B3.b: Milestones List

  39. RISE-2016 • What is approved? • The organization chart

  40. RISE-2016 • What is approved? • Project risks Table B.4 Project risks

  41. The privilege of being old advices

  42. Advices • Attend trainings and info-days • ...always! • Quotes: • „If you cannot explain why your research is important to EU, then you are not for this job“ • „I don’t like to read proposals written in Times New Roman“ • „Nothing is obvious“ • „Find the way to lobby in Brusseles“ • „Bad news come in August, good news come in September“

  43. Advices • Improve your complimentary skills • English writing • Project management • Project management software • Intellectual property management • Human resource management

  44. Advices • You are not alone • Ministry for Education, Science and Technology • Sector for international cooperation • Questions • What is the expected budget? • What are priorities? • Statistics of calls • Project teams of approved proposals

  45. Advices • Dare • „To wait until it’s ready means to wait until it’s too late“

  46. Advices • „Next man up“

  47. Advices • Respond to requests • Write what is requested • Use „unquoted quotations“ – EU terminology • Be ready to sacrifice sometimes • For your team • For your project • For greater good

  48. Advices • Never... • ...ever... • give up

  49. To Ministry • Support your International Relations Office • NCPs need to go to Brussels • Provide complimentary skillstrainings • Stimulate H2020 coordinators • as they do with succesful sportists • or any other way you may haveat disposal

More Related