1 / 26

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Baltimore, MD 2008

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Baltimore, MD 2008. Child Outcomes Measurement: Practices at the Local Level Amanda Faulkner, Frontier Community Services Linda Borghols, AK Part C Keri Bowers, Charleston County School District Norma Donaldson-Jenkins, SC 619. State Profile: AK.

rufina
Télécharger la présentation

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Baltimore, MD 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Baltimore, MD 2008 Child Outcomes Measurement: Practices at the Local Level Amanda Faulkner, Frontier Community Services Linda Borghols, AK Part C Keri Bowers, Charleston County School District Norma Donaldson-Jenkins, SC 619

  2. State Profile: AK • DHSS/Office of Children’s Services • Part C (birth to 3) • Using Child Outcomes Summary Form • Decided by stakeholder process • Collecting data statewide since March 2007

  3. State Profile: AK • Anchor tools • AEPS • Bayley–III • Carolina Curriculum • Brigance • ELAP • HELP • Michigan • SEED

  4. State Profile: SC • State Department of Education • 619 (3 through 5) • Using Child Outcomes Summary Form • Decided by stakeholder process • Collecting data for more than a year • Using several assessment tools including AEPS

  5. Local Challenge STAFF DEVELOPMENT!!

  6. South Carolina!!

  7. Local Strategies--SC • Collaboration • Focus groups • Materials development

  8. Alaska!!

  9. Local Strategies--AK • Collaboration • Training materials on line • Training integral to staff development • Feedback informing training

  10. Local Challenge AGE EXPECTED CHILD DEVELOPMENT

  11. South Carolina!!

  12. Local Strategies--SC • Early learning standards • Web resources • Team communication • Input from general educators

  13. Alaska!!

  14. Local Strategies--AK • Parents as active team members • Decision tree • Gathering sufficient information about the child

  15. Local Challenge MEETING AS A TEAM

  16. South Carolina!!

  17. Local Strategies--SC • Phone conferences • Scheduling meetings to coincide with IEP team meetings • Shared folder on district site that is password protected

  18. Alaska!!

  19. Local Strategies--AK • Teleconferences, especially with rural communities • Strategic meeting scheduling

  20. Local Challenge SHIFT TOWARD THINKING FUNCTIONALLY

  21. South Carolina!!

  22. Local Strategies--SC • Picture children in different settings • Collect information from the family about how the child functions in daily life

  23. Alaska!!

  24. Local Strategies--AK • Core competencies • Functional assessment and IFSP goals • Face-to-face training • Monthly teleconferences • Crosswalks • PRACTICE!!!

  25. Local BENEFITS--SC • Opportunities to collaborate with other staff, other programs • Improved IEP goals • Improved communication with families about child’s functioning

  26. Local BENEFITS--AK • Stronger collaboration between ILP and school district • ILP and school district using same form!! • More functional IFSP goals

More Related