1 / 25

Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences

Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences. CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING CDIO IN ALL ENGINEERING EDUCATION PROGRAMMES. Markku Karhu Director, Degree Programmes in Information Technology http://www.metropolia.fi. Content. Overview of Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences

rufin
Télécharger la présentation

Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING CDIO IN ALL ENGINEERING EDUCATION PROGRAMMES Markku Karhu Director, Degree Programmes in Information Technology http://www.metropolia.fi

  2. Content • Overview of Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences • Challenges in Engineering Education • CDIO Roadmap • Structure of curriculum based on CDIO requirement • Self-evaluation of the CDIO implementation at Metropolia • Conclusion

  3. “The country of thousands of lakes”

  4. Some facts of Finland • Population 5,3 million • Capital city is Helsinki • Good social security and health care • Excellent education system • One of the safest country in the world

  5. Sightseeing to Metropolia UAS Headquarter My campus

  6. Metropolia - The largest University of Applied Sciences in Finland • 14 000 students • 61 bachelor and master level degree programmes • 4 fields of study: • Culture • Business and Administration • Health Care and Social Services • Engineering Education (7000 students) • Helsinki, Espoo and Vantaa (Helsinki Metropolitan arkea)

  7. Vision for 2012 In terms of assessed quality, Metropolia will be Finland’s top university of applied sciences in terms of results and competitiveness.As a learning environment that combines labour market skills and higher education, Metropolia will train highly valued experts and meet the capital region’s challenges with an analytical and active approach – boldly and reliably.

  8. Strategic objectives 1. The training and research and development will be of high international standard and carried out in cooperation with the labour market. 2. The learning and research and development will combine to create innovation, know-how and functional solutions that serve the metropolitan region, labour market and higher education. 3. Metropolia will provide major contributions to social, economic and cultural issues. 4. Metropolia will be an ever-developing place of study, a sought-after partner and reliable employer. 5. Metropolia will always put the customer first and operate with financial and functional efficiency.

  9. Degree Programmes in Engineering(Tuition in Finnish) Master’s degrees are available in: • Automation Technology • Building Services Engineering • Industrial Management (in English) • Information Technology (in English) • International Master´s programme ConRem (jointly run with FHTW Berlin): Construction and Real Estate Management Bachelor’s degrees are available in • Automotive and Transport Engineering • Automation Technology • Bio and Food Technology • Chemical Engineering • Civil Engineering • Construction Management • Electrical Engineering • Environmental Engineering (Tuition in English) • Information Technology (Tuition in English) • Laboratory Sciences • Land Surveying Technology • Materials Technology and Surface Engineering Media Technology • Media Engineering (Tuition in English) • Medical Engineering • Mechanical Engineering • Supply Chain Management

  10. Challenges in Engineering Education • Low attractiveness: less than 2 applicants for each study place • Drop-out rate > 50% • Late graduation <- most students work simultaneously • Demand of industry varies a lot; education is a long process • “Global” welfare depends on engineering artefacts • Global economy -> all companies operate worldwide • International education markets

  11. Source: Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators

  12. Changes of Targets of Industry*)-> Have an effect on the education *) in Finland 1993 - 2003

  13. Changes of Challenges of Industry*)-> Have an effect on the education *) in Finland 1993 - 2003

  14. Changes of Supply Chains*)-> Have an effect on the education *) in Finland 1993 - 2003

  15. CDIO Roadmap (1/2) • Started from the SEFI conference in Ankara 2005 • Exploring and studying CDIO pedagogy • CDIO book “Rethinking Engineering Education” distributed widely and read carefully • World conferences in Montreal, Massachusetts, Ghent, Copenhagen, Singapore… • Faculty is interested and waiting with enthusiasm • Curricula planning in 2008 included CDIO principles (introductory project and joint engineering project, integration of courses including soft skills)

  16. CDIO Roadmap (2/2) • Metropolia UAS became a collaborating school, Autumn 2008 • A booklet written on “Introduction to Project-based learning and CDIO thinking” (in Finnish) • Development project supported by VP’s of the three engineering schools

  17. Structure of Curriculum (1) • Bachelor of Engineering degree: 240 ECTS • 11 modules gives 165 ECTS: basic studies 75 ECTS incl. introductory project 6 ECTS • Work placement 30 ECTS, summer time or two periods off • Capstone project (15 ECTS): A project work of 6 - 10 ECTS, integrated professional studies, project management and communication in Finnish or in English • Final Year Project (Bachelor Thesis) 15 ECTS • Freely elective studies 15 ECTS

  18. Structure of Curriculum (2)Example 1st Period 2nd Period 3rd Period 4th Period Module #1(c) Module #2 (c) Module #3 (c) Module #4 (c) 1styear Intr.project Intr.project Module #5(c) Module #6(c) Module #7(o) Module #8(o) 2nd year Orient.project Work Placement Module #9(o) Module #10(o) Project module 3rd year Final Year Project Thesis Work Placement Module #11(o) 4th year Elective Studies

  19. The main objectives of CDIO development • Start the process with a self-evaluation of all engineering programmes to identify from the present situation • the greatest success factors that already exist and might be used in the future • the largest development needs in comparison with the CDIO criteria • Establish and develop a “change agent” network inside the UAS to support the necessary changes • Begin to collect information systemically and analyze the outcomes of the process as it progresses • Plan how to continue with these important and necessary changes

  20. Self-evaluation of the CDIO implementation at Metropolia

  21. Rating Scale Used in the Self-evaluation • 0. No initial program-level plan or pilot implementation • 1. Initial program-level plan and pilot implementation at the course or program level • 2. Well-developed program-level plan and prototype implementation at course and program levels • 3. Complete and adopted program-level plan and implementation of the plan at course and program levels underway • 4. Complete and adopted program-level plan and comprehensive implementation at course and program levels, with continuous improvement processes in place

  22. Self-evaluation by 10 Degree Programmes (scale: 0 - 4)

  23. Adaptation of the CDIO Standards

  24. Conclusion • A start-up was launched • First introductory projects were carried out • Need to be improved and profiled • Capstone projects • On commission, relationship to industrial traineeship and to final year project (?) • Financing (?) • Preference to project or learning achievements (?) • Integration of courses (?), teacher teams (?)

More Related