1 / 12

Current Affairs Debate Exhibition Workshop

This structured debate examines the motion "This house believes that it should be a criminal offence for individuals who work in public services to go on strike." A 3 vs. 3 format allows three speakers from the proposition and opposition to present definitions, case stances, and policy arguments. Each side engages in substantive arguments, rebuttals, and the defense of their case. The debate culminates in a summary from each team, highlighting key issues and the strengths of their arguments while addressing the shortcomings of the opposition. This discourse is vital for understanding the implications of public service strikes on society.

rue
Télécharger la présentation

Current Affairs Debate Exhibition Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Current Affairs Debate Exhibition Workshop

  2. Motion This house believes that it should be a criminal offence for individuals who work in public services to go on strike.

  3. 3 v 3, 5 minutes First Proposition First Opposition Second Proposition Second Opposition Third Proposition Third Opposition Fourth Opposition Fourth Proposition

  4. First proposition speaker • Definitions • Case stance • Policy • Case division • Argument 1 (PEEL Structure) • Argument 2 (PEEL Structure)

  5. First opposition speaker • Definitions • Case stance • Policy • Case division • Argument 1 (PEEL Structure) • Argument 2(PEEL Structure)

  6. Second proposition speaker • Rebuttals • Definitions • Substantive Arguments • Defend first speaker’s argument, while taking down opponent’s arguments • Argument

  7. Second opposition speaker • Rebuttals • Definitions • Substantive Arguments • Defend first speaker’s argument, while taking down opponent’s arguments • Argument

  8. Third proposition speaker • Summarize debate into 1-3 key issues • Develop team’s arguments to greatest degree of clarity • Conclusively refute opponent’s case

  9. Third opposition speaker • Summarize debate into 1-3 key issues • Develop team’s arguments to greatest degree of clarity • Conclusively refute opponent’s case

  10. Fourth opposition speaker • May add a final point for the team’s case • Attempts to rebut the proposition’s case • Refutes assertions and examples • Backs up the opposition’s main hits on the proposition • Aims to highlight the ineffectiveness of the proposition to deal with the opposition’s arguments • Summarise the merits of the team’s case and the shortcomings of the proposition.

  11. Fourth proposition speaker • May add one final point for the team’s case • Attempts to rebut the opposition’s case • Refutes assertions and examples • Backs up the proposition’s main hits on the opposition • Aims to highlight the ineffectiveness of the opposition • Summarises the merits of the team’s case and the shortcomings of the opposition.

More Related