1 / 20

Encryption infrastructure on-key

Final Presentation. Encryption infrastructure on-key. Written by: Elkin Aleksey Savi Esacov Advisor: Idan Shmuel Winter 2013/14. Background. Now there are a lot of data encryption systems based on hardware

ruby-phelps
Télécharger la présentation

Encryption infrastructure on-key

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Final Presentation Encryption infrastructure on-key Written by: Elkin Aleksey Savi Esacov Advisor: Idan Shmuel Winter 2013/14

  2. Background • Now there are a lot of data encryption systems based on hardware • These systems encryption mechanism and control system loose, so there is a dependence and lack of flexibility in the system • Separation of encryption mechanism and the control system will increase the system flexibility • Allow to change the encryption mechanism according to the needs • Allow to make verification separate for each component • Allow to work on control system and encryption mechanism in same time • Now the lab are realizing the encryption and decryption mechanism, which is implanted into the shell we must build

  3. Project purposes • Design universal infrastructure for encryption/decryption system using FPGA • Creation GUI • Design control system for tracking data from PC to a SD card and back through encrypts / decrypts • Learning and experience in a variety of areas : • RealTime controlling system • FPGA • Programming

  4. Milestone goals • Planning and creating an interface between the DE2 Board and SD card • Planning and creating an interface between the DE2 Board and PC • Planning and creating GUI • Integration between parts of the system

  5. Instruments • Hardware • DE2 Board • NIOS II core • DLP • SD card • Software • Quartus II 13.0 • Qsys • Eclipse – Software control system • Active-HDL – Hardware simulation • Matlab - GUI Hardware synthesis

  6. Architecture – High Level NIOS II software controller Controller hardware AVALON BUS SD card DLP Encryption Decryption (optional) GUI Sending data to encrypt Or decryption request PC

  7. GUI for converting files • Converting text file from regular form in .dat file and back

  8. GUI for sending/receiving data

  9. DLP-USB245M

  10. Block diagram STOP and WAIT protocol(40 kB/s) DLP Nios II/e CTRL FIFO-NIOS HARDWARE FIFO IN 8 bits (char)× 8192 SD Card CTRL NIOS-SD CARD SOFTWARE USB protocol(1 MB/s) STOP and WAIT protocol(40 kB/s) CTRL PC(DLB)-FIFO HARDWARE DE BOARD CTRL FIFO-NIOS HARDWARE FIFO OUT 8 bits (char)× 8192 PC

  11. NIOS II Core • Using Level 1 debugger is essential for Eclipse • Nios II/e Core – enough for our needs

  12. Top Level FIFO OUT NIOS-SD CARD FIFO IN DLP-FIFO controller FIFO-NIOS controller

  13. Top Level Compilation result • When Total memory bits exceed 85% Quartusunable to do Place & Route procedure

  14. Results • Maximum possible data file size : 8kb(dictated by the FIFO size) • System speed: 40 kb/s (dictated by the NIOS-SD card interface)

  15. Software verification • Software controller (NIOS-SD card) verification done by using Eclipse console and inspection

  16. Hardware verification • Hardware controller (DLP-FIFO and FIFO-NIOS) verification by simulation using Active-HDL 9.1

  17. Bugs and Notes • NIOS II software tools – Eclipse require simple example to begin to wok • Require Altera package for NIOS-SD card interface • Using custom data transmitter from FPGA to NIOS-SD card for calculation maximum system speed

  18. Summary and Conclusions • The most of the goals were achieved project • Using software make system work slowly • NIOS-SD card interface via software decrease system speed • Our project allow to compare hardware and software development and implementation • Hardware harder to develop but it faster and easier for debugging

  19. Future development recommendation • Advancing GUI • Better interface for the novice user • Real Time file system • Using RS422 instead DLP • Speed improvement • Exchange software controller to hardware controller

  20. Thank you for listening

More Related