SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Extratropical Response to Madden-Julian Oscillation Simulation - Lin et al. (2010) Study

ruby-yang avatar
19 diapositives · 319 Views · Nov 20, 2014

Explore the impact of Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) on extratropical regions using numerical experiments, focusing on heating location, nonlinearity, and initial conditions. Results show sensitivity of responses, predictability, and implications for subseasonal forecasting.

Extratropical Response to Madden-Julian Oscillation Simulation - Lin et al. (2010) Study - slide 1
01 / 19Extratropical Response to Madden-Julian Oscillation Simulation - Lin et al. (2010) Study
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Extratropical Response to Madden-Julian Oscillation Simulation - Lin et al. (2010) Study
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Simulating the extratropical response to the Madden-Julian Oscillation Hai Lin RPN-A, Environment Canada 46th Congress of CMOS, Montreal May 29, 2012

  2. Outlines • Introduction • Numerical experiments: Dependence on heating location (Lin et al. 2010) Nonlinearity Dependence on initial condition • Summary

  3. Introduction • MJO • Global impact (boreal winter): NAO Canadian temperature Canadian precipitation

  4. Correlation when PC2 leads PC1 by 2 pentads: 0.66 Lin et al. (2010)

  5. Normalized Z500 regression to PC2 Lin et al. (2010)

  6. Model and experiment • Primitive equation AGCM (Hall 2000) – similar configuration of model forcing as the Marshall-Molteni model, but not Q-G. • T31, 10 levels • Time-independent forcing to maintain the winter climate • No moisture equation, no interactive convection

  7. Thermal forcing Exp1 forcing Exp2 forcing Lin et al. (2010)

  8. Z500 response Exp1 Exp2 Lin et al. (2010)

  9. Questions: • Are the responses to opposite signs of MJO forcing mirror images? (nonlinearity) • Which response is more predictable? less spread, less sensitive to initial condition and background flow? • How different are those responses to the same MJO forcing? • How does the response depend on extratropical jet initial condition?

  10. Nonlinearity • 3 sets of experiments: 1) Control 2) +MJO forcing 3) –MJO forcing • From 360 different observed initial conditions • 30-day nonlinear integrations

  11. Thermal forcing +MJO thermal forcing Exp1 forcing Exp2 forcing Lin et al. (2010)

  12. Nonlinearity Z500 response

  13. spread +MJO response has less spread, less sensitive to initial condition, thus more predictable

  14. EOF of 360 Z500 day 6-10responses to the same +MJO Downstream shift Intensify

  15. Dependence on initial condition U200 Jet intensifies Jet moves southward

  16. Summary • There is significant nonlinearity in response in mean response and spread • Response to –MJO is more sensitive to initial condition (when the heating is over central Pacific), and less predictable • Response sensitive to the strength and position of East Asian jet • Implication to subseasonal forecasting: MJO phase and jet initial condition

  17. Why the response to a dipole heating is the strongest ? • Linear integration, winter basic state • with a single center heating source • Heating at different longitudes along the equator from 60E to 150W at a 10 degree interval, 16 experiments • Z500 response at day 10

  18. 80E Day 10 Z500 linear response Similar pattern for heating 60-100E 110E 150E Similar pattern for heating 120-150W