1 / 26

An adaptive hierarchical questionnaire based on the Index of Learning Styles

An adaptive hierarchical questionnaire based on the Index of Learning Styles. OPAH. Alvaro Ortigosa , Pedro Paredes, Pilar Rodriguez Universidad Autónoma de Madrid alvaro.ortigosa@uam.es. OPAH Research group http://tangow.ii.uam.es/opah. The Context. AEHS traditional model. Student.

rusty
Télécharger la présentation

An adaptive hierarchical questionnaire based on the Index of Learning Styles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An adaptive hierarchical questionnaire based on the Index of Learning Styles OPAH Alvaro Ortigosa, Pedro Paredes, Pilar Rodriguez Universidad Autónoma de Madrid alvaro.ortigosa@uam.es OPAH Research grouphttp://tangow.ii.uam.es/opah

  2. The Context • AEHS traditional model Student A(E)HS Course definition Adapted Course

  3. The Context • AEHS traditional model Student User Model A(E)HS Course definition Adapted Course

  4. The Context • AEHS traditional model User Model Student Asking the user (or teacher or…) Deducing / inducing from user behavior

  5. Adapting to LS: an example ILS VALUE ON SEQUENTIAL/GLOBAL: Extreme and mild Sequential Extreme and moderate Global Well balanced

  6. Adapting to LS: an example ILS VALUE ON SEQUENTIAL/GLOBAL: Extreme and mild Sequential Extreme and moderate Global Well balanced

  7. Context: ILS questionnaire • For each of the four dimensions • 11 questions, 2 possible answers • 12 different possible values • It provides a lot of opportunities for adaptation

  8. But… • (At least in Engineering fields) Students are not motivated to fulfill questionnaires • 44Q x LS + 60Q x Personality + 15’ test x IQ • Surveys about teacher performance, workload, “Bologna system”, etc. etc. • “Is it part of the evaluation?” • Students tend to answer more careless as they go through the questions  As the number of questions grows, answers become less reliable

  9. However… • In our experience with teachers, most of the times they just require categorization -11 -9 -7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11 Sequential Neutral Global -11 -9 -7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11

  10. Aha! No, I don’t mean the AH system ;) • If only three categories are needed, would it be possible to ask fewer questions? • If possible, which questions (among the 11 for a given dimension) would provide more (enough) information about the student learning style? 1) I understand something better after I a) try it out b) think it through 2) I would rather be considered a) realistic b) innovative

  11. The goal • To ask each student as few questions as possible • We don’t even need to ask the same questions!

  12. The goal (II) • Not a new questionnaire, but an adaptive version of the ILS Something I have done In groups Something I have thought a lot about … Alone

  13. The idea • Using a database of actual answers from real students • To use machine learning techniques in order • To find most relevant questions for each dimension • Depending on previous answers

  14. Using classification techniques New instances Model Training examples (instances) Learning algorithm Classified Instances

  15. How does a classifier work? • Each instance is represented by a set of attribute values. • Training examples are (usually) already classified. • Classifier model (usually) uses a subset of attributes (conditions, linear combinations, etc.) • Each student represented by her answers to the 11 questions • The class is the category she belongs • Which attributes (questions) does the learnt model use? Sequential Neutral Global -11 -9 -7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11

  16. Classification trees • In classification trees, each node tests a single attribute (question). • Classification trees explicitly shows the learnt model. • It points to the relevant questions. • Different branches on a classification tree can test different attributes. • Tree construction aimed to get shorter paths • C4.5 algorithm chooses next attribute (question) based on the information gain.

  17. Data collection • Three different samples: • 42 secondary school level students. • 88 post-secondary level students. • 200 university level students • Between 15 and 30 years old • 101 women and 229 men

  18. Data collection (II) Active/reflective Sensing/intuitive Visual/verbal Sequential/global

  19. Results I: Active/Reflective dim

  20. Results II: Sensing/Intuitive dim

  21. Results III: Visual/Verbal dim

  22. Results IV: Sequential/Global dim

  23. Results V: the four dimensions • Other results seem to indicate: • a) The relevance of a question does not vary significantly with the age of the student. • b) The trees seem to converge to a common tree, independently from the origin of the sample, or at least to a common subset of questions.

  24. Conclusions • Some questions of the ILS provide more information than others. • We were able to build dynamic (shorter) questionnaires with high precision. • On the average, 4-5 questions needed for each dimension. • The size of the sample (>300) enough for providing good information about 11 questions. • Ad-hoc trees would be better only if the sample is large enough. • Gender does not seem to affect the outcome

  25. Some limitations • More categories will require more questions and larger training sets • The approach is not useful when the exact value for each dimension is needed • For example, automatic grouping

  26. Thank you! Questions?

More Related